similar to: make check (pigeonhole)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "make check (pigeonhole)"

2018 Sep 10
1
make check (pigeonhole)
Dovecot list, 1) I downloaded latest dovecot and pigeonhole tar balls and extracted on latest updated CentOS 7 : dovecot-2.3.2.1.tar.gz and dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2.tar.gz 2) I moved pigeonhole (dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2) directory into dovecot (dovecot-2.3.2.1) directory 3) built dovecot with following config and paramerters: patch -p1 <
2018 Sep 10
0
make check (pigeonhole)
I did so as non-root user and got the same error. On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Have you attempted this as non-root user? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch at whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 10/09/2018 18:03 (GMT+02:00) > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: make check
2006 May 12
1
beta8 compile error
Hello, On FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE dovecot-1.0.beta8 build cause the following error : --------------------------------------------- make all-recursive Making all in src Making all in lib if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I /usr/local/include/db41 -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2
2008 Jun 13
2
configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf() call
Hi All, I tried to build dovecot-1.1.rc9 on a HP-UX machine, but failed to configure with the following message: configure: error: You don't appear to have C99 compatible vsnprintf() call The environment is like the following: - command: ./configure - uname: HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64 - aCC version: HP aC++/ANSI C B3910B A.05.55 [Dec 04 2003] Also, I tried to run `./configure CC=c99'
2006 May 13
1
--enable-debug in 1.0beta8
It looks like there is an error in calling check_nuls for DEBUG In src/lib/ mempool-alloconly.c on line 85 you have check_nuls(block->prev, 0), which I think it should be check_nuls(block->prev); Can some developer confirm that? Thank you [root]#./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot --enable-debug Install prefix ...................... : /opt/dovecot File offsets
2005 May 14
6
1.0-test70
http://dovecot.org/test/ - vpopmail authentication fix - many mmap_disable=yes fixes and a few optimizations - pop3 hang fix - mbox fix for "last-uid lost" error (hopefully last one) - mbox fix for losing dirty flag, causing lost message flags mmap_disable=yes seems to be finally working pretty well. There should be no more cache file related errors with it enabled. I'm still
2012 Sep 05
2
Memory leak by getting the virtual size of a IMAP folder
Hi everyone, I am writing a dovecot statistic plugin, which calls the 'mailbox_get_metadata' function with MAILBOX_METADATA_VIRTUAL_SIZE as the 2nd parameter. enum mailbox_status_items metadata_items = MAILBOX_METADATA_VIRTUAL_SIZE; struct mailbox_metadata metadata; mailbox_get_metadata(mailbox, metadata_items, &metadata); but Valgrind finds a memory leak when this function is
2018 Dec 04
2
Compilation error
Hi USing git, I reach the following error (below). Here is my configure parameters : CPPFLAGS="-I/include -I/usr/include/tirpc/" LDFLAGS="-L/lib -ltirpc" ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --libexec=/usr/libexec --with-sql=yes --without-sqlite --with-mysql --with-ssl --without-shadow --without-nss --without-pam --without-ldap --with-zlib
2012 Nov 01
1
2.2.alpha1 (626a9df21e62): LMTP Core Dump
Please find Backtrace for LMTP Core Dump below: [...] ==> /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log <== Nov 1 11:16:14 spectre dovecot: lmtp(17245): Connect from local Nov 1 11:16:14 spectre dovecot: lmtp(17245): Fatal: master: service(lmtp): child 17245 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) ==> /var/log/mail.log <== Nov 1 11:16:14 spectre postfix/lmtp[17204]: 3Xsj4G11MrzNY: to=<tlx at
2017 May 07
6
[RFC v2 0/6] PMU engine counters
