similar to: MailLog plugin distinguish between simultaneous logins

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com>: > On 7.11.2018 16.13, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is it, somehow, possible to distinguish between multiple simultaneous >> logins in MailLog plugin? For example, which login deleted which >> message. Is that p[lugin able to log e.g. session ID? >> >> azur >> >> >

On 7.11.2018 16.13, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > Hi, > > is it, somehow, possible to distinguish between multiple simultaneous > logins in MailLog plugin? For example, which login deleted which > message. Is that p[lugin able to log e.g. session ID? > > azur > > mail_log_prefix = "%s(%u)<%{pid}><%{session}>: " Aki

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i'm trying to

> On July 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > >>> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >>> >

Cit?t Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: >> On 12 Jul 2017, at 10.36, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Backends don't have access to user database and i wanted to keep it >> like this :( > > Then probably your only possibility is to update last_login > information with the authentication > policy framework introduced in dovecot 2.2.25: >

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user >> is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. >> I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > On 2017-08-27 12:06, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. >> >> Thx >> >> Harald > > Try http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian.new/ > > Aki Hi, i always wonder why is anyone using this repository? There is a big warning in the wiki that

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on >> proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password >> (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on >>

Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: > Really no more info? You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. Regards, Stephan. > > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be >> anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are

Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are really internal/local, this is decided by sending SMTP everytime something is sent, based on MX records). Problem is that Dovecot/Sieve is using wrong SMTP server (one used for receiving e-mails which should NEVER be used for sending [and

Hi, i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on backends, is telling me that i need to configure at least one auth mechanism: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in configuration file. LOGIN mechanism needs one The master auth

>> On 18 October 2018 at 15:49 azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> is it possible to use 'doveadm expunge' with static user database? Or >> can i, somehow, tell dovecot the directory location where i need to > do >> an expunge? Thank you. >> >> >> azur > >

Hi, i'm trying to resolve few problems with indexing 'From' headers using FTS/Solr. I was tcpdumping the communication between Dovecot and Jetty/Solr and noticed that 'From' headers, which includes also sender's name, are double escaped. This is what was Dovecot sending to Solr: </field><field name="from">Name Surname &amp;lt;test at

Hi, is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user database (so i cannot run it on backends). azur

Hi, does hibernation works well with proxy? Are proxy connections hibernated or not? azur

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 12, 2017 at 10:16 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> is it possible to run a

Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: > On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). >> >> >> >> Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file >> ostream-dot.c: line 208

Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: >> >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >>>> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded).

Hi, sorry for previous message, i accidentaly send it before it was complete. Recently, i was configuring a setup with one proxy, which is doing authentication and multiple backends, which doesn't have access to user database (see https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot at dovecot.org/msg70123.html ). Now i wanted to use FTS (solr) on backends but i'm getting this error everytime

Hi, in our setup, we have two SMTP servers: - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for delivery) - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as outgoing SMTP server) Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - with this setup, we can allow to our users to