similar to: VOLATILEDIR not really used?

On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >>>> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >>>> to this

On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >> to this directory? > > > What dotlocks? I guess mbox and Maildir have some locks that could be > moved there, but a better performance optimization for those > installations

On 5 Oct 2018, at 16.42, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: > > On 2018-10-05 11:50, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk <mailto:mail at tomsommer.dk>> wrote: >>>> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:

On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > Hi > > According to the docs, setting VOLATILEDIR will improve I/O performance when using NFS - but as far as I can see, only vsize lock-files are put here, and little else? Right. I think also autoexpunge locking. > Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. to this directory?

On 2018-10-05 11:50, Tom Sommer wrote: > On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>> >>>>> Is this correct, and if so

On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > > On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > >>> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. to this directory? >> What dotlocks? I guess mbox and Maildir have some locks that could be

On 07 Apr 2016, at 14:49, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2016-04-06 21:09, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>>> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. >>>> I get that

On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my >> current usages are reset. >> >> I get that I can do "doveadm quota recalc -A", but it takes forever >> (and auth processes time out/crash). >>

Hello, it's the first time for me writing to the list, I'm trying to change the location into which the Dovecot's locks are done reserving a special temporary directory on an other partition, then adding to the dovecont.conf the line: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:VOLATILEDIR=/tmp_lock/%2.256Nu/%u so that through the VOLATILEDIR directive the locks should be written in this

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On October 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM Federico Bartolucci <federico at aruba.it> > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > it's the first time for me writing to the list, I'm trying to change the > > location into which the Dovecot's locks are done reserving

I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. I get that I can do "doveadm quota recalc -A", but it takes forever (and auth processes time out/crash). It would make much more sense to recalc the usage on login if the current usage is unset. Is there no way to do a recalc-quota-on-first-login? Thanks. -- Tom Sommer

Timo Sirainen wrote: > There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: > 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks > 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated Thanks for these changes! Big win for my setup. My servers are not overly stressed, but how much performance

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.32.tar.gz.sig Two more fixes since rc2. And repeating: There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.32.rc1.tar.gz.sig There are various changes in this release that can be used to significantly reduce disk IO with: 1) NFS storage especially, but I guess also other remote filesystems and even some with local disks 2) When mail storage and INDEX storage are separated * imapc: Info-level

On 2016-04-05 08:44, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> On April 5, 2016 at 9:27 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2016-04-04 20:22, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> >> > Since the API is still a little beta, it will not return anything in >> > case >> > doveadm does not like the arguments (that is, calls

Mar 19 16:54:37 lmtp(xxxx at xxx.xxx): Panic: file file-lock.c: line 269: unreached Mar 19 16:54:37 lmtp(xxxx at xxx.xxx): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x35f647e07a] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x35f647e0e6] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x35f647d4ac] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x35f6481edf] ->

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:48:17 +0200 Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > On 2018-10-22 12:56, Mar?a Arrea wrote: > > > We use sabredav for caldav+cardav and roundcube+agendav for nice > > web ui :) > > > Is Sabre still maintained? http://sabre.io/ says 2018 is most recent version -- In modern fantasy (literary or governmental), killing people is the

> On May 2, 2016 at 9:56 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > > > On 2016-04-29 16:25, Matteo Gaito Test Account wrote: > > > i've search a lot in order to find a way to delete account by dovecot > > but i > > found only this way > > > > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-November/079273.html > > > > It's