Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5"
2018 Apr 21
1
Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5
On 4/20/2018 8:53 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
>> Hi (Stephan?),
>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of
>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ?
>>
>> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C
>> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.
>> It is not a
2018 Apr 23
2
Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5
On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp:
>> Hi (Stephan?),
>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of
>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ?
>>
>> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C
>> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.
2018 Apr 20
2
Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5
OK, I found a solution:
trusted_users = exim:dovecot
in my exim.conf fixed it.
Anyway this is an important change of behavour between 2.2 und 2.3
In 2.2 the "dovecot" under exims "trusted_users" was not necessary.
Olaf
On 04/20/2018 02:53 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
>> Hi (Stephan?),
>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3
2018 May 09
2
lmtp panic with many recipients
* Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>:
>
>
> Op 08/05/2018 om 10:34 schreef Olaf Hopp:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC"
> > Delivering it from exim to dovecot lmtp panics (see below)
> > Panic: file smtp-address.c: line 533 (smtp_address_write): assertion
> > failed:
2018 Apr 20
0
Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5
On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> Hi (Stephan?),
> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of
> a redirected mail or simply a bug ?
>
> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C
> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.
> It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces
> for various
2018 May 08
3
lmtp panic with many recipients
Hi,
I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC"
Delivering it from exim to dovecot lmtp panics (see below)
Panic: file smtp-address.c: line 533 (smtp_address_write): assertion failed: (smtp_char_is_qpair(*p))
# 2.3.1 (c5a5c0c82): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.devel (61b47828)
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS
2018 Apr 24
0
Sieve "redirect" changes envelope sender in 2.3. / pigeonhole 0.5
On 04/23/2018 03:46 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp:
>>> Hi (Stephan?),
>>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of
>>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ?
>>>
>>> A sends
2018 May 09
2
lmtp panic with many recipients
On 05/09/2018 11:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 09/05/2018 om 10:17 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt:
>> * Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>:
>>>
>>> Op 08/05/2018 om 10:34 schreef Olaf Hopp:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC"
>>>>
2020 Mar 30
2
replication and spam removal ("doveadm expunge")
Hello everybody,
since now I did no replication and spam is delivered into users folder "spambox"
Every night there is a cronjob which deletes spam older than 30 days via something like
"find .... -ctime +30 -delete"
Now I'm going to set up replication (two way) and I thought that
doing "rm" is not a good idea.
So I modified the job to something like
2017 Jun 06
3
v2.2.30.1 released
On 06/05/2017 11:05 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> I have updated my dovecot proxy servers from 2.2.28 to 2.2.30. Since the upgrade I'm having the error:
>
> Jun 5 10:54:51 musio12 dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 63632 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped)
>
>
Me too, with
# 2.2.30.1 (eebd877): /opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole
2020 Apr 04
2
replication and spam removal ("doveadm expunge")
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge ....
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Aki
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
2015 Dec 18
2
autoexpunge problems
Hello,
I tried to use the new autoexpunge for my Trash folders
I had in 15-mailboxes.conf
mailbox Trash {
special_use = \Trash
auto = subscribe
}
(dovecot -n of the original config is below)
and added just the line
autoexpunge = 1h
Just a short period on my test system.
But it failed. In the log I see
Dec 18 10:54:07 irams2 dovecot: imap(ms2test): Error: Failed to autoexpunge
2017 Jul 26
1
under another kind of attack
Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote:
> And I have a new one just for "unknown user" and here my bantime and findtime
> are much bigger and the retries are just '2'. So here I'm much harsher.
> I'll keep an eye on my logs and maybe some more twaeking is necessary.
Just be careful about typos (like twaeking!): users could simply misspell
their username,
2017 Jul 29
1
under another kind of attack
Hi to all,
@Olaf Hopp I've this filter enabled for fail2ban, my question is: could
my filters overlap or interfere with those suggested by you?
this is my filter:
Contents of /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf:
[postfix]
# Ban for 10 minutes if it fails 6 times within 10 minutes
enabled = true
port = smtp,ssmtp
filter = postfix
logpath = /var/log/mail.log
maxretry = 6
bantime = 600
2017 Jul 27
1
under another kind of attack
> On 26 Jul 2017, at 7:57 pm, Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear collegues,
>
> many thanks for your valuable input.
>
> Since we are an university GEO-IP blocking is not an option for us.
> Somestimes I think it should ;-)
>
> My "mistake" was that I had just *one* fail2ban filter for both cases:
> "wrong password" and
2020 Mar 20
1
Not able to start dovecot
Am 19.03.2020 um 16:28 schrieb Adam Raszkiewicz:
> I was able to solve errors below but now it complains about the startup how is handled on Centos7:
>
> ? dovecot.service - LSB: Dovecot init script
> Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/dovecot; bad; vendor preset: disabled)
> Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-03-19 15:15:37 UTC; 54s ago
> Docs:
2017 Jul 25
10
under another kind of attack
Hi folks,
"somehow" similar to the thread "under some kind oof attack" started by "MJ":
I have dovecot shielded by fail2ban which works fine.
But since a few days I see many many IPs per day knocking on
my doors with wron password and/or users. But the rate at which they are knocking
is very very low. So fail2ban will never catch them.
For example one IP:
Jul 25
2017 Sep 07
5
password reset
This is off topic, but I am not sure where to go.
I have a local user who cannot login because of a forgotten password, so I went to reset her password with
sudo passed <user>
Which appears to work, asking for a new password and a confirmation. No error occurs (unless I give it unmatched passwords), but the password is not changed.
if I try to change the password in the user's
2017 May 29
3
SSL problem - no banner
Hi,
I am running dovecot 2.2.22-1ubuntu2.4 on a ubuntu 16.04 server. It has
a valid Letsencrypt certificate but the problem also happens with a
self-digned one.
Only openssl s_client -connect localhost:993 works fine and fast, while
all MUA's and telnet does not. Telnet timeouts waiting for banner after
a minute or so:
root at netuno:~# openssl s_client -connect localhost:993
2015 Mar 12
2
Why is Sieve trying to re-compile global scripts?
On 3/12/2015 11:56 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
>>> Please see the thread with subject
>>> "Sieve permissions issue following update"
>>> I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month
>>> on the hint of Stephan. Yesterday I started to test the currenr RCs.