Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag"
2018 Dec 05
4
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
* Jakobus Sch?rz:
> 1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,Sa
>
> Then i move this email to another IMAP-Folder, and then there is the
> filename
>
> 1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,
>
> As expected, the seen-flag disappeared... the same as thunderbird
> shows.
And what about the "dovecot-keywords" files in both folders? Do they
match?
2018 Dec 05
3
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
What really strange is:
There is a seen message
1544001025.M268344P5000.mymail,S=2804,W=2861:2,S
Shown in Thunderbird as seen. Then i move this message to INBOX, and the
logs say:
Dec 05 10:22:23 mymail dovecot[24019]: imap(user.name)<5276><+eYG4kJ85DMuffon>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: Mailbox opened because: UID move
Dec 05 10:22:23 mymail dovecot[24019]:
2018 Dec 05
2
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
We've all shown the way it should work, and what DOES work for us.
There appears to be <something> different about your setup.
I've showed you my spam sieve filter that does set \Seen.
I deliver my mail via dovecot LMTP to mbox formatted files.
What's different in your setup?
Those \Seen flags are visible in ALL the clients I use (Outlook, Outlook
Android, Gmail Android,
2018 Dec 04
2
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
* Jakobus Sch?rz:
> The \Recent flag ist set and the \Seen-Flag is removed in the new
> folder. So it is not a problem of thunderbird.
Did you mention your data storage format yet? If you use Maildir, Flags
are stored as part of the physical file name. For example, the name
"1539996635.M698476P4944.foo,S=45171,W=45803:2,RS" indicates that the
message was seen ('S') and
2018 Dec 05
0
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Does it matter, if the keyword-files do not match?
In one of the two folders is the content of dovecot-keywords
0 $label3
1 Junk
2 NonJunk
in the other folder:
0 $label3
1 NonJunk
2 Junk
3 redirected
4 $label2
5 $label4
6 Seen
As i said, i use $labes[1-4] from thunderbird.
And i use as MUA Thunderbird, Androids Gmail-App, Horde webmail,
somtimes samsungs mail-app on android, k9mail on android
2018 Dec 05
0
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Hello!
is anybody else here??? Are my informations to much? Am I alone with
this fucking shit? Are my informations to less??? Why do I have the
feeling, nobody else is interesting in this problem?
Jakob
Am 05.12.18 um 11:37 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz:
>
> What really strange is:
>
> There is a seen message
>
> 1544001025.M268344P5000.mymail,S=2804,W=2861:2,S
>
> Shown in
2018 Dec 05
0
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Ok. I told you, that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried
to figure out, whats happening here... And my dovecot is not working as
it is designed...
It's nice to see, that dovecot is working for you... but here it is not
working as it should...
Changing to cyrus? What should i do? Where i can find debug-infos?
Please understand me right... It is nice for you, if dovecot does,
2018 Dec 04
0
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Hi Ralph!
There is an email, which filename is:
1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,Sa
Then i move this email to another IMAP-Folder, and then there is the
filename
1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,
As expected, the seen-flag disappeared... the same as thunderbird shows.
This happens if i move the file with thunderbird with drag&drop and in
horde and in androids
2018 Dec 04
2
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
This is, what the logs say, when i move a message to another folder with
thunderbird drag&drop
Dec 04 17:22:24 mymail dovecot[16982]: imap(user.name)<17010><XtHsqjR8JqbV0J0m>: copy from INBOX/Arbeiten/bla: box=INBOX, uid=849, msgid=<a133b9b2-6913-14e8-f509-b6c81750e076 at bla.com>, from=Full Name <user at bla.com>, subject=TEST005, flags=($label3 NonJunk)
Dec 04
2018 Dec 04
0
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Moving a message from one folder to another with thunderbird, gmail-app
on android and horde webmail has always the same behaviour.
The \Recent flag ist set and the \Seen-Flag is removed in the new
folder. So it is not a problem of thunderbird.
BR Jakob
Am 04.12.18 um 17:31 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz:
> This is, what the logs say, when i move a message to another folder
> with thunderbird
2018 Dec 04
2
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
I have an additional information.
Moving a already seen messsage to another imap-folder (drag&drop in
thunderbird) shows this email in the other folder as unseen and recent.
Is this normal behaviour?
BR Jakob
Am 04.12.18 um 16:36 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz:
> Yes. I did it the same way, Larry described.
>
> And i have in my sieve-script, which i use also for years the other
>
2016 Mar 15
2
Intermittent Win7 trust issues
Hello list!
I'm trying to debug a problem that surfaced after a Samba upgrade from
v3.5.x to v4.1.17.
The problem is that Win7 workstations appear to randomly experience domain
trust issues logging in, although they can log in some times, they are
unsuccessful at other times. I cannot so far predict what would result in or
influence this behaviour. These are workstations on which
2009 Jun 01
1
LM/GLM can't find weights vector from within a function (PR#13735)
Full_Name: Alberto Gaidys
Version: 2.9.0
OS: Mac OS X 10.5.7
Submission from: (NULL) (201.81.185.155)
When calling LM or GLM from within a function, R gives a message error that it
can't find the specified weights object "Erro em eval(expr, envir, enclos) :
objeto 'W' n?o encontrado" (Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'W' not
found).
The call from within
2019 Jun 12
1
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 172, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2007 Nov 09
6
[Bug 1390] New: RekeyLimit max value is too restrictive
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1390
Summary: RekeyLimit max value is too restrictive
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.7p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ssh
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
2010 Sep 27
1
Problem with Samba - Openldap and domain autentication of Windows XP
Hello all,
I have some problems to make work a configuration like Samba and
OpenLDAP as domain controller. My operative system is OpenSuSE 11.3.
Here is my testparm:
[global]
workgroup = MEDIADC
netbios name = MEDIADC
map to guest = Bad User
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://afs-test.mediaservice-test.pri
log level = 2
printcap name = cups
2020 Apr 10
15
[Bug 1422] New: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw table
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422
Bug ID: 1422
Summary: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw
table
Product: iptables
Version: 1.6.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Hi!
I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet.
ERROR(<class
2010 Sep 29
1
Problems Windows 7 64 Bit joining a Samba + Ldap domain
Hello all,
I am doing some tests with Windows 7 and a Samba Domain, but into a
working SAMBA domain, where windows XP joins without problems, when i
try with 7 i recieve an error like "The trust relationship between this
workstation and the primary domain failed.". I use OpenSuSE 11.3 with
samba 3.5.4-5.1.2 and openldap 2.4.21-9.1.
My config of samba:
[global]
workgroup =
2019 Dec 11
4
[Bug 1390] New: iptables -m string not working with --algo bm and OUTPUT chain under 5.3.x
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1390
Bug ID: 1390
Summary: iptables -m string not working with --algo bm and
OUTPUT chain under 5.3.x
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5