similar to: Can Dovecot reject unencrypted mail?

Hi David, I don't know how to do what you want with dovecot, but what you are asking is easy and straightforward with Postfix. Postfix can easily be configured to feed mail through a milter ("mail filter") interface. You would just need to write a milter (there is a nice python library) that checks if the messages is "encrypted" to your specifications and tells Postfix

Hi, I am using dovecot 2.3.16, along with postfix and a PostgreSQL database for managing virtual accounts. I'd like to start using the mail-crypt plugin. However, I'm having a bit some difficulty understanding the documentation at https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_crypt_plugin to reach my goal. I plan to ask questions about those issues by starting new threads in this

> On 16/02/2023 07:18 EET mailinglist-subscriptions <mailinglist-subscriptions at protonmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am using dovecot 2.3.16, along with postfix and a PostgreSQL database for managing virtual accounts. > > I'd like to start using the mail-crypt plugin. However, I'm having a bit some difficulty understanding the documentation at >

On Tuesday, February 21st, 2023 at 09:54, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > On 16/02/2023 07:18 EET mailinglist-subscriptions mailinglist-subscriptions at protonmail.com wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using dovecot 2.3.16, along with postfix and a PostgreSQL database for managing virtual accounts. > > > > I'd like to

I would definitely get mail-crypt working on your system before worrying about encrypting existing emails. Iirc dovecot should support both types of files (encrypted, and non-encrypted) concurrently. So BEFORE you try anything, make sure via logs, etc that mail is being written to the fs as an encrypted file and that dovecot is able to decrypt it (i.e. you are able to view that particular

Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want to store it in a tar file type archive as when it needs to be accessed and have scripts executed/data generated, it needs to be untarred/unencrypted and I don't know the

I've got an application that I can run under wine. It uses SSL to communicate with a server. Since it's using SSL I can't just sniff the network packets. What would be the best way to have wine be able to dump the unencrypted data to a file for analysis? If this requires modifying code, which files should I look at? -- Anish Mistry amistry at am-productions.biz AM Productions

I?m using dovecot to provide encrypted IMAP e-mail support for remote clients and it?s working great. However, I also need to set up a webmail front-end (Roundcube), which I?m hoping to have use unencrypted IMAP on port 143 (as only port 993 is available externally). The problem I?m running into is that I want to require client certificate authentication on port 993, but dovecot is apparently

Hi, I don't think this is a remote desktop issue. I can run the following code by remoting into both a Windows 7 machine and a Windows Server R2 machine. I can see the results on the Windows 7 machine but not the server. > library(grid) > grid.raster(1:10/11) Best regards, Terry Terry Seaward Risk Manager T +27 21 416 1923 terry.seaward@investecmail.com 36 Hans Strijdom

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 21:55, Axel Luttgens <axel.luttgens at skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello Haravikk, > > Perhaps could you try to devise an exception based on one (or more) "remote" section(s), as in: > > remote ip.of.webmail.server { > ssl_verify_client_cert = no > [other settings, if needed] > } > > But I guess you would need to combine

On 02 Feb 2016, at 13:09, Haravikk <dovecot at haravikk.me> wrote: > > So I still haven?t found a way to require client certificates only for port 993/IMAPS while leaving unencrypted IMAP open for local, trusted, services. > > Is there really no way to do this? I just found out how to do the same thing for postfix (turns out it?s fairly easy, just a matter of adding the

Hi, Is there a way to make windows2000, xp and 2003 work with unencrypted passwords as a domain member in a domain with a Samba Server as PDC? Igor -- "F?r mich sitzen in deutschen Talkshows viel zu viele Leute mit einem Monatseinkommen von 20 000 Euro herum, die denen mit 2000 sagen, sie m?ssten den G?rtel enger schnallen" - Harald Schmidt

Hi, everyone, I'm surprised how little exists on the Internet regarding this particular subject. Given the recent headlines, that is about to change, I'm sure. I have a need to send an automated response to all senders who attempt to send unencrypted and/or unsigned email to a specific mailbox on my system. (Messages originating from localhost should be exempt.) I would like for the

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hello, I'd be very grateful if anyone could share their ideas on this problem. The situation is this: I have a Solaris 8 machine running Samba 2.2.1a. The global configuration has "security = USER" and originally had "encrypt passwords = NO". I was able to map drives to shares on this machine from my WinNT 4 SP 5 workstation when I set the registry key advised by the

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was wondering if I could ask this question here. > > Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block > encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I > found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a >

Hi, My company have been using rsync to sync our file to a backup server (running rsync daemon), and now we would like to store them encrypted. I found some thread that discussed this issue but they are pretty old (about 10 years ago). So I send this question again and looking for any new approach. Is there any option or module for rsync to encrypt file on the destination? Thanks a lot, Dat Le

Dear It is possible to configure Samba 4.4.5 to accept queries that do not use TLS? I'm having trouble authenticating the Proxy / SquidGuard in AD Samba 4.4.5. I get this error: (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed: Strong(er) authentication required I read the wiki Samba, the new versions are working with authentication TLS encrypted connections. It is possible to configure Samba

rje writes: > I'm looking into ways to encrypt the stored email on my server. The idea is > to make it impossible for my hosting provider (who has access to my VPS) to > read the mail from the disk. Just to be clear, if at any point your VPS has access to the plaintext mail (or keys that decrypt mail), then the VPS provider could access your decrypted mail. To make it unfeasible

I don't see a way to do this currently (unless I am missing something) but I would like to be able to specify, that in order for a user to login, they need to use at least 1 public key from 2 separate key sources.? Specifically this would be when using "AuthenticationMethods publickey,publickey".? Right now requiring 2 public keys for authentication will allow 2 public keys from