similar to: Fatal: Support not compiled in for passdb driver 'pam'

Hello all, I hope someone can help me, I have been testing out Dovecot to switch from popa3d which I use at the moment. When I get several users connecting and disconnection multiple times, the Dovecot process with command Auth uses 50-90% of the CPU for the period which they are connecting. I am wondering if there is something that I may have misconfigured, or if there is something that I can

Hello! I'm encountering a bug with samba shares, rsync and hard links. I was trying to investigate why on my "linksys" samba share i wouldn't get any hard link transferred and rsyncs to it would take forever. To keep a long story short, here's the output of the command, which should be pretty explanatory :-) mount says that: //192.168.0.105/DISK on /samba/linksys type

Hello, I have the following fatal error when I uncomment #!include auth-sql.conf.ext in .../conf.d/10-auth.conf dovecot: auth: Fatal: Support not compiled in for passdb driver 'sql' I have installed via 'pkg'. Do I have to install the ports tree to get sql support ? Thanks, -Graham-

Yes, the defaults do not include DB support. Larry Rosenman mail/dovecot maintainer -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106 ?On 7/21/18, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Graham S. Jarvis" <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org on behalf of

The problem from the FreeBSD perspective is that both MySQL and PostgreSQL are supported, but they are large. I might see if I can make flavors, but I won?t have time for that for a few weeks. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106 From: "Graham

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 22:15, gsjarvis <gsjarvis at pt.lu> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if there was any progress on this. > > I just upgraded a FreeBSD box and had the same issue again. > > I keep (reasonably) good support notes so I found the one that said I had > to > install from ports - so all is well. I was just wondering if there was any > news.

Ports has the options, I'm just not changing the defaults. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> on behalf of Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 3:47:43 AM To: gsjarvis Cc: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: Freebsd: Fatal error - Support not

I have a package that I'm developing that I need to unload the library. Long story short I figured out that the leaving the compiled code loaded lead to a segmentation fault, but unloading the code will fix it. I've read the documentation and it appears that there are several ways to do this? What is the popper accepted current standard for unloading compiled code? The options as I

OK, will do. Feels like a big hammer for a small nut - has there been any discussion about having loadable modules? Thanks for the quick reply! Larry Rosenman wrote on 21/07/18 18:59: > Yes, the defaults do not include DB support. > > Larry Rosenman > mail/dovecot maintainer > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Since Jakob had expressed some concerns regarding machine-generated files, I asked him by email about his views on this RFC. Here are the emails that we exchanged in attach. Anyone feel free to jump in via the mailing-list. TIA -- Evandro Menezes Austin, TX emenezes at codeaurora.org Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of the Code Aurora Forum -------------- next

Hello, I was wondering if there was any progress on this. I just upgraded a FreeBSD box and had the same issue again. I keep (reasonably) good support notes so I found the one that said I had to install from ports - so all is well. I was just wondering if there was any news. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, -Graham- -- Sent from: http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/

> On Jul 22, 2020, at 18:09, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan_roelofs at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 22, 2020, at 4:31 PM, Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes at sifive.com <mailto:evandro.menezes at sifive.com>> wrote: >>> Sure, let’s talk about what that end goal should be! Can you give some other examples of where these inconsistencies could be

I'm hoping to migrate to dovecot from qpopper, with the eventual goal of enabling IMAP. However, my qpopper installation is fairly specialized, so I thought I'd ask here to see if anyone could get me headed down the best path. Here's the situation. I'm running FreeBSD and have a virtual domains setup with an extremely hacked LDA to do delivery to mailboxes within hashed

Hi, Sam. I think that it's a fair comparison. Keep in mind that the GP is only used to reach global variables of local scope and the GOT, where the address of global variables of global scope reside. This model assumes that the distance between the GP and the global data area, GOT and local scope variables is defined at link time. __ Evandro Menezes ◊ SiFive ◊ Austin, TX > On Mar

Hi, Jonathan. > On Jul 21, 2020, at 17:15, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan_roelofs at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 21, 2020, at 1:46 PM, Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes at sifive.com <mailto:evandro.menezes at sifive.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 21, 2020, at 14:30, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org

Oh, I wasn’t really thinking about devices without an MMU where the addresses are physically separated. Makes sense. This reminds me of rwpi on ARM; it has a sort of similar scheme of referring to data indirectly through a pointer, but it also changes the ABI to keep the pointer in a reserved register. -Eli From: Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes at sifive.com> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020

Hello, I believe MCInstrDesc::getSchedClass() is what you're looking for. -Jim On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote: > I'd appreciate some help in figuring out how to determine which > InstrItinClass an instruction belongs to. > > For example, an InstrItinClass is defined in Schedule.td as: > > def FOO : InstrItinClass; > > Which is then used

On 03/20/2017 03:33 PM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > On 3/20/17 1:47 PM, Evandro Menezes via llvm-dev wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I'm at a loss trying to add Compiler-RT to an LLVM build, even after >> checking out the instructions at http://compiler-rt.llvm.org, so I'd >> appreciate your help. >> >> I've tried adding the CMake options

If I’m following correctly, there are two size-limited areas. One area, limited to 2GB, is the “text” area. This contains all the code. Then there’s a “global” area, limited to 4GB, which is pointed to by the global pointer. This contains the GOT, plus a flexible area that the object file can stick small bits of data into. And then outside of both of those, additional data is unlimited. It

I'd appreciate some help in figuring out how to determine which InstrItinClass an instruction belongs to. For example, an InstrItinClass is defined in Schedule.td as: def FOO : InstrItinClass; Which is then used to build an InstrItinData in ProcessorItineraries and to specify the class of a particular instruction. I'd like to find out from a given instruction which class it belongs