similar to: Update both virtual indexes & FTS indexes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Update both virtual indexes & FTS indexes"

2019 Jun 05
2
FTS Xapian
For my primary namespace this is working fine - thanks to the developers! It also appears to work great for shared folders as well. But my virtual folders aren't returning results - at least not to the client. The logs show FTS Xapian opening several DB files and getting results - but nothing is being returned to client. Is this a config issue on my side or is this a current limitation of
2015 Apr 14
1
Updating Solr - was Disk space usage with mdbox
So with "fts_autoindex=yes" enabled in plugins, is there anything I should be running regularly, other than the expunge/purge, to ensure Solr indexes are updated? I have a daily Solr optimize, and Solr autocommit enabled. I have an hourly "doveadm index -A *" command - is that unneeded? -- Daniel On 4/12/2015 6:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 10 Apr 2015, at 21:55,
2019 Jun 07
1
FTS Xapian
Yes, latest git version. The logs show (as I read them) returned results - yet nothing shows in the client. The logs look the same (with different numbers) when querying "regular" folders - but results are shown in clients. -- Daniel On June 6, 2019 12:16:08 AM Joan Moreau <jom at grosjo.net> wrote: > Hi > Are you using the latest git version ? > WHich part exactly
2019 Jun 05
2
FTS Xapian
Logs: Jun 5 06:02:25 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com)<25877><IjkkJZOKPvKsOk9d>: Opening DB (RO) /var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/sdbox/xapian-indexes/db_f2857830c70c844e2f1d00003bc41c5f Jun 5 06:02:25 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com)<25877><IjkkJZOKPvKsOk9d>: FTS Xapian: FLAG=AND Jun 5 06:02:25 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at
2017 Feb 09
3
Solr 6.4.1
Does this work (pcap attached)? Daniel On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 09.02.2017 07:54, Daniel Miller wrote: >> I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump >> to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my >> schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak >> it work with the new
2012 Feb 25
1
Solr not indexing
What did I do wrong to make this happen? "doveadm(dmiller at amfes.com): Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'" doveadm -D fts rescan -u dmiller at amfes.com doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded:
2015 Apr 10
2
Disk space usage with mdbox
Why things happen is one of the great mysteries and joys of being a sysadmin... As for cleaning up SIS, I believe the "doveadm purge" command takes care of it. I have a daily cronjob which includes: #!/bin/sh # Permanently expunge old Trash doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 2w # Optimize mdbox storage doveadm purge -A # Update fts indexes doveadm fts rescan -A -- Daniel
2017 Feb 09
2
Solr 6.4.1
I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak it work with the new version...it works! I did not copy the database, started from scratch, and executed a "doveadm fts rescan -A". But... Judging solely from at least one
2017 Feb 10
1
Solr 6.4.1
What dovecot version are you using? On 10.02.2017 09:12, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Yeah, thanks. > > It seems that there indeed is content-type header (there should not be). > We'll look into it. > > Aki > > On 10.02.2017 01:44, Daniel Miller wrote: >> Does this work (pcap attached)? >> >> Daniel >> >> On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
2012 Nov 18
4
panic fts_solr for bad attachment
Hi! I use dovecot 2.1.7 on Ubuntu 12.10 with fts_solr und decode2text.sh for indexing attachments. This works great in general. Just for one user there is a problem with an unknown bad attachment. I run "doveadm index -A '*'". After a while I receive: doveadm(xyz): Error: fts_solr: Invalid XML input at line 1: mismatched tag doveadm(xyz): Panic: file solr-connection.c: line
2020 Feb 17
1
Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains
Any thoughts on this? --- Daniel ------ Original Message ------ From: "Daniel Miller" <dmiller at amfes.com> To: "Dovecot Mailing List" <dovecot at dovecot.org> Sent: 2/12/2020 6:16:05 PM Subject: Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains >Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everything else works fine - the problem is with
2011 May 22
2
fts crash
I've completed my mailbox rebuild - theoretically I should be free of corruption. I used dsync to export from mdbox to maildir (so should be clean) then used a virtual machine with Dovecot to import back to mdbox in another location. So...theoretically I should be free of all corruption now... Running an fts update - "doveadm search text -u user at domain.com xyzzyx" works on
2012 Jan 25
4
Crash on mail folder delete
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird. I see the following in the log: Jan 25 15:36:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) Jan 25 15:36:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com): Error: Raw backtrace:
2011 Feb 14
3
Search failure
doveadm search -u dmiller at amfes.com text xyzxyz doveadm(dmiller at amfes.com): Panic: file istream-limit.c: line 79 (i_stream_limit_seek): assertion failed: (v_offset <= lstream->v_size) doveadm(dmiller at amfes.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3ca8a) [0x7fcf3daaca8a] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x32)
2009 Mar 01
1
Remote storage
What options are available for remote storage, i.e. storage devices directly mounted on the machine running Dovecot? I've seen discussions of NFS usage - but my experiences with NFS in times past have been poor. CIFS has worked well for me for non-mail use - would this be suitable? Or is there another method I've not considered? -- Daniel
2010 Dec 01
3
SIS errors - was Error from mobile client (Palm Pre)
Continuing to see errors on this with some new messages. Is it possible this has anything to do with zlib plugin, or possibly having a mix of zlib compressed & uncompressed messages with mdbox? I recently added zlib to deliver plugin list. -- Daniel L. Miller, VP - Engineering, SET AM Fire & Electronic Services, Inc. [AMFES] dmiller at amfes.com 702-312-5276
2009 Mar 02
2
Deliver error - fdatasync_path
I see the following history in my log during message delivery: Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/pickup[21464]: 5FAFC2A002: uid=0 from=<root> Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/cleanup[21526]: 5FAFC2A002: message-id=<20090301213509.5FAFC2A002 at mailserver.amfeslan.local> Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/qmgr[21429]: 5FAFC2A002: from=<root at mailserver.amfeslan.local>,
2018 Sep 02
1
online conversion using replication?
With a single server - and no intent to have a second server online at this time - is it possible to use the replication service to keep a "live" backup? Or otherwise perform a storage format conversion? I'm presently using sdbox - and considering going back to mdbox though without SIS.? My intent now is ONLY a 1-way backup, to be kept current, and no clients will utilize the
2015 Feb 26
2
mdbox attachment errors
Getting some errors like: Feb 26 12:19:43 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller at amfes.com): Error: read(attachments-connector(/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/mdbox/storage/m.7089)) failed: read(/var/mail/attachments/f6/f4/f6f4f3b882bf3488af632389d4aaba8adc332b12-60ab750a1aa4b554da1600009db5accb[base64:18 b/l]) failed:
2011 Feb 16
2
Regenerating mdbox/sis
It's apparent I have some level of corruption in my mailboxes - something to do with the combination of mdbox, sis, and zlib. I should note that I know I have a mix of compressed and raw messages - if that makes any difference in identifying the problems. I think I need to somehow regenerate the mailboxes with issues. Is there a suggestion for how to accomplish this? Should I perhaps use