similar to: sieve, pigeonhole; reject message

Hi, I have a problem with my postfix/dovecot configuration, I can't receive mail from outside, i can send a mail from my mail to myself and others, but i can only receive one i send from myself, but when it comes from outside my domains, it dosn't work. Thaks for your help ! Here is my conf : ----------------------------------------------------------------- DOVECOT

Hi, Problem: Sockets /var/spool/postfix/private/auth and /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp are not created The only error message I get comes from postfix: no auth (SASL) founhd. Takes np wonder, the s ockets don't exist. Any help is welcome. Thanks. Bernd doveconf: # 2.1.17: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.11.10-11-default x86_64 openSUSE 13.1 (x86_64) ext4

Hi, I am struggling with Postfix/SASL/Dovecot-IMAP setup with ~/Maildir/ setup. Receiving the mail works fine, but viewing the mail(+listing) is failing. The setup I use is simple unix users from etc/passwd, (pam thru SASL) as I only host for a few people. The ~/Maildir folder has the ownership of the user, not mail or vmail, as I would have expected from the master.cf from Postfix, the

Hello, i already read http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/RefilterMail but it won't work here :( I have many old mails in my folders and need to refilter many of them. But there are many mails without a delivered-to-header. What can i do? Error: Configuration error: envelope_recipient specified header missing (delivered-to:1) Would be okay if getmail would just skip the mail, but it cancels.

Self-explanatory, I hope (note the period on the end of the username); sieve/pigeonhole does not allow you to have senders which end with a period, which means that any UNIX users with such usernames who send mail have it rejected by sieve: # useradd testuser. # su - testuser. $ mail david at example.com -s 'testing' 123 . [testuser. at levi ~]$ logout # less /var/log/maillog Aug 22

Must be non root user as well On 9/12/2018 1:05 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Ok. We have that fix as well but for other reasons.? Good to know this. > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch at whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 12/09/2018 21:36 (GMT+02:00) > To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>, dovecot at

Hi Aki, I needed this patch <https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dovecot.git/tree/dovecot-2.3.0.1-libxcrypt.patch> (fedora): |diff -up dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c --- dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt 2018-02-28 15:28:58.000000000 +0100 +++ dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c 2018-03-27 10:57:38.447769201 +0200 @@

Hello, does someone know, how far the implementation of enotify - xmpp is. Would be nice to push notifications to an jabber account for specific filtered mails. Regards, Ingo

HI, > You could set > > syslog_facility = local5 > > and have all the log messages in the messages file. According to the output of command # doveadm log find every type of message goes to the file I was looking at, "/var/spool/maillog". >> So, is it postfix doing the local mail delivery, not dovecot? >> > To answer this question please post relevant

i've installed rpm -qa | grep dovecot dovecot-2.3.10.1-1.fc32.x86_64 dovecot-pigeonhole-2.3.10.1-1.fc32.x86_64 i'm setting up imapsieve spam reporting; following, https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/spam_reporting/ https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve https://wiki.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples my config currrently includes protocol imap {

Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs. Anyone know if this is possible now (to forgo the NDR)'s or do we need to wait for ereject ? If so, how much work

Am 14.01.2015 um 01:28 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) > > Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs and what would that change? nothing if you think about how

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:23 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> and what would that change? >> nothing if you think about how mail works! >> >> * the MTA receives the message >> * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code >> * later the delivery server rejects >> * the MTA

Am 14.01.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Robert Blayzor: > On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD >> >> why do you want the burden of

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you

All, Thank you for having this list, and I have a question regarding why postfix is not handing off delivery to Dovecot to virtual users. Here is all I can offer since I am not at my server: *Here is the debug information for my postfix setup:* [code] Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: name_mask: ipv4 Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: inet_addr_local: configured 2

Hello, I've finished up work on a new plugin for Pigeonhole Sieve: sieve_pipe. It adds a new Sieve extension (vnd.dovecot.pipe) providing a new action command that provides the possibility to pipe messages to external programs (e.g. shell scripts). The programs available to this command are explicitly limited and subject to administrator configuration. The plugin can currently only be

Hi, We've recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.2.15 with Sieve 0.1.18 (Debian Squeeze) to Dovecot 2.1.8 and Pigeonhole 0.3.1. We provide a selection of global sieve scripts to make users' lives easier and one noticed that some of these have stopped working. I tracked it down to them having personal scripts with the same name. Using a really simple sieve script: require "include";

Hello, Dovecot. I want to migrate to webmail (roundcube) over dovecot + sieve (pigeonhole). Now I'm using on-client (The Bat!) filters, but I need to have acccess to my mail everywhere, not only on my workstation. And I wonder, is here simple way to re-filter INBOX after sieve filters have been changed? Any offline (desktop) mail client could run new filters on old messages -- is