similar to: Benchmarks with imaptest

On 4 Jul 2018, at 20.10, Jo?o Paulo Sacchetto Ribeiro Bastos <joaopaulosr95 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Has anybody ever used imaptest to benchmark *ONLY* reads? I'm trying to run a battery of tests in my new cluster and apparently no combination of parameters works, because fetch instruction doesn't run. Below is the command I'm using and its partial

dovecot-1.1.beta16]# gcc imaptest.c -o imaptest -g -Wall -W -I. -Isrc/lib-mail -Isrc/lib -Isrc/lib-imap -Isrc/lib-storage/index/mbox -DHAVE_CONFIG_H src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-from.o src/lib-imap/libimap.a src/lib-mail/libmail.a src/lib/liblib.a imaptest.c: In client_append function: imaptest.c:1492: error: too many arguments for i_stream_create_limit function

Hi, The measurements were created under the following conditions : ? operating system : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.6 (Santiago) kernel in version 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 ? virtual server (VMware) with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) 4vCPU E5649 x 2,526 GHz (2 cores per virtual socket) and 4 GB RAM ? 7,200 RPM SATA 1TB (FC SAN IBM System Storage N3400) ? all file systems had been formated in

Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have much to do with actual performance in real life. Setup: - 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB) - Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU) - CentOS 5 - 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem - Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64 - Dovecot latest hg,

I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the conclusions. Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS filesystem. MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster with ext3. MySQL 5.0.30 backend (innodb): ./imaptest clients=1 - append=100 seed=1 secs=30 msgs=1000000 logout=0

Hello, I'm migrating a mail server from a centos 5 cluster architecture to a centos 6 cluster architecture. The new cluster involves faster machines then the old cluster, and a virtual machine. I use dovecot-2.0.9-5.el6.x86_64, while the old cluster uses dovecot-2.0.1-1_118.el5. Tha mail server uses mysql for the users database, and a local ldap for authentication. The storage is also much

We have done some benchmarking tests using dovecot 2.0.12 to find the best shared filesystem for hosting many users, here I share with you the results, notice the bad perfomance of all the shared filesystems against the local storage. Is there any specific optimization/tunning on dovecot for use GFS2 on rhel6??, we have configured the director to make the user mailbox persistent in a node, we will

http://dovecot.org/patches/1.1/maildir-dirty-syncs.diff This patch adds a new maildir_very_dirty_syncs setting. If set to "yes", Dovecot assumes it's the only one changing the cur/ directory (so other MDAs can add mails to new/ without problems). This makes it possible to avoid rescanning the cur/ directory all the time looking for filenames. It also looks like (in stress testing)

v1.1 plans have changed a bit. I'll release v1.1.alpha1 soon and hope to have a stable v1.1 in a month or two. The rest of the features that didn't make it into v1.1 will go to v1.2. I'll write more about this when v1.1 alpha is released. I also did a bit of benchmarking. v1.1's performance improvements are looking pretty great, it seems to be twice as fast as v1.0. v1.0:

I hacked some command line options into imaptest. I dont think I broke it.. Place into dovecot-source root as usual and compile with: gcc imaptest.c -o imaptest -Wall -W -I. -Isrc/lib -DHAVE_CONFIG_H src/lib/liblib.a As per Timo's instructions. # imaptest -h imaptest [USER at IP:PORTNO] [pass=PASSWORD] [mbox=MBOX] [clients=CC] [msgs=NMSG] [use_authenticate] [PORTNO] USER = template for

I have been testing with imaptest and getting 'stalls', I tried even building from source and static. Even running it on the same host. Anyone knows what I could doing wrong? [@~]# ./imaptest - append=100,0 logout=0 host=192.168.10.44 port=143 user=test2 pass=xxxxxxxx seed=100 secs=240 clients=1 mbox=64kb.mbox box=INBOX/test Logi Sele Appe 100% 100% 100% 1 1 5 1/ 1 0

Greetings - I've now got as far as playing with the imaptest10 test utility to see if I can stress-test our development server. imaptest10 is built against dovecot-1.0rc28 It may just be that I'm excessively heavy handed, but when I let imaptest10 rip with the command... ./imaptest10 user=test%03d host=testserver.imap.york.ac.uk clients=50 mbox=./dovecot.mbox msgs=1000 secs=30

I wasted too much time today doing this, but they do show a few interesting things: 1) mmap_disable=yes is faster than mmap_disable=no. I didn't expect this. I'm not yet sure why this is, but possibly because then it updates the mail index by reading the changes from dovecot.index.log, instead of reopening and re-mmaping dovecot.index. At least that's the biggest difference between

imaptest host=mail04.local port=143 user=xxx pass=xxx mbox=test.mbox [Fri Jan 11 15:09:14 2019] imaptest[7634]: segfault at 1354ff0 ip 0000000001354ff0 sp 00007ffed5d8f558 error 15 [Fri Jan 11 15:09:22 2019] imaptest[7635]: segfault at 2267ff0 ip 0000000002267ff0 sp 00007ffee5890308 error 15 [Fri Jan 11 15:10:47 2019] imaptest[7648]: segfault at 10e6ff0 ip 00000000010e6ff0 sp 00007ffedbb19f98

Hi I'am doing some tests with nginx proxy -> dovecot using imaptest: imaptest user=user host=host pass=pass msgs=50 clients=100 Logi List Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 30% 5% 41 19 10 36 24 39 9 13 11 8 12 100/100 10 12 11 17 24 31 3

Please, unsubscribe me. I really don't want to read this. 12.01.2019 22:47, Stephan Bosch ?????: > > Op 11/01/2019 om 15:13 schreef Marc Roos: >> imaptest host=mail04.local port=143 user=xxx pass=xxx mbox=test.mbox >> >> [Fri Jan 11 15:09:14 2019] imaptest[7634]: segfault at 1354ff0 ip >> 0000000001354ff0 sp 00007ffed5d8f558 error 15 >> [Fri Jan 11 15:09:22

Dear Folks, Using head of imaptest with dovecot 2.1, I am attempting to put a heavy load on the server, with insufficient success. I made 15000 user accounts, put them in to a file, one per line. Then I ran imaptest with ./imaptest userfile=../../imap-test-userlist-15001.txt clients=15001 pass=SECRETPASSWORD But CPU load is only reaching 20. I put an mbox containing 67 messages into

Yes dovecot is showing the inserted messages until the stall. Looks like it is an issue with imap test because I am able to empty the mailbox again via thunderbird. I am comparing write tests to different backends. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Miller [mailto:dmiller at amfes.com] Sent: dinsdag 17 september 2019 22:06 To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re: Imaptest stall On 9/17/2019

http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/ <http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/> I am doing imap testing using imaptest scripts. But, i am unable to append message. APPEND INBOX "15-Jun-2015 05:30:05 -0700" "From:abc at gmail.com" "Subject: test. HI this is msg". This command i am using in my testing script. Command executed properly. But, it is not appending mail

While trying to use imaptest (-20100922, from http://dovecot.org/nightly/imaptest/imaptest-latest.tar.gz) with the included tests directory, it assert-crashes after a suspicious connect() failure: $ ./imaptest user=foo pass=bar host=localhost test=tests Error: connect() failed: No route to host Panic: file test-exec.c: line 903 (test_send_lstate_commands): assertion failed: