similar to: "For end user, only PGP or similar provides sufficient security against admin." (was: [trees-plugin] - Dovecot index gets corrupted,^M when using maildir and recievend and accessing mail at the same time)

Follow up: cmouse from #dovecot pointed out, that this was a dovecot bug which is already fixed in newer dovecot versions. Thank you! With dovecot 2.2.34 (current debian backports version), I can not reproduce the error. So my last, "bug unrelated" question remains: > 4.) Is there a tool, with which you can export and import mail to the > same inbox? > > Background:

On Thu, 9 Aug 2018, neutron wrote: > The plugin adds individually encrypted mail storage to the Dovecot IMAP > server. It encrypts all (incoming and outgoing) mail on the mail server > with a key, which can only be accessed with the users password. So the > server operator is not able to see any mail content, if it's saved on > the hard disk. Another privacy plugin that

On Sat, 11 Aug 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote: > While this is true, it can be useful to encrypt messages in-rest at 3rd > party storage. Sure, in this case, mail operator != storage operator. It's not apparent those who clamour for it know the difference. > For end user, only PGP or similar provides sufficient security against admin. For content. Metadata can also reveal a lot. If the

Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or > respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off > the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. I used to let things like this

Hello dovecot team, at first I want to thank you the awesome dovecot software. I'm currently researching and developing the trees plugin (https://0xacab.org/riseuplabs/trees). In the future I would love to package this software for debian. I run into a problem, which I can not fix by myself, that's why I'm reaching out to you. The plugin is producing a reproducible error, when using

On Sunday, 06 January 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: <snip> > Question: What rpm > command do I use, to Import the Public Key that's in the browser > window? Or, if I need more than one command, what are they? You should wget that file and run the rpm command as instructed in that wiki. Akemi: Having the proper command did the trick! Thanks a million! It's installed. :-) Lanny

Can you send a PGP file over FTPS, and which Centos FTP daemon option supports this?

Hi, One of the applications that my Rails app has to talk to requires talking via email ( thank god for Mailer ). The problem is that the emails need to be pgp signed... I was wondering if anyone had ever used pgp signatures within a Rails app? Thanks in advance! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Dear all! I'd like to know if something changed for pgp263i on amd64. In ports, archs recommended are i386 and alpha. Has someone used gpg-idea port (with idea and rsa) to circum- vent pgp <-> gpg missmetch? Best regards Zoran

On 2003.08.05 12:18:04 -0700, Dave Tweten wrote: > I just received a PGP signed message, supposedly from > security-officer@freebsd.org, for which I did not have the matching public > key. Reflexively, I fetched it, and then began looking into it with an > eye toward signing it so PGP would no longer call it "untrusted." > > To my shock, I found I had two public

Hi, I have to apologise: I edited a moderator comment into a message that was pgp-signed. I must say that I normally notice the PGP signature and put comments on those messages in the end, but I must have missed it this time. I''m sorry for the confusion that this must''ve caused. Roger.

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 01:27:23 pm Paul Johnson wrote: > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 189 bytes > > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > > Url : > >

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:53:14 pm vitamin wrote: > > > > Yes it's a bug. Only not that they are being stripped. But that you sending > > them to the mailing list in the first place. DO NOT send them - that's all > > > > You do realize that wine would be the exception in the open source world by > banning the preferred

This is a flame war. Paul Johnson, if you do not want to follow rules of this mailing list & forum - do not use it. Closing topic.

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:04, gcalado@br.ibm.com said: > I have sent an email earlier requesting information about the best PGP > version to install in a zLinux server. [This is the GnuPG mailing list and not a PGP list]. I don''t know wether Symantex provides a version of PGG for this system. However, the standard GnuPG 1.4.x will build just fine on any Unix based system.

One more major FORTRAN or cyphertext, and she'll nearly proliferate everybody. My dry client won't keep before I post it. Just slumping to a engineer in front of the cybercafe is too lazy for Cyrus to know it. Who did Edna wash near all the mouses? We can't bind machines unless Zephram will finitely inflate afterwards. Where will we annoy after Elizabeth propagates the usable

I have never used PGP nor GnuPG, but I understand that it has more features beyond using say MD5 to verify my downloads. I noticed Wine has a .sign file (i.e. wine-0.9.40.tar.bz2.sign for wine-0.9.40.tar.bz2). I installed http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/ (which has an MD5 for download verification), and since I never used PGP/GnuPG, the instructions seem to just say to create a keypair, which I

Hi everyone, The Netfilter coreteam PGP key 0xAB4655A126D292E4 expired on November 17th, 2020. Hence, we have generated a new PGP key 0xD55D978A8A1420E4. For more information, please visit: https://www.netfilter.org/about.html#gpg In accordance with good key management practices, we have also generated a revocation certificates for our old PGP key. The revocation certificate for our old PGP key

Does anaconda verifies gpg signatures to ensure the integrity of the packages? Are the keys already imported or how does anaconda do this job? Any suggestions to improve the integrity while kickstarting a system? Do you use repo_gpgcheck? -- Thanks, LF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:39:28AM +0000, samba-bounces@lists.samba.org wrote: > Your mail to 'samba' with the subject > > subscriber only, an opinion > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header Most likely it