similar to: BUG mailboxaliases, does not take into account namespaces

On 23 Sep 2020, at 14:07, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > It is just a sieve rule. > > 1. > On disk default file .dovecot.sieve > > 2. I am using roundcube webmail for that. > > 3. with if false # true > # rule:[Out of Office] > if true > { > vacation :days 1 :subject "Test" "test test"; > } Is there a way

The mailboxalias plugin is not working when subfolders are created, rendering its use quite useless. It should work of course something like this. (then I would be able eg. to put my archive mailboxes on different storage, by just creating one symlink on archive (get it??;)) If there is a new mailbox created And in its path there is a folder/path configured in aliases plugin Get the original

All your approaches are not well thought out. The best solutions are always the simplest ones. KISS principle dictates so. On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 15:01, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > How long have we been using the current strategy? Do we have less or > more abuse clouds operating? > > "Let the others bother with their own problems." is a bit

My query? Is dovecot not getting this field automatically? -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Dovecot proxy with ldap, complains about 'host not given' On 23 Nov 2019, at 16:11, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > It looks like the dovecot proxy can authenticate correctly but fails > then on with this message > > Nov 23 23:33:33 test2 dovecot:

I added this: passdb { driver = passwd skip = authenticated } Which enables indeed local delivery, I also noticed this. Maybe the password field check shoud not be done, when you enable skip authentication? Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): Debug: passwd(test): lookup Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): passwd(test): invalid password field '*'

> On 17 Jan 2019, at 14.19, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > > Same ip, connection, session happens after a few seconds, all on local > test network. Sorry I mistakenly overlooked at the ip:s. But anyway that is multiple connections and seems that PAM has some concurrency limit and refuses the third connection Thunderbird opens. so you probably have

Marc, There is a strategy loosely referred to as "choose your battles well" :-) Let the others bother with their own problems. If you can, hack the server and dump the 500GB - you'll be using resources transferring the 500GB as the other server receives it. Two servers wasting resources because you think you are punishing an offender! On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:43, Marc Roos

I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu) Date:

On 23 Sep 2020, at 14:29, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > You can do whatever you like, as long as the result is this 'text' file. > I have also bash file that modifies this file for users. You can make a > 5 min cron job that detects changes in ldap and then creates the sieve > rule. I've tried the cronjob approach before, and people didn?t like

> On 30 December 2018 at 17:09 Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > > > I can only move messages to a root namespace folder when specifying > inbox=yes. That is strange because it is not even the inbox. I don't > even get why it is not by default possible, maybe bug there? > This makes no sense. inbox=yes namespace means the namespace which

> On 31 December 2018 at 15:47 Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> I can only move messages to a root namespace folder when specifying > >> inbox=yes. That is strange because it is not even the inbox. I don't > > >> even get why it is not by default possible, maybe bug there? > >>

Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of daemon that listens for SMTP and then offers incoming email to Dovecot's LMTP socket. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at

I receive a local mail when I do a 'mail test' on a backend svr1 with this[0] configuration. However when I just add only one configuration change 'lmtp_proxy = yes' I am getting these errors[1]. I would expect this email to still be delivered locally, should this be working or do I misunderstand the lmtp proxy functionality? [0] passdb { args = auth_verbose = default

I think sdbox or mdbox format is what you are looking for > On 2 Dec 2018, at 09:47, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > > No one an idea? I like to put some "archive" folders on a less iops > storage. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Roos > Sent: donderdag 29 november 2018 18:09 > To: dovecot > Subject:

If I do the same test[1] with mbox I can store around 31k messages and mdbox 16k messages. I noticed also that cpu and disk utilization with mdbox was not very high, while disk utilization on mbox was much higher. That makes me wonder if I can tune mdbox to have better performance? [1] imaptest - append=100,0 logout=0 host=svr port=143 user=test pass=xxx seed=100 secs=240 clients=1

Maybe nice to share some details? -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[4]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten,

It looks like the dovecot proxy can authenticate correctly but fails then on with this message Nov 23 23:33:33 test2 dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: host not given: user=<test>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured, session=<LDTlHguYJth/AAAB> I have configured a host= in ldap for this user

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> You need to specify fields you want. Fields are not imported automatically. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> See <a

This is not working because the numbering is not successive. This whole configuration implementation is of course nothing to be proud of. plugin { #setting_name = value # archive folder mailbox_alias_old = Archive mailbox_alias_new = Archief mailbox_alias_old2 = Archive mailbox_alias_new2 = Archief mappen mailbox_alias_old3 = Archive mailbox_alias_new3 = Archived messages

> and forward- and reverse DNS records for your mailserver match. do even googles ips confirm to this standard?