similar to: Questions about SPECIAL-USE IMAP extension

Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at inf.h-brs.de> wrote: >> I'd like to configure my dovecot service to use the IMAP SPECIAL-USE > > well, in my experience SPECIAL-USE is just a suggestions to clients. Check > RFC 6154 for MUSTs, you'll find only few. Hence, how the client (or the > server) behaves in a special case is implementor-defined. In other words, expect the

On Mon Jan 15 2018 18:11:24 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> writes: > >>> Is this what you are looking for? >>> >>> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias >>> >>> It seems already be implemented... >> >> A first step maybe, but

> On September 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > >> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: > >>> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension

> On 28 Oct 2016, at 16.54, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/27/2016 8:36 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >>>> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the new server

> On 31 Oct 2016, at 13.11, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/30/2016 5:32 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 16.54, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> Oh... I thought the --useuid option eliminated this problem? >>> >>>

On 6/2/2016 3:50 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >> Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient >> delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... > > The reason this is important is simple. I've encountered a lot of sites > that

On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >>> On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >>>> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports

On Fri Jan 12 2018 01:29:37 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at inf.h-brs.de> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: >> I'd like to configure my dovecot service to use the IMAP SPECIAL-USE > well, in my experience SPECIAL-USE is just a suggestions to clients. Check > RFC 6154 for MUSTs, you'll find only few. Hence, how the client

On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IMAP? > > This is a problem with how you restored the files. > > On a linux system, you should use something like rsync -a to preserve > the original

Aki Tuomi writes: >>>>> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias > > There is also gotcha that MailboxAlias is not compatible with > mailbox_list_index=yes setting. Thanks. How does this manifests itself: the client gets an inconsistent view of the outgoing mailbox that depends on which mailbox the client is using, or the optimization is broken and dovecot keeps

On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl: >> One other point. >> >> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add >> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. >> >> Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to

On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 10/26/2016 2:38 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta > <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> This is much easier than dovecot replication as i can start immedialy with >> no need to upgrade the old server >> >> my only question is: how to manage the email received on the

On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: >> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >> >> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to >> how many emails dovecot can store in a single...

On Nov 22, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > I'm trying for the life of me to see a use case for anywhere close to > 1,000 folders, and am failing. That would be a major problem just from > the human side. How do you find anything? I can see it, though I think it?s excessive. List Mail Dovecot 2011-06 2011-07 2011-08 ?

> On December 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > > On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl > <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was, > > the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the > >

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird > > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. > > There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but >

One other point. Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used. Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to make this an SMTP service that any email client that supports SMTP can use? On 12/14/2017, 10:57:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 12/14/2017,

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > wrote: > > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > > would implement a new param for

On Wed Aug 23 2017 14:26:15 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Rupert Gallagher <ruga at protonmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > >> I would have to put in a plug for SOGo - very lightweight, ... > >> Care to elaborate? > >

Finally have some time to review list emails... On Tue Sep 04 2018 03:41:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > imapsync always loses data. Hi Sami, Can you expand on this? I used ImapSync to migrate from Dovecot to Office365 a couple of years ago, and didn't notice any issues with it at all.