similar to: lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart"

2018 Jan 31
2
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Hello, On 31.01.2018 22:35, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann: >> Hello, >> >> Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog: >> >>> lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid >> character in localpart >> >> dovecot-lda still exits with 0 and the mail is inserted
2018 Jan 31
0
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Op 1/31/2018 om 10:44 PM schreef Christian Authmann: > Hello, > On 31.01.2018 22:35, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog: >>> >>>> lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid >>>
2018 Jan 31
0
lda: Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid character in localpart
Op 1/31/2018 om 6:17 PM schreef Christian Authmann: > Hello, > > Sometimes, when delivering mails, this warning appears in my syslog: > > > lda(...): Warning: Failed to parse return-path header: Invalid > character in localpart > > dovecot-lda still exits with 0 and the mail is inserted into my inbox. > > > Looking at the mails in question, I determined that the
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name. By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1) A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org> "A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org> are legal, but A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org> is
2019 Feb 11
2
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
Hi, in src/lib-smtp/smtp-address.c line 759 the localpart is compared with null_strcmp, which does not ignore the case. While this is the correct behavior (according to the RFC) it causes problems in real life. In my case the vacation notices are not sent, if someone writes to First.Last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de because :addresses contains (only) first.last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de. Regards,
2019 Feb 12
1
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:12:43AM +0100, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote: >On 11/02/2019 22:43, Andreas Jobs via dovecot wrote: >In practice if you convert the username part to lower case in the MTA >then you will accept mail with mixed case but only have to deal with >lowercase in Dovecot. Yes, but the vacation action (also) compares :addresses against the header to|cc|sender... And
2006 Mar 14
8
email address parse
hi all how to parse such email string to a array: #-------------------------------------------- "joe black"<joe_1@joe_black.com> joe_2@joe_black.com, joe_3@joe_black.com #-------------------------------------------- seems emails from user input include various format. and i have to split them to a array. any idea? regards. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2020 Feb 18
1
Message-id parsing by sieve
Hi, I'm using Dovecot for my mail with pigeonhole's sieve extension, from debian stable (2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4)). One of the sieve stanzas that I use is for duplicate elimination: if duplicate { discard; stop; } This mostly works fine, but I seem to have trouble with some messages that come from certain domains where duplicates are not eliminated. >From
2017 Aug 24
2
vacation problem with SRS
i Cant compile piegeon hole from github with this feature: 2822.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rfc2822.o *edit-mail.c:* In function '*edit_mail_set_cache_corrupted*': *edit-mail.c:1665:3:* *error: *too many arguments to function ' *edmail->wrapped->v.set_cache_corrupted*' (&edmail->wrapped->mail, field, reason); * ^* *edit-mail.c:* At top level:
2019 Feb 12
0
smtp_address_cmp does not ignore case of localpart
On 11/02/2019 22:43, Andreas Jobs via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > in src/lib-smtp/smtp-address.c line 759 the localpart is compared with > null_strcmp, which does not ignore the case. While this is the correct > behavior (according to the RFC) it causes problems in real life. > > In my case the vacation notices are not sent, if someone writes to > First.Last at
2015 Dec 22
0
FWD: Syslinux post from localpart@domain.tld requires approval
Hello, Usually is it easy to identify a valid non-subscriber-posting. Example given: the four postings about "bugzilla is back" in last day. Today there is a posting from the data plane development kit project, http://dpdk.org/ DPDK is a set of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing. Packets being network packets. That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this
2018 Nov 30
2
Request: Pigeonhole - strip CWFS from message-id logs
Normally for a log line containing the contents of a Message-Id, it is logged like the following Nov 29 11:41:27 xxx dovecot[211]: lmtp(lee)<30167><XXXXX>: sieve: msgid=<xxxx at example.net>: stored mail into mailbox 'Notifications' However, if there is CFWS other than a space, it changes the format of the log line (potentially making the logs harder to process - eg
2006 Nov 10
2
RFC 2822 - message-id
I was porting some email from one imap server location to another and ran into a feature of something. One of them writes message-id as 'Message-Id' and the other writes it as 'Message-ID'. Because of this, all the messages are forever different. All mail is delivered from postfix and will be in the future. But I'm asking which of these syntaxes is correct or if there is
2017 Jul 20
3
vacation problem with SRS
I have this version with FIXME /* FIXME: If From header of message has same address, we should use that * instead to properly include the phrase part. */ rfc2822_header_printf(msg, "To", "<%s>", reply_to); This should be work ok? Or You must change something? 2017-07-20 15:51 GMT+02:00 Stephan Bosch <stephan at
2015 Apr 07
2
Sieve, multiple addresses, and variables
Hi, I have another sieve question, this time about setting variables. I join a lot of mailing lists at ietf.org. I thought it'd be handy to filter these all into a common folder and then into individual folders, without having to configure each mailing list independently. So wrote this (this is just a part, obviously): require ["envelope", "variables",
2000 Aug 31
2
'ssh -f' option, interoperability with ssh v2.3.0
i'm trying to use the ssh command's -f option with OpenSSH v2.1.1p4 on linux (RedHat v6.2). this option doesn't seem to be working properly on my system - the specified is run succesfully but it isn't put to the background. is this a known problem? also, OpenSSH doesn't seem to interoperate with SSH Communications Security's ssh v2.3.0 (apparently because of different
2009 Jun 18
2
Asterisk on AVR32
Greetings everyone, I'm trying to compile asterisk for an AVR32 (Atmel NGW100). Buildroot for AVR32 already has the asterisk package, though it has bugs. Firstly it tries to apply a patch for 1.2 on a 1.6, but deleting the contents of the patch file did the trick. Now, the problem is making asterisk. The first error is because asterisk needed to be ./configure:ed. Trying to just do
2010 Mar 06
5
Quota plugin and SQL
I have read through http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict, which suggests a database schema for using quota. For 1.2, this includes a username, bytes and messages. Is there any way to modify the queries used to split out username into localpart and domain? This would enable me to put the current quota information in my main mailbox table and display it to users in my admin interface. Or
2019 Nov 16
2
Sieve and recipient_delimiter
I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several of them into a mailbox if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ ?FOO", ?foo", ?bar", ?florin"]) { fileinto :create ?later"; stop; } When I get an email addressed to me+FOO at example.com or me_florin at example.com, the messages end up in my inbox (Yes, I have both + and _
2019 Jan 25
2
Bug with latest GCC 9
Hi. As mentioned here: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123136 there's a new issue with GCC 9, it's related to: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/porting_to.html#complit in: /* Not const! Never return this as a result directly! */ #define SMTP_ADDRESS_LITERAL(localpart, domain) \ &((struct smtp_address){ (localpart), (domain) }) Thanks, Martin