similar to: 2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?"

2018 Feb 18
0
2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
Uhm. combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails from Sent and Drafts. Not sure what your all folder is supposed to do. Aki On 2018-02-18 01:14, Matt Bryant wrote: > Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- > > I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... > > >
2018 Feb 18
2
2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
So virtual/combined was meant to combine INBOX/Sent/Drafts and virtual/all display them in a threaded manner .. at least that was the intention ... rgds Matt > Aki Tuomi <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > 18 February 2018 at 11:10 pm > > Uhm. > > combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails > from Sent and Drafts. > > Not sure what your
2018 May 13
1
dsync migration from maildir layout=fs to maildir seperator / - folders or inbox but not both
> On 13 May 2018, at 14.07, Matt Bryant <matt at the-bryants.net> wrote: > > Sigh ... ok so had if statement in SQL land that appended LAYOUT=fs if Maildir which explains the non-converting folder layout but NOT why the process is not picking up the actual contents of INBOX ... > Try setting imapc_prefix=INBOX instead of imapc_list_prefix. Sami
2018 May 13
2
dsync migration from maildir layout=fs to maildir seperator / - folders or inbox but not both
Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house move and whilst I could use rsync have been trying to get to grips with dsync. However, I seem to have an issue - my current server specifies mail_location as maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs and my imapc config on new server is as follows ... imapc_host = old.mailserver.host imapc_user = %u imapc_master_user =
2017 Aug 03
1
rawlog
> On August 3, 2017 at 8:57 PM Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > > > Am 03.08.2017 um 01:04 schrieb Matt Bryant: > > Hi, > > > > Trying to get rawlog working on dovecot 2.2.31 configured as per > > > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog > > > > but > > > > a) it doesnt appear to be loggin anything
2017 Oct 16
2
mdbox + director + nfs
Anyone had any experience they can share using a director setup with NFS and using the mdbox format instead of maildir. Is locking an issue on index files ?? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
2018 Feb 18
0
2.2.33.2 - Virtual Mailbox Issue bug maybe ?
hmm down graded to 2.2.19 and dont see the issue .. other issues particularly a segfault in libstorage to do with virtual .. but at least mails seem to be appearing correctly and cant seem to replicate what I have seen in 2.2.33.2 as an aside .. outlook on mac doesnt appear to like 2.2.33.2 either .. seeing same kind of issue where some messages not appearing in inbox .. but could be some
2017 Aug 02
2
rawlog
Hi, Trying to get rawlog working on dovecot 2.2.31 configured as per https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Debugging/Rawlog but a) it doesnt appear to be loggin anything b) rawlog_dir which is supposed to be v2.2.26+ seems no where in site .. in fact complains about unknown variable So does rawlog still do anything ???? Or am I missing something ... config is below .... # 2.2.19:
2018 May 13
0
dsync migration from maildir layout=fs to maildir seperator / - folders or inbox but not both
Sigh ... ok so had if statement in SQL land that appended LAYOUT=fs if Maildir which explains the non-converting folder layout but NOT why the process is not picking up the actual contents of INBOX ... Matt > Matt Bryant <mailto:matt at the-bryants.net> > 13 May 2018 at 8:01 pm > Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house > move and whilst I could use
2018 Apr 12
0
EuroLLVM "Round Table" topics
On 04/12/2018 01:40 AM, p23 power via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - > formally known as hackers lab).  The round table sessions are a great > way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have > scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up > on those
2018 May 23
2
lazy_expunge ...
deeper still looks like culprit was fts_enforced = "no" which i removed given default anyway .. still get error [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]# doveadm search -u matt at the-bryants.net mailbox .EXPUNGED/* from noreply at apress.com doveadm(matt at the-bryants.net): Error: fts: Failed to sync mailbox .EXPUNGED: Mailbox doesn't exist: .EXPUNGED 6156a416748c035b5c0b0000ef794dd1
2018 Apr 11
2
EuroLLVM "Round Table" topics
Hi, We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - formally known as hackers lab). The round table sessions are a great way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up on those conversation-topics. We will also setup round tables during the event when there is interest (i.e.
2018 May 23
3
lazy_expunge ...
So I decided to configure this plugin and take it for a test drive .. configured using mdbox (main namespace is Maildir) .. So as per Wiki have the following namespaces defined ... location is held within db ... but basically Maildir:~/Maildir for inbox namespace ==== 8< =============== namespace inbox { list = yes type = private inbox = yes prefix = INBOX/ separator = /
2018 May 23
1
lazy_expunge ...
You should probably exclude the .DUMPSTER folder from quota and FTS plugin { fts_autoindex_exclude = .DUMPSTER quota_ruleN = .DUMPSTER:ignore } Aki On 23.05.2018 13:29, Matt Bryant wrote: > So digging a little deeper it seems this maybe an issue between > fts/fts_lucene and lazy_expunge .. if I disable the fts plugin > > [root at stargate dovecot.rawlog]#? doveadm search -u >
2012 Dec 18
6
dovecot index errors since 2.1.12
Hi, After upgrading to dovecot 2.1.12, I see a lot of these errors: # 2.1.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # Filesystem: ext4 with mdbox storage Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (5010 < 8192) Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org):
2018 Feb 18
1
Dovecot says the message was stored into a Spam mailbox but it's not there
Hi, I have a problem with storing messages into a Spam folder by dovecot. Log says that message was stored into Spam mailbox but when I check there is no message in users's Spam mailbox. cat /var/log/mail.log | grep sieve | grep Spam : *Feb 17 05:09:11 mailserver dovecot: lda(user at domain): sieve: msgid=<b599df639ffa4d20f6e8d2bcff791286 at somedomain.pl>: stored mail into
2020 Aug 25
2
zlib errors after upgrading
> On 25/08/2020 14:35 Robert Nowotny <rnowotny at rotek.at> wrote: > > > I get ZLIB Errors after dovecot upgrade from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3 > > > Aug 21 15:27:34 lxc-imap dovecot: imap(acsida)<63870><jZk...>: Error: Mailbox Sent: UID=40826: read(zlib(/home/vmail/virtualmailboxes/acsida/storage/m.2409)) failed:
2020 Jan 08
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: Thunderbird Subscription missing
Phillip> Users don?t create these folder. The system does based on the Phillip> configuration which is what I have to figure out. Then post your configuration details! And details on how email gets into the system and into Dovecot.
2017 Feb 09
1
dovecot logout issues
hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.
2020 Sep 07
2
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you