similar to: install dovecot 2.2.35 debian jessie

Hi, did you check in unstable ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot 2018-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com>: > hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a > stretch-backport repos, right? > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK -

Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? > I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. > >

Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing? I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos. The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get install it. I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple

Hello, The following errors are constantly popping up for 2 accounts. I can't get it fixed, I did doveadm backup to another account, the same happens in the new account. I did doveadm force-resync, the problem persists. I'm using dovecot 2.2. 2017-08-18T11:46:12.472821881Z Aug 18 11:46:12 lmtp(ramon.lacerda at alliar.com): Warning: mdbox

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? > > Hello Aki, yes I did that, but I didn't remove the map files first (I don't know if that's required). I can do it again if needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil*

Hi, I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're missing. Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage that thousands of "m." files are still there, summing up 19GB of files. doveconf -n http://termbin.com/7lgc I have tried: accessing via IMAP accessing via doveadm search/fetch/mailbox status doveadm index doveadm

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate their > local caches and > redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies. > > Sami > > I don't think so. Been using imapsync for large scale migrations from external servers to our dovecot setup. Users

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > This is fixed in next release (2.2.32) with > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c8be394 > > Aki Tuomi > As this is still a release candidate, I'm thinking of running an isolated instance of this version, and do doveadm force-resync just to fix just this user's mailbox. What do you

hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a stretch-backport repos, right? Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in > Debian

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> > wrote: > >> >> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate >> their local caches and >> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies. >> >> Sami

Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. Thank you! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Cedric M <cedric.malitte at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > did you check in unstable ? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot

Hi! 2.2.35 is not unstable, but apparently it is in debian distribution, which is called 'unstable'. Aki On 27.04.2018 06:16, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* > > On

I am testing Solr FTS on dovecot. Read online that some suggested to run cronjob commit every minute, and optimize once a day. I am using Solr 7.1.0 and I see some configurations: In /etc/default/solr.in.sh: #SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dsolr.autoSoftCommit.maxTime=3000" #SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dsolr.autoCommit.maxTime=60000" Also in solrconfig.xml: ??? <autoCommit>

Hi Friends, I would like to ask you a suggestion: I need to migrate a imap server to a new one and then dismiss the old one. Reading from relative Dovecot documentation page (https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration), more tools are shown: UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch. The each mail servers are Linux based, one of this (mine) is Dovecot. Based on your experience which of

Hi, often I run into the situation where a dovecot server goes down for maintenance, and all users get concentrated in the remaining dovecot server (considering I have 2 dovecot servers only). When that dovecot server comes back online, director server will send new users to it, but the dovecot server that was up all the time will still have tons of clients mapped to it. I suggest the director

Hey guys, Has anybody ever used imaptest to benchmark *ONLY* reads? I'm trying to run a battery of tests in my new cluster and apparently no combination of parameters works, because fetch instruction doesn't run. Below is the command I'm using and its partial output imaptest/src/imaptest host=$SERVER_IP port=143 user=teste%d at example%d.com pass=$TEST_PASS users=10 domains=10

Hello Jack, yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on cephfs. Thanks for the advise. I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was true in sdbox too. Thanks again. We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore backend. We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes and readings.

Hi, I'd like to achieve the following setup whit dovecot using multiple servers : - one server dedicated to all client IMAP (TLS) connections (i <http://mail.numeezy.com>map.mymaindomain.com, see below ) - each backend server has it's own local storage. no replication - each backend server responsible of a few domains - each backend server has it's own Mysql local database for