similar to: Several problems on Solaris10

Answer inline. On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:59 PM James <list at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > On 29/12/2018 13:49, Pierluigi Frullani wrote: > > > My version is 2.2.13 ( it was the last one, at the time of the first > > server setup ). > > 2.2.13 is from around May 2014. It worked but I can't see why you > wouldn't switch to the latest 2.3.4. (You might be seeing

On 29/12/2018 13:49, Pierluigi Frullani wrote: > I've just upgraded my old Solaris 10 update 8 to Solaris 10 update 11 > with the latest patches, but after the reboot with the new update I'm > having a lot of problems with dovecot. > > My version is 2.2.13 ( it was the last one, at the time of the first > server setup ). 2.2.13 is from around May 2014. It worked but

Hi all, I'm planning to migrate my courier-imap imap server to dovecot, but I'm experiencing a strange issue with fts-lucene plugin. Basically, every time I start a search, the log starts to write: Apr 05 19:30:53 indexer: Error: Indexer worker disconnected, discarding 1 requests for XXXXXX Apr 05 19:30:53 indexer-worker(XXXXX): Fatal: master: service(indexer-worker): child 809 killed

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 7:26 PM Sami Ketola <Sami.Ketola at open-xchange.com> wrote: > Believe me it does. I used to work for Sun Microsystems for 14 years in > Solaris support and sustaining and I can guarantee you that it does. > > You problem is that Solaris has concept of Secure Runtime Linker, and for > trusted applications most of LD_CONFIG and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is ignored

Hi, I'm testing out 2.1.rc1, building against clucene 2.3.3.4. Without libstemmber, the build fails because it attempts to include SnowballAnalyzer.h which is not part of "core" clucene. Simple patch below to make dovecot 2.1.rc1 build with clucene but without libstemmer (or textcat). Looking at libstemmer itself, there are multiple versions. The version in clucene is put into

On 07/30/2014 10:06 AM, Larry Evans wrote: > On 07/30/2014 12:35 AM, Ben Pope wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 01:31 PM, Ben Pope wrote: >> >>> ldd your_built_clang | grep libstdc++ >>> chrpath -l your_built_clang >> >> Hmm, where "your_built_clang" should be the actual failing executable: >>

On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 01:31 PM, Ben Pope wrote: > ldd your_built_clang | grep libstdc++ > chrpath -l your_built_clang Hmm, where "your_built_clang" should be the actual failing executable: /home/evansl/dwnlds/llvm/3.5rc1/build/Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-tblgen Ben

Dear R-help, I am trying to use a package (not from CRAN) which includes two shared library (.so) files. The maintainer suggests inserting two lines in /usr/bin/R, LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:path-to-package/lib export LD_LIBRARY_PATH This works, but I felt more comfortable putting the first line in .Renviron or $R_HOME/etc/Renviron.site. However this doesn't seem to work, and I

I've been trying to upgrade Dovecot-ee package (on EL6/x86_64) from 2.2.15.8-1 to 2.2.16.2-1. It's complaining on these two dependencies: liblz4.so.1 libtextcat.so.0 These would both seem to be related to plugins, and don't seem to be required as package dependencies by the RPM from what I can see from the SRPM. Anyone know what packages I need to satisfy these dependencies?

It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't uniform among the libraries produced by the release. Some use $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none. Is this by design? It seems like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way. If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request. $ for f in

Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so? On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: > From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime > libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they don't > have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what would be > the advantage of having

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries. 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1 clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094 clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-testers

Hi I'm having lots of problems getting Samba to work on Solaris. First I tried the version which comes with Solaris10: 3.0.30. It almost did work, but a user could not _rename_ files. Next try was with 3.4.0. Unfortunately winbindd tried to _modify_ idmap entries in my LDAP server to make them be from the UID range defined in smb.conf. WHY? What's the idea behind it? Winbindd also

From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them? Regards, Jonas Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev: > It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH

libc++.so should be a linker script that automatically pulls in libc++abi (see "Failed to read file header" in your output). And IIRC libc++abi is only one possible implementation that may be used by libc++, but I'm no expert here... Am 2018-03-05 17:33, schrieb Brian Cain: > Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so? > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:53:26PM -0600, Eric Broch wrote: > On 4/2/2015 1:22 PM, Will Yardley wrote: > > I've been trying to upgrade Dovecot-ee package (on EL6/x86_64) from > > 2.2.15.8-1 to 2.2.16.2-1. It's complaining on these two dependencies: > > > > liblz4.so.1 > > libtextcat.so.0 > > > > These would both seem to be related to plugins,

Dear Sirs, I'm looking for the DLL version of Speex, to study very quickly the possible integration of this interesting voice oriented CODEC into our application. We develop, mainly, in Delphi. We use C++ only to develop firmware for our RF transcievers. I saw on the Speex.org website that there is a Delphi program\porting, but this dll is missing there. Can you help me about this? It will

Dear testers, The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one small x86 fix (r326393). Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on the web page. I will

I''m having an issue with Puma, it fails when it tries to restart itself. When this happens it kills all the Puma processes, resulting in nginx delivering a 502 Bad Gateway to our users. I''m able to start, stop & restart it with my /etc/init.d/puma script (it runs /usr/local/bin/run-puma), it just has issues when it restarts itself. The puma.log file doesn''t

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:51:28PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 13:39, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:19:36PM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:00, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:58:38AM +1100, Darren