reworked this series quite a lot. Now we want the Host to configure the counters through the PMU. The series isn't complete though because it needs: 1. reordering 2. better commit messages but I felt like sending those out before doing a final version. I also found some weird register overwriting issue on the PMU I have to track down, because it interfers with the counter read out. I am
2017 Jun 05
7
[PATCH v3 0/7] PMU engine counters
I think I am done reworking the series and getting to a point where I think it is basically finished. The configuration of the slots could be improved later on when working on dynamic reclocking, but for now it's good enough to report the current GPU utilization to userspace. Patches 1-4 imeplement PMU commands to setup and readout the counters. Patches 5-6 lets Nouveau make use of 1-4. Patch
2014 Aug 17
9
[PATCH 01/10] bios/fan: add support for maxwell's fan management table v2
Re-use the therm-exported fan structure with only two minor modifications: - pwm_freq: u16 -> u32; - add fan_type (toggle or PWM) v2: - Do not memset the table to 0 as it erases the pre-set default values Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> --- drm/Kbuild | 1 + drm/core/include/subdev/bios/fan.h | 1 + drm/core/subdev/bios/fan.c | 1
2016 Feb 08
4
[PATCH 0/4] PMU engine counters
these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for convenience Anyway there are still some issues I would like to discuss: 1. currently the
2016 Feb 16
4
[PATCH v2 0/4] PMU engine counters
these are usually used for dynamic reclocking on gt215 and newer The counters are used to get the load of the core, memory, video and pcie loads currently I expose the loads through a debugfs "current_load" file, but I want to move that to nvif and just add a wrapper around that in debugfs for convenience. Using nvif would have the advantage, that userspace tools can easily get loads
2012 Nov 13
0
older gcc don't know --as-needed
Hi, I have to build dovecot-2.1.10 for SuSE SLES9. /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -fno-builtin-strftime -no-undefined -Wl,--as-needed -o test-lib test_lib-test-lib.o test_lib-test-array.o test_lib-test-aqueue.o test_lib-test-base64.o
2016 Mar 02
4
[PATCH v2 0/4] fix pmu code on gk208+
this series fixes the PMU on falcons v5 which fixes memory recklocking on kepler2 and would also allow us to enable memory recklocking on maxwell Karol Herbst (4): pmu/fuc: fix imm32 for gk208+ pmu/fuc: replace mov+sethi with imm32 pmu/fuc: use the call macro instead of using the call instruction directly pmu/fuc: use imm32 in ld/st macros
2015 Oct 26
9
[PATCH 0/4] Add pdaemon load counters
this series makes use of the load counters we can use to get information about the current load of the gpu. This series includes the needed pmu bits and a debugfs interface to read them out. Currently the values are between 0 and 255, because it is much easier to implement it this way on the pmu. Karol Herbst (4): subdev/pmu/fuc: add gk104 pmu/fuc: add macros for pdaemon pwr counters
2016 Feb 26
8
[PATCH 0/4] fix pmu code on gk208+
while trying out my pmu_counter patches on a gk208 gpu, I notived that the pmu is pretty much screwed up there. Karol Herbst (4): pmu/fuc: fix imm32 for gk208+ pmu/fuc: replace mov+sethi with imm32 pmu/fuc: call# seems to be broken on gk208 pmu/fuc: movw is somewhat weird on gk208, use mov instead drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf100.fuc3.h | 1598 +++++++++++------------
2006 Nov 05
1
RC11 Build Failure on FreeBSD 6.1
I just ran into a build failure on Dovecot 1.0RC11 on FreeBSD 6.1. Identical command sequence for the build worked fine for RC10. uname -a: FreeBSD thor.krellis.org 6.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Sep 1 01:47:32 EDT 2006 root at jail7.jvds.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JAIL7 i386 Configured with a straight ./configure, no options, no problems reported during configure, but make
2020 Feb 17
2
Question about noreplicate flag
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 17.2.2020 12.48, Bernardo Reino wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I've just setup replication between two servers. The e-mail accounts >> on both servers intersect but are not the same. >> >> In dovecot.conf (both are identical except one user /var/mail and the >> other uses /srv/vmail) I have: >> >>