similar to: Dovecot 2.2.34 FTS-SOLR = inconsistent results

Hi Bill, I put stringsAsFactors = FALSE still did not work. tdat <- read.table(textConnection("A B C Y A12 B03 C04 0.70 A23 B05 C06 0.05 A14 B06 C07 1.20 A25 A23 A12 3.51 A16 A25 A14 2,16"),header = TRUE ,stringsAsFactors = FALSE) tdat$D <- 0 tdat$E <- 0 tdat$D <- (ifelse(tdat$B %in% tdat$A, tdat$A[tdat$B], 0)) tdat$E <- (ifelse(tdat$B %in% tdat$A, tdat$A[tdat$C], 0))

Use the stringsAsFactors=FALSE argument to read.table when making your data.frame - factors are getting in your way here. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Val <valkremk at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Rui, > I did not get the desired result. Here is the output from your script > > A B C Y D E > 1 A12 B03 C04 0.70 0 0

Thank you Rui, I did not get the desired result. Here is the output from your script A B C Y D E 1 A12 B03 C04 0.70 0 0 2 A23 B05 C06 0.05 0 0 3 A14 B06 C07 1.20 0 0 4 A25 A23 A12 3.51 1 1 5 A16 A25 A14 2,16 4 4 On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hello, > > Here is one way. > > tdat$D <- ifelse(tdat$B %in% tdat$A,

Hello, Here is one way. tdat$D <- ifelse(tdat$B %in% tdat$A, tdat$A[tdat$B], 0) tdat$E <- ifelse(tdat$B %in% tdat$A, tdat$A[tdat$C], 0) Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 12/13/2017 9:36 PM, Val wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a data frame > tdat <- read.table(textConnection("A B C Y > A12 B03 C04 0.70 > A23 B05 C06 0.05 > A14 B06 C07 1.20 > A25 A23 A12 3.51

Hi all, I have a data frame tdat <- read.table(textConnection("A B C Y A12 B03 C04 0.70 A23 B05 C06 0.05 A14 B06 C07 1.20 A25 A23 A12 3.51 A16 A25 A14 2,16"),header = TRUE) I want match tdat$B with tdat$A and populate the column values of tdat$A ( col A and Col B) in the newly created columns (col D and col E). please find my attempt and the desired output below Desired output

I was working with the rmetrics portfolioBacktesting function and dug into the code to try to find why my formula with 113 items, i.e. A1 thru A113, was being truncated and I only get 85 items, not 113. Is it due to a string length limitation in R or is it a bug in the strsplit or gsub functions, or in my string? I'd very much appreciate any suggestions ============Input script:

Dear R users, I have a data frame with one column (4000 rows) containing name codes (factor with 63 levels). I would like to associate each name with a particular Type (coded as 1,2,3,4,H or H1) in a second column. Is it possible to do a lookup table of associations (i.e. A23 is of type 1, A13 is of type 3 ...) so as to fill up automatically the $Type column. df() $Source $Type A23 A24 A9 A32

Hi All I am having 2 very long character strings (550chars) and I want to put them as expressions together with c(). The problem is that I also get these double-quotes, as seen below in 'fct'. How can I remove these double-quotes? I tried as.name() but it did not work (because of size?). These are creating trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some

I realize this should be simple, but even after reading over the several help pages several times, I still cannot decide between the myriad "apply" functions to address it. I simply want to apply a function to all the rows (or columns) of the same index from two (or more) identically sized arrays (or data frames). For example: > a=matrix(1:50,nrow=10) >

On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com > <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? >>> I suppose it will.

On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does the UID in "fts" header keep changing every time you save a new mail? I suppose it will. > > Diff between 2 emails: > next uid = 30104 | next uid = 30105 > last_indexed_uid = 30103 |

On 28/05/2018 13:23, kfx wrote: > On 28/05/2018 13:04, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 28 May 2018, at 13.28, kfx <kadafax at gmail.com >> <mailto:kadafax at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Especially what is in the "fts" header vs. "next uid" header? Does >>>> the UID in "fts" header keep changing

Hi, I am having difficulty in getting the outlook 2010 to connect to my server running on Ubuntu Server 10.04. I can login to Squirrelmail webmail, and am able to send & receive emails through squirrelmail with no problem whatsoever. However, this morning, I was trying to add a new account for the same user on Outlook 2010 and I got the following error from outlook as follows Send test

On 24/05/2018 15:33, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: >> >> Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >>> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? >> >> Same (wrong) result: >> 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body >> >> 2. Search against

Dovecot version: 2.1.rc1 Expat version: expat-2.0.1-10 Libcurl version: libcurl-7.21.0-10 OS: Fedora 14 i686 Configure command: ./configure --with-solr Solr version: 1.4.1 (also tried 3.5.0) Java version: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-55.1.9.10 (also tried Oracle Java 6u29) [root at mymailserver ~]# doveadm -D index -u username mailbox inbox doveadm(username): Info: INBOX: Caching mails

Hi there, Does anyone know how to do this: "Put all the certificates in the ssl_cert file. For example when using a certificate signed by TDC the correct order is: Dovecot's public certificate TDC SSL Server CA TDC Internet Root CA Globalsign Partners CA " I try to set these parameters in the conf.d/10-ssl.conf as below, but it seems doesn't work. ---

hi list, i wrote a small tool in java which transfers all mails from one imap-server account to another imap-server account using the javax.mail API. when i use cyrus as source and destination imap server everything is fine. when i use dovecot as destination server occasionally exceptions occur when appending the mails. i was not able to see what's really going wrong so i used wireshark to

We have recently digitized a set of points from some scanned engineering drawings (in the form of PDFs). The digitization resulted in x,y page coordinates for each point. The scans were not aligned perfectly so there is a small rotation, and furthermore each projection (e.g. the yz-plane) on the drawing has a different offset from the page origin to the projection origin. From the dimensions

Hi list. I'm using dovecot as postfix's LDA. The version is 2.3.6. Last week some spammer set the envelope's FROM to "foo at bar@domain.com" (with two @). While trying to deliver (as this one didn't hit the spamassassin's score), dovecot said the following: Jun 21 02:35:58 mymailserver postfix/pipe[29736]: ADA268195E: to=<user at mydomain>, relay=dovecot,

On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka": > # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka