similar to: Downloading e-mail from a master mail server

In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one related to the other: 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a bit. At this point, we've got servers operating as MTAs, servers doing IMAP/POP

Hi Everyone, This is going to sound silly but... I''m just off the phone with a Microsoft SPLA reseller. They sell licenses to run Microsoft software in a hosted environment. I was asking about obtaining Windows licenses to run on my Xen VPS hosting solution. Maybe there is a big misunderstanding, but I''m faily sure she said that it was illegial for me to rent out Xen

Hi, I will probably have to design an e-mail (and other components) infrastructure for a small ISP soon (WISP). I'm doing some research to determine which components would be best to offer e-mail services to their client and allow the staff to manage accounts easily. I usually use virtual machines a lot for isolation and easy backups and migration (when a hardware node is

Hello all, OK, I would really appreciate your help on this. I managed to do a pretty straight-forward and flawless migration on dovecot from one domain to another. However, I have this nagging problem with most of the thunderbird MTAs. When I try to delete some "test" messages I sent to make sure that everything works, it comes back with the following message on the bottom of the

Hi All, What are my e-mail serving options? I need to host POP, IMAP and SMTP. I must admit that non-windows e-mail hosting has always been a chore for me. I remember QMail and QPopper IIRC. -Jason

Am 12.06.2020 um 02:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > * Andreas Born: > >> There exists one problem: at this stage of mail reception you have no >> body content nor header information on which a milter may perform >> deeper analysis, only envelope data. > > I am not sure what you mean by "this stage of mail reception", or what I meant the different stages when

There are times when I need to call a client from my cell and I want a recording of the call. I was trying to put into an * a way of doing that. Below is what I'm using in my extensions.conf exten=> X,1,Read(num,"/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/mtas/10digit",10,,,5) exten=> X,2,SayDigits(${num}) exten=> X,3,Background(/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/mtas/verify) exten=>

On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote: > On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered): >> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running >>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud > > I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when > there is an issue in the MTA, our

Gerald Galster wrote on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:49:17 +0200: > Is this a dovecot problem on your side? dovecot usually accepts mail > from MTA like postfix, so it would be better to remove example1.com from > postfix relaydomains (mailbox domains, alias domains, ...). Then there > is no delivery to dovecot. Most MTAs ignore MX records - if a domain is > configured locally, it gets

On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> >> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >> >> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why >> blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards >> problem. > >

Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires statement with a logic? Like: Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide such facility. I do not see such possibility for DB packages ... Thanks -- LF

I am sharing out ZFS ISCSI luns to my Mac. When copying large files, the network will hang in the middle of the transfer and the LUN will become unavailable until I plumb the NIC. This issue appears to only occur only when I am reading files (ie..syncing an ipod) and not writing (I''m not 100% sure though). When I snoop the interface I notice a bunch of ARP lookups. Any ideas? Thanks in

Hi, We actually have a mail hosting solutions with aprox. 100 thousand of email account, where about 90% of a customers use POP3 like email configuration. About a few mounths (we perfomed a lot of migration throught mbox email software to Maildir with dovecot) but i can see that the performance is very poor and receive complaint about delays of autentications of accounts. The solution

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:27:58 -0500, you wrote: >No attempt to deliver almost always means either: >- a DNS problem; the sender can't find the destination, or finds the >"wrong" destination. That would be interesting, since I tried both the actual IP address and the DNS name for the test node. Neither message got through. >- a connectivity problem; the sender can't

Hi all: I am learning Dovecot step by step. I have enabled the Submission Server, in the hope that I would not need to learn other MTAs like Postfix. The Submission Server is very comfortable: it picks up the existing Dovecot configuration, so that you do not need to configure any user authentication separately. It is working fine on my test setup. My first thought was that, if the recipient

Am 11.06.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > Generating backscatter is definitely not a good move, and it is even > prone to punish yourself. Better to reject the offending message with > a 5xx status code and some explanatory text or the URL. > > The various tests required to come to a decision about accepting or > rejecting the message can be executed in a milter.

Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com>?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > > mail1/mail2 is for

Given the following: mailboxes: user1 at example1.com user2 at example1.com user3 at example1.com etc. aliases: whatever at example1.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example2.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example3.com -> user1 at example1.com Now the problem: example1.com MX goes elsewhere (doesn't point to this server anymore). Domains example2.com and

This is a little off topic, but I can't seem to hit the right google keywords to get an answer to what should be a simple question. My A@H box sits behind a firewall and needs to use an internal host to relay all email (voicemail notifications). I can't for the life of me find where to make this setting, as I'm used to postfix MTAs. Any help greatly appreciated! Thanks,

Hi Karanbir, everyone I've only just noticed that the sections on Reporting, Multiple MX Considerations and Whitelisting on the Postgrey page are specific to postfix/postgrey. I remember we previously talked about making that page less specific to any particular MTA, and Steve has since kindly contributed a section for sendmail. So I'm wondering how we could best restructure the page