similar to: Accentuated email addresses stored in LDAP

On 19/03/2018 07:23, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Andr? Rodier wrote: > >> I had to use base64 encoding to store email addresses, because they >> are >> rejected otherwise, with an error message of illegal characters. I >> also > > you are using the stock "mail" attribute

On 19.03.2018 07:58, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 18.03.2018 um 23:25 schrieb Andr? Rodier: >> Every other alias works, but not those with accents. They are correctly >> stored in the LDAP database, using base64. > > Why do you even think a character like '?' would be legal in the local > part of an email address? > > Alexander > Hi! This is slightly more

On 2019-04-05 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot > doesn?t > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by > another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was > the answer then, see >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Andre Rodier wrote: > In fact, I am using the otherMailBox attribute, from the standard OpenLDAP > distribution, which is also IA5String. > > - Is there any way in Dovecot to encode the fields in base 64, to send > queries? as the query is "eq", this would be enough, I think. Check out:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Andr? Rodier wrote: > I had to use base64 encoding to store email addresses, because they are > rejected otherwise, with an error message of illegal characters. I also you are using the stock "mail" attribute in LDAP as: olcAttributeTypes: ( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3 NAME ( 'mail'

On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 11:19 +0200, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote: > On 06/04/2019 10:07, Andr? Rodier via dovecot wrote: > > On 05/04/2019 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > > > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > > > > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t > > > have SMTPUTF8 support

On 05/04/2019 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by > another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was > the answer then, see >

On 19/03/18 06:30, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 19.03.2018 07:58, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> Am 18.03.2018 um 23:25 schrieb Andr? Rodier: >>> Every other alias works, but not those with accents. They are correctly >>> stored in the LDAP database, using base64. >> >> Why do you even think a character like '?' would be legal in the local >>

Am 18.03.2018 um 23:25 schrieb Andr? Rodier: > Every other alias works, but not those with accents. They are correctly > stored in the LDAP database, using base64. Why do you even think a character like '?' would be legal in the local part of an email address? Alexander

Hello Could you plese 1. send the full output of doveconf -n 2. Check the SOLR logs for any errors 3. Describe your dovecot architecture, ie. if you are running a single backend or a more complex configuration. 4. Provide a backtrace of the core dump using the instructions on https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html br, Teemu On 04.05.2018 01:13, Andr? Rodier wrote: > On 02/05/18 22:17, Andr?

On 02/05/18 11:45, Andr? Rodier wrote: > On 2018-05-01 21:29, Andr? Rodier wrote: >> On 2018-05-01 07:22, Andr? Rodier wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to use Doevecot fts, with solr the script provided. >>> >>> To rebuild the index, I use the command: >>> doveadm -D index -u mirina 'inbox' >>> >>> To

On 5 Apr 2019, at 13:47, Andr? Rodier via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> root at portal:/etc/postfix# postmap -q andr?@homebox.space ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf >> andre at homebox.space You have a solution that properly maps UTF to a non-UTF namespace. As I understand it, SMTPUTF8 uses a UTF8 namespace. So, this would indicate SMTPUTF8 # postmap -q

On 02/05/18 22:17, Andr? Rodier wrote: > On 02/05/18 11:45, Andr? Rodier wrote: >> On 2018-05-01 21:29, Andr? Rodier wrote: >>> On 2018-05-01 07:22, Andr? Rodier wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to use Doevecot fts, with solr the script provided. >>>> >>>> To rebuild the index, I use the command: >>>>

On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me> wrote: >Hello Mike, > >Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a >dynamic one. > >Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as >long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. > >Unfortunately, some ISPs are

On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a >virtual >server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home >record >on dynamic dns. It's really effective. > >On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" ><fsantiago at

On 31/03/18 09:29, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/31/2018 om 9:27 AM schreef Andr? Rodier: >> Hello, >> >> I am using a custom directory for sieve logs and trace and it apparently >> generate an error, in some corner case. >> >> - I have an IMAP global sieve script, that is run when appending emails >> into the "Archives" folder. >> - I

On December 10, 2017 5:25:46 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: >Which part? Hosting the email server at home or the relay in the >cloud? > >On Dec 10, 2017 14:53, "Fabian A. Santiago" ><fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> >wrote: > >> On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> >wrote: >> >I have

Hello Mike, Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a dynamic one. Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials. Kind regards, Andr? On

I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a virtual server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home record on dynamic dns. It's really effective. On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me> >

Which part? Hosting the email server at home or the relay in the cloud? On Dec 10, 2017 14:53, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: > >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a > >virtual > >server in the cloud as my mx record