similar to: Adding namespace alias_for causes index resync?

I noticed the addition of a new namespace configuration "alias_for". What pracical difference is adding this over and above making namespace aliases hidden and disabling list, as in older versions of dovecot configurations? Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

Hi I'm doing: doveadm force-resync -S director1:1234 -A "*" The director gives this error: Jul 06 16:17:29 auth: Error: Trying to iterate users, but userdbs don't support it Jul 06 16:17:29 doveadm: Error: User listing returned failure Jul 06 16:17:29 doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users The director has "iterate_query" set -- Tom

> Hallo Simon, > >> Anyway, the splitting of large disks has additional advantages. Think of >> what happens in case of a failure (power loss, kernel crash...). With >> the >> disk as one large chunk, the whole disk has to be resynced on restart >> while with smaller segments only those which are marked as dirty have to >> be resynced. This can make a bit

Hallo Simon, > Anyway, the splitting of large disks has additional advantages. Think of > what happens in case of a failure (power loss, kernel crash...). With the > disk as one large chunk, the whole disk has to be resynced on restart > while with smaller segments only those which are marked as dirty have to > be resynced. This can make a bit difference. I am not sure if this is

I have configured 2x 500G sata HDD as Software RAID1 with three partitions md0,md1 and md2 with md2 as 400+ gigs Now it is almost 36 hours the status is cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md1 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0] 4096448 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md2 : active raid1

Hi all, I set up dovecot a couple of months ago and am having trouble getting autoexpunge=30d to work on my Trash and Junk mailboxes. Not sure why not because I'm not getting error messages in my log. Running "doveadm search -u <user> mailbox Junk savedbefore 30d" shows me many messages (I've got messages back to mid-May, and a couple of other users have them back to

Hello, After some fiddling with the server now I have broken RAID1 with the "current" mirror on the disk with few unreadable sectors. If I try to re-add other disk to the mirror resync goes till those bad sectors and then starts from the beginning. And so on. Is it possible to somehow force resync to continue even after errors? Manual resync with dd would require a bit too long

> On 01/11/2023 02:09 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> What I usually do is this: "cut" the large disk into several pieces of >> equal size and create individual RAID1 arrays. Then add them as LVM PVs >> to >> one large VG. The advantage is that with one error on one disk, you wont >> lose redundancy on the whole RAID mirror but only on a partial segment.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Cliff Hayes writes: >> By closing off other avenues other than dovecot imap/pop/lda/etc., >> the indices will stay sync'd. > > I use dovecot's lda and dovecot's sieve filter. Then I'm not sure how mailboxes ever get out of sync. > So it looks like I need to compare the index/mailbox mtimes as you suggest. > > What am I looking for?

We have several CENTOS 4 and 5 servers. ALL CENTOS servers have NTP setup to sync time server. Several days ago due to power outage all servers are reboot. Due to DNS server did NOT up quickly, CENTOS servers start up and can NOT find time server. For CENTOS 5.X servers, it did quickly resync to time server after 30 minutes. For CENTOS 4.X servers, it have been 3 days still NOT sync to time

Hi All, Anyone know the sip header to send to a Linksys to resync it's config file? Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

Has anything changed in updates that would affect md raid1 resync speed? I regularly swap a 750G drive and resync to keep an offsite copy and haven't paid enough attention to known when things changed but it seems to take much longer to sync than it did months ago, even if I unmount the partition and stop most other processes that might compete with it. -- Les Mikesell

I'm experimenting with the Virtual plugin to give users access to folders like "All Mail", "Recent" and so on, similar to Gmail. Something like this works properly: mail_location = maildir:~/ namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = INBOX. separator = . type = private } namespace { prefix = INBOX.virtual. separator = . location =

On 2018-10-05 11:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 17.13, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >>>> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >>>> to this

On 07 Apr 2016, at 14:49, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2016-04-06 21:09, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On 2016-04-06 20:38, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 06 Apr 2016, at 13:43, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>>> I'm switching quota backend to redis (from maildir++), so all my current usages are reset. >>>> I get that

Hi, I'm migrating from Courier to Dovecot and would like to keep the original namespace and add two new ones on the new server. There's only one namespace in Courier which is "INBOX." . The seperator is "." In the new server I would like to have 3 namespaces (private, public, shared) and use "/" as separator. Is it possible to keep "INBOX." for

I could use some help with a corrupt mdbox. doveadm force-resync is crashing (see below), but I really need just to get this account functioning. What's my next step, as far as deleting index files? These were the earliest errors I could find: Nov 28 09:40:21 macy dovecot[6615]: imap(cory at metro-email.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file

Hi, when I specify a slash a mailbox name on the command line of doveadm force-resync, it throws a panic. I'm not sure this is considered a bug. mail01:~# doveadm force-resync -u user1 at example.org / doveadm(user1 at example.org): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 150 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) doveadm(user1 at example.org): Error:

OK todays problem. I have a HP N54L Microserver running centos 6.5. In this box I have a 3x2TB disk raid 5 array, which I am in the process of extending to a 4x2TB raid 5 array. I've added the new disk --> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb And grown the array --> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4 Now the problem the resync speed is v slow, it refuses to rise above 5MB, in general

On 2018-10-04 15:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 4 Oct 2018, at 14.39, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> Is this correct, and if so are there any plans to move dotlocks etc. >> to this directory? > > > What dotlocks? I guess mbox and Maildir have some locks that could be > moved there, but a better performance optimization for those > installations