similar to: Mail slowed down to a crawl...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Mail slowed down to a crawl..."

2018 Nov 16
1
Mail slowed down to a crawl...
Yes, I thought all of those things too. Spent a good part of yesterday eliminating them as the cause. top and iotop do not show any issues. No spam filtering on this box (it?s a separate server/software). Drive is 1/3 full. No smart errors. The queue problem (and I don?t know why this isn?t handled better) turned out to be a couple of corrupted messages in the queue. Had about 400 messages
2018 Nov 15
0
Mail slowed down to a crawl...
Den 15.11.2018 21:00, skrev StarionTech (IMAP): > Been moving along just fine for a couple years now, then in the last two days, email has slowed to a crawl. > > Retrieving email via IMAP is very slow, progress bar in the mail client shows that it is downloading messages almost constantly, like it never closes the connection, or it?s getting the messages very slowly. The server that
2011 Jan 07
3
When are Logwatch errors really errors
Hi All, I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So I google a lot to read and learn. I have a few things in my Logwatch that I want to make sure I understand 1. smartd **Unmatched Entries** Problem creating device name scan list Device /dev/sda: using '-d sat' for ATA disk behind SAT layer. Device /dev/sdb: using '-d sat' for ATA disk behind SAT layer.
2007 Dec 06
1
smartd.conf get overridden
Yohoo! I have some issues with the smartd in CentOS5/x64 I edited the /etc/smartd.conf for my needs and restarted the smartd with "service smartd restart". But the start script is overriding my file. I checked it and saw the following lines: ---------------/etc/init.d/smartd------------ case "$1" in start | reload | restart) GEN_CONF="*SMARTD*AUTOGENERATED*" [ !
2006 Mar 14
2
SMART for SATA devices ?
I noticed that the changelog for the new kernel 2.6.9-34 on the redhat enterprise watchlist states on of the fixes as; 145061 - SMART support in SATA driver (P1) Does this mean that with that kernel we should be able to interrogate SATA drives now ? Cheers, Bards.
2008 Aug 25
2
smartd
last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G I found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon [root at PowerEdge1 pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Opened configuration file /etc/smartd.conf Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1
2013 Jan 18
2
Smartd Warning in logwatch report
I updated the machine that I use for a web/email server last night to 5.9, and I have this in the logwatch report this morning: QUOTE: --------------------- Smartd Begin ------------------------ Warnings: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], WARNING: There are known problems with these drives, - 1 Time(s) **Unmatched Entries** smartd 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [x86_64-linux-2.6.18-348.el5] (local
2006 Oct 31
4
ZFS Automatic Device Error Notification?
Okay, so now that I''m planning to build my NAS using ZFS, I now need to devise or learn of a preexisting method to receive notification of ZFS handled errors on a remote machine. For example, if a disk fails and I don''t regularly login or SSH into the ZFS server, I''d like an email or some other notification immediately of the ZFS event. Are there already ways to do
2011 Jan 21
2
smartmontools SRPM fails
I want to install smarmontools v 5.40, and so I pulled the SRPM for 5.39 so I could patch and install... $ wget -Nc ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm However, the install of the source fails. $ rpm -ivh smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm warning: smartmontools-5.39.1-2.el6.src.rpm: V3 RSA/MD5 signature: NOKEY, key ID
2020 Sep 29
4
External harddisk
I have an old external harddisk, Toshiba 320 Gb, with a USB connector that I wanted to check for contents. It did not start up when connected and I could not hear the motor spinning. After leaving it in the freezer overnight the motor spins but it is not recognized by my computer. I disassembled it and could see that the head assembly rests outside the disk but when it is powered on, the head
2008 Oct 10
2
smartd and 3ware on centos5
Hi, I've CentOS5 box with 3ware RAID controller in it. I can't get the tw_cli command line tool to work, and smartd also barks on me. The tw_cli simply doesn't see the controller, no errors logged anywhere. When starting smartd, it is much more verbose. I'm getting a bunch of messages like this: Oct 9 22:15:15 toporko kernel: program smartd is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl,
2009 Nov 24
3
hard drive errors
Hello I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable or not, here are the messages This email was generated by the smartd daemon running on: host name: localhost.localdomain DNS domain: localdomain NIS domain: (none)
2008 Oct 27
1
Short SMART check causes disk op timeouts
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk (/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.././03|L/../../7/03) -m root). The problem is that each time the test runs I get messages like the following in /var/log/messages: Oct 26 04:54:15 35 kernel: ad6: TIMEOUT -
2012 Apr 05
4
6.2 - How to check for a failed disk using LVM with a hardware RAID (3ware)
CentOS Community, What commands can I use to check the disk health of the system when LVM2 is being used on top of a RAID 10 using a HARDWARE 3ware raid card. The OS sees a hardware raid usually as one big drive. Is there a way to check the disks individually to see if any are failing, or throwing hard or scsi transport errors?
2011 Nov 03
1
CentOS-5.7 + megaraid + SELinux : update problem
Hello, After updating to CentOS-5.7, I have a (small) problem : The context of /dev/megadev0 is now defined (in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts) as system_u:object_r:removable_device_t:s0. This cause smartmontools to fail : avc: denied { read write } for pid=2847 comm="smartd" name="megadev0" dev=tmpfs ino=8284
2017 Feb 12
4
Replacement for antispam plugin
Den 12. feb. 2017 21:44, skrev ebroch at whitehorsetc.com: > > > Any opinion on dspam's interoperability with this? > > Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam. Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) translated into unix line-endings (\r). like so: ----- learn-spam.sh --------- #!/bin/sh sed -e 's/\r$//' | /usr/bin/dspam
2019 Aug 04
2
browsers slowing Centos 7 installation to a crawl
elinks does not seem to be working for me. I typed in google.com as my first url. There seems to be no way out of google, nor any way further in. No place to type a url. What appears to be the search window is black and does not accept input. Oops. Now I seem to have clicked on google help or something. There seems no way to back up. Ok. Found the left arrow. Still no way to search or to get out
2017 Nov 25
1
Mark message as read when moved to Trash
Den 25. nov. 2017 11:36, skrev Peter Chiochetti: > Am 2017-11-25 um 10:12 schrieb Felix Rubio Dalmau: >> Hi all, >> >> ????When I send a message to trash, without previously reading it >> (just with the subject is enough to say I do not want to read it), it >> remains as "unread". Then, clients (I am using Kmail) report there are >> unread message,
2019 Aug 04
3
browsers slowing Centos 7 installation to a crawl
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Are you sure you don?t have other processes or users running on the system? It only happens when you have a network connection? It might also be swapping heavily, check to see how much RAM you have. Check the output of ?free?. Pretty sure. I rebooted this morning. top - 17:32:20 up 15:47, 6 users, load average: 1.12, 2.55, 1.56 Tasks: 238
2011 Jan 27
3
Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
Hi all, For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and comments welcome. Thanks. -- BW, Sorin ----------------------------------------------------------- # Sorin Srbu [Sysadmin, Systems Engineer] # Dept of Medicinal