similar to: FTS Solr errors using doveadm

Hi all, If I start two o more connections with diferent users that make a search text to solr I get this message many times: Error: fts_solr: Query didn't return uid If I repeat the test about 2000 times, with only one user concurrent, with 60 diferent users, without concurrent, I get between 0. If I repeat the test about 2000 times, with 2 users concurrent, I get between 3 or 10 errors.

On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? I suppose it will. > > Diff between 2 emails: > next uid = 30104 | next uid = 30105 > last_indexed_uid = 30103 |

On 28/05/2018 13:23, kfx wrote: > On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com >> <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing

I am testing the solr FTS following the guide here: http://things.m31.ch/?p=379 Now I am having problem when I try to test: # doveadm -v? index -u fail2ban at mydomain.com Inbox doveadm(fail2ban at mydomain.com): Error: fts_solr: Invalid XML input at 1:0: not well-formed (invalid token) (near: { ? "responseHeader":{ ??? "status":0, ??? "QTime":0, ???

On 4/4/19 6:47 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > For a typical Solr index, 60 seconds is an eternity. Most people aim > for query times of 100 milliseconds or less, and they often achieve > that goal. I'm pretty sure I get these while indexing, not querying. Apr 04 16:44:50 host dovecot[114690]: indexer-worker(me at example.com): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: Request

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser at example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13

On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka": > # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka

Dear R-experts, I need to replace in an expression the character "Cl" by "Cl+beta" But in the following case: form<-expression((Cl-(V *ka) ) +(V *Vm *exp(-(Clm/Vm) *t))) gsub("Cl","(Cl+beta)",as.character(form)) We obtain: [1] "((Cl+beta) - (V * ka)) + (V * Vm * exp(-((Cl+beta)m/Vm) * t))" the character "Clm" has been

On 4/4/19 6:57 PM, Peter Mogensen wrote: > > > On 4/4/19 6:47 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: >> For a typical Solr index, 60 seconds is an eternity. Most people aim >> for query times of 100 milliseconds or less, and they often achieve >> that goal. > > I'm pretty sure I get these while indexing, not querying. > > Apr 04 16:44:50 host

On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com > <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? >>> I suppose it will.

Hello I would like to delete some values at random in a data frame. Does anyone know how I could do? With best regards Caroline

Dear all, I've come across a problem using strptime, can anyone explain what's going on? I'm using version 2.7.0 on Windows XP. Thank you Caroline First read in a data file using read.table alldata = read.table(file, header=F, skip=4, colClasses = c("character","numeric")) dim(alldata) [1] 223960 2 # inefficient, safe way of sorting out missing or dodgy

1. You should always cc the list unless there is a clear reason not to. 2. You still have failed to follow the posting guide: You say you have difficulty troubleshooting your code, but you have shown us no code. You got an error message that seems explicit, but with neither code nor data, I do not know whether anyone can make sense of it. In any case, I certainly cannot. Cheers, Bert Bert

Hi everyone Given that I am not an expert, I am doing tests with Solr, I installed following the guide but I have no benefits on the search, the search on the body on 28000 mails takes a few minutes and then goes to timeout. I had installed version 8.2.0 of solr then I thought that there is something not compatible with centos 7 so I installed version 7.7.0 as an example on the guide

On 6/22/2017 7:05 PM, Caroline wrote: > ##MODISTools example > library(MODISTools) > library(lubridate) > setwd('~/Documents/Modis data') > > #####MODISTools with buffalo data > > ###Read in data rename for easier coding > tbdata <- read.csv('~/Desktop/All TB data for EVI, NDVI.csv') Since this dataset is only on your desktop it cannot help us

##MODISTools example library(MODISTools) library(lubridate) setwd('~/Documents/Modis data') #####MODISTools with buffalo data ###Read in data rename for easier coding tbdata <- read.csv('~/Desktop/All TB data for EVI, NDVI.csv') firstobs <- subset(tbdata, capture.ID == 'B1-1108') firstobs <- firstobs[,c(1,2,2,3,4)] colnames(firstobs) <- c('id',

Dear all, I have a data set as follows: ID cycle.number cycle.result 1 2525 1 38 2 2525 2 38 3 2525 3 25 4 2525 4 25 5 2525 5 25 6 2525

I have tried glm.nb in the MASS package, but many models (I have 250 models with different combinations of predictors for fish counts data) either fail to converge or even diverge. I'm attempting to use the negbin function in the AOD package, but am unsure what to use for the "random" term, which is supposed to provide a right hand formula for the overdispersion parameter.

Hi, I'm using e1071 package to do fuzzy cluster analysis. My dataset (ra) has 5237 observations and 2 variables - depth and velocity. I used fuzzy cmeans to create 6 fuzzy classes. >ra.flcust6<-cmeans(ra,6,iter.max=100,verbose=F,dist="euclidean",method="cmea ns",m=1.7,rate.par=NULL,weights=1) I would like to calculate the value of all the fuzzy validity

Hello I would like to generate covariance matrix with autoregressive structure. I saw some functions in nlme such as corAR1 for example but I don't know how to use it for my goal. Could someone help me or advise me another function? Thank you in advance Caroline