similar to: HTTP DoveAdm API - Possible bug?

Yeah. This is a bug, there is a fix pending. >From bb200128c83610d213b2ff2e59f1e0440ecbd2c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:37:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] doveadm: Fix doveadm user output when called from server Was forgotten in a13b1245bee0b6524b4aeb3c8fd9e34af648b746 --- src/doveadm/doveadm-auth-server.c | 6 +++++- 1 file

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.16.tar.gz.sig + Added quota-status policy service for Postfix + Added "doveadm batch" command to run multiple commands before moving onto the next user (useful only with -A and -u <usermask>) + Added forwards compatibility for v2.2 index files - mdbox: Index rebuilding crashed

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.16.tar.gz.sig + Added quota-status policy service for Postfix + Added "doveadm batch" command to run multiple commands before moving onto the next user (useful only with -A and -u <usermask>) + Added forwards compatibility for v2.2 index files - mdbox: Index rebuilding crashed

Hello, I'm writing in regards to this issue I opened on GitHub: https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/issues/275 I am able to successfully use ldapsearch to query my Samba 4.9.4-Debian DC: ldapsearch -LLL -Y GSSAPI -H ldap://samba-dc.ad.example.com -b "dc=ad,dc=example,dc=com" "(objectClass=user)" "sAMAccountName" However, when I try to use python-ldap I

Hi all! We are bringing out HTTP API for doveadm-server in master HEAD. This feature is experimental, and can be expected to have bugs in it and might not always work. If you feel like trying it out though, you can enable it in your configuration file: doveadm_api_key = some-string service doveadm { inet_listener http { port = 8080 } } To use the API, you can go to

On 2016-04-05 08:44, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> On April 5, 2016 at 9:27 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2016-04-04 20:22, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: >> >> > Since the API is still a little beta, it will not return anything in >> > case >> > doveadm does not like the arguments (that is, calls

I want to (continue to) use Samba code to obtain data needed by my Linux client. This is currently done by calls into Samba's libraries. Unfortunately the resulting rpc traffic is unencrypted. I think this has to do with the configuration of encryption mechanisms on both sides, but perhaps (since when talking to older Windows systems, e.g. Windows 2000) encryption (with NTLM SSP I

Hi, I'm experiencing the following problem when runnig dovecot-1.0-test set up to authenticate users against openldap, while the corresponding setup with dovecot-0.99.11 works fine : . my platform : FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p1 . dovecot version : dovecot-1.0-test57 . openldap version : openldap-2.1.27 - Description : When I talk IMAP to the dovecot server, I can connect on port 143 and

Trying to limit the API calls to doveadm-http-api by configure allowed commands, but once the commands added to the list, the RestAPI no longer work. 1) Return correct reply when doveadm_allowed_commands is empty # curl -k -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: X-Dovecot-API <base64 api key>" https://localhost:9088/doveadm/v1

> On April 5, 2016 at 12:24 PM aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > > > > On April 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > > > > > On 2016-04-05 08:44, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > >> On April 5, 2016 at 9:27 AM Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > >> > > >> > >

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 04:52:38 -0400 Jonathon Reinhart via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm writing in regards to this issue I opened on GitHub: > https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/issues/275 > > I am able to successfully use ldapsearch to query my Samba > 4.9.4-Debian DC: > > ldapsearch -LLL -Y GSSAPI -H

> On 03 January 2019 at 22:45 Ronald Poon <ronaldpoon at ud.hk> wrote: > > > Trying to limit the API calls to doveadm-http-api by configure allowed > commands, but once the commands added to the list, the RestAPI no longer > work. > > > 1) Return correct reply when doveadm_allowed_commands is empty > > # curl -k -H "Content-Type:

Thanks for the example, Rowland. Does ldb work against remote servers as well? I thought it was only for local, file-based access. In general, I just wanted to use my Samba AD as an environment to learn more about writing software against using LDAP. There are a few applications I'm planning to develop, and I'd like to use actual LDAP so they could be applicable to Samba or Microsoft AD

I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting. I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both. I have two shares on the member server and as far as I can tell they are identical. [Projects] works as expected but [Windows] always asks

Here is change log from V3 To V4: - Fixing spelling/grammar mistakes suggested by Randy Dunlap - Changing the hypercall interface to be able to process multiple pages per one hypercall also suggested by Randy Dunlap. It turns out that this will save lots of vmexist/memory slot flushes when protecting many pages. [PATCH RFC V4 1/3] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation [PATCH RFC V4 2/3] KVM:

Hi guys i am usin apache and the fcgi but it cannot see images? i have no idea why i need to leave them outside the public folder and to access the app i use localhost/public/app this is the only way i can c the image other wise its a routin error any ideaS? Its sounds like a rooting error i agree no prob this is my apache config as in the vhost <VirtualHost *> ServerName rails

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory

This patch series is based on the VM introspection patches (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200721210922.7646-1-alazar at bitdefender.com/), extending the introspection API with EPT Views and Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) support. The purpose of this series is to get an initial feedback and to see if we are on the right track, especially because the changes made to add the EPT views are not small

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the first beta of Asterisk 14.0.0. This beta is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 14.0.0-beta1 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following are the issues resolved in this beta: New