similar to: mdbox+ ALT storage + lazyexpunge

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "mdbox+ ALT storage + lazyexpunge"

2018 May 23
2
lazy_expunge ...
deeper still looks like culprit was fts_enforced = "no" which i removed given default anyway .. still get error [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]# doveadm search -u matt at the-bryants.net mailbox .EXPUNGED/* from noreply at apress.com doveadm(matt at the-bryants.net): Error: fts: Failed to sync mailbox .EXPUNGED: Mailbox doesn't exist: .EXPUNGED 6156a416748c035b5c0b0000ef794dd1
2018 May 23
3
lazy_expunge ...
So I decided to configure this plugin and take it for a test drive .. configured using mdbox (main namespace is Maildir) .. So as per Wiki have the following namespaces defined ... location is held within db ... but basically Maildir:~/Maildir for inbox namespace ==== 8< =============== namespace inbox { list = yes type = private inbox = yes prefix = INBOX/ separator = /
2018 May 23
1
lazy_expunge ...
You should probably exclude the .DUMPSTER folder from quota and FTS plugin { fts_autoindex_exclude = .DUMPSTER quota_ruleN = .DUMPSTER:ignore } Aki On 23.05.2018 13:29, Matt Bryant wrote: > So digging a little deeper it seems this maybe an issue between > fts/fts_lucene and lazy_expunge .. if I disable the fts plugin > > [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]#? doveadm search -u >
2019 Apr 28
1
used Lazyexpunge
I used Lazyexpunge. I tried to create .DELETED without any hints and see that the creation was successful. I want to prevent users from creating .DELETED, what should I do? My settings > plugin { > lazy_expunge = .DELETED/ > } > # > > namespace { > prefix = .DELETED/ > hidden = yes > list = no > separator = / > location =
2018 May 23
0
lazy_expunge ...
On 23.05.2018 13:46, Matt Bryant wrote: > deeper still looks like culprit was > > fts_enforced = "no" > > which i removed given default anyway .. > > still get error > > [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]#? doveadm search -u > matt at the-bryants.net mailbox .EXPUNGED/* from noreply at apress.com > doveadm(matt at the-bryants.net): Error: fts: Failed to
2018 May 23
0
lazy_expunge ...
So digging a little deeper it seems this maybe an issue between fts/fts_lucene and lazy_expunge .. if I disable the fts plugin [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]# doveadm search -u matt at the-bryants.net mailbox .EXPUNGED/Trash from noreply at apress.com 6156a416748c035b5c0b0000ef794dd1 1 search works .. so begs the question whats fts_lucene doing ... rgds Matt > Matt Bryant
2018 Feb 18
2
2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
So virtual/combined was meant to combine INBOX/Sent/Drafts and virtual/all display them in a threaded manner .. at least that was the intention ... rgds Matt > Aki Tuomi <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > 18 February 2018 at 11:10 pm > > Uhm. > > combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails > from Sent and Drafts. > > Not sure what your
2018 Feb 17
4
2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... virtual/all/dovecot-virtual virtual/combined inthread refs x-mailbox INBOX virtual/combined/dovecot-virtual !INBOX INBOX/Sent INBOX/Drafts all When new mail comes I would assume that both virtual mailboxes should actually see the message
2007 Sep 27
2
undelete messages?
I'm using the lazy expunge plugin as configured in: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge The page claims users can undelete messages without assistance from a sysadmin. How is this accomplished? When I try to subscribe to the folders under the EXPUNGED namespace, nothing happens. ~Cory Coager
2018 May 24
1
lazy_expuge + mdbox
To a degree I agree .. given mdbox doesnt delete until purge .. but then would be nice if purge took a dovecot search rather than just ditch everything with refcount=0 ... in that way could say purge everything thats been marked as delete according to a specified criteria. rgds Matt completly unrelated moved mailserver back home and listed on cyren so atm getting bounced by dovecot.fi .. have
2018 May 13
2
dsync migration from maildir layout=fs to maildir seperator / - folders or inbox but not both
Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house move and whilst I could use rsync have been trying to get to grips with dsync. However, I seem to have an issue - my current server specifies mail_location as maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs and my imapc config on new server is as follows ... imapc_host = old.mailserver.host imapc_user = %u imapc_master_user =
2017 Oct 16
2
mdbox + director + nfs
Anyone had any experience they can share using a director setup with NFS and using the mdbox format instead of maildir. Is locking an issue on index files ?? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
2018 Dec 15
3
Overrideing pop delete?
On 12/14/18 3:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > Now that I think about it, even better would be a way to move the messages into an archive box when they are downloaded, this way they will be entirely invisible from the POP3 access, and I can use normal expiry functions to clean out that archive after backup. We do exactly this using the "Lazy Expunge" plugin:
2018 May 13
1
dsync migration from maildir layout=fs to maildir seperator / - folders or inbox but not both
> On 13 May 2018, at 14.07, Matt Bryant <matt at the-bryants.net> wrote: > > Sigh ... ok so had if statement in SQL land that appended LAYOUT=fs if Maildir which explains the non-converting folder layout but NOT why the process is not picking up the actual contents of INBOX ... > Try setting imapc_prefix=INBOX instead of imapc_list_prefix. Sami
2010 Feb 11
1
How to configure Lazyexpunge plugin?
Hi, I tried the plugin but it is not working. Am using virtual mailboxes. I added the following in dovecot.conf then restarted dovecot. Please guide me to the correct configuration. ############################## namespace private { prefix = separator = / inbox = yes } # namespace for lazy_expunge plugin: namespace private { prefix = .EXPUNGED/ separator = / location =
2006 Dec 17
1
Lazy expunge plugin
There's now a plugin called lazy_expunge in CVS. Instead of EXPUNGE expunging the mails directly, they're moved to a mailbox with same name in another namespace where user can still copy the mails back. Also DELETEd mailboxes are moved to another namespace. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge for more information. This is similar to Cyrus's two phase expunge:
2007 Mar 16
2
Lazy expunge
When I try to use it i get undefined symbol: dlopen(/usr/lib/dovecot/pop3/lib02_lazy_expunge_plugin.so) failed: /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3/lib02_lazy_expunge_plugin.so: undefined symbol: namespace_find_prefix Does anyone has this problem or I've compiled it with too agresive flags? Thanx! PS. I've folowed http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge word to word. -- FreeB(eer)S(ex)D(rugs)
2012 Sep 26
1
Plugin "lazy_expunge" and subfolder
Hi Timo, hi all, we want to use the "lazy_expunge" plugin (from dovecot 2.1.10) and had configured it in a test environemnt like described in "http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge" (1 namespace) There are some subfolders from "INBOX" (like "INBOX/SPAM") in a "maildir++" configuration. All actions on first level directories
2018 Apr 26
0
Alt Storage and dsync
Stupid question but if dovecot mdbox is configured using alt path storage on a bi directional dysnc replicated pair of servers ... will the doveadm altmove need to be run on both halves of the cluster ??? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2018 Jul 14
0
mdbox + alt storage + purge = wtf ...
All, Is there a bug in doveadm purge ? Configured alt storage and move messages in inbox to the alternate path all well and good. However, after deleting some messages and running a purge on the mailbox found that all messages got recopied over to primary location. I guess this maybe because its re-writing the file and ditching the purged mail .. but shouldnt it keep a track that they were