similar to: Sieve with LDA

> On 17 December 2017, at 02:42, Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:17:39 -0800, Doug Hardie stated: > >> I found an email that sieve stored in Deleted Messages incorrectly. The log >> messages show sieve doing that, but don't give me any indication of which >> sieve rule caused the problem. I went through it manually, but

I have tried to do something like if body :content ["multipart"] :matches ["Original-Message-ID" ?*?] { set "Original_Message_ID" "${0}"; } but instead getting Original Message ID I?m getting value from previous match which was if envelope :matches "From" "*" { set "sender" "${0}"; } Is there any example of working

It also got the bulletin out to new users without admin intervention. Sent from Mobile ________________________________ From: Doug Hardie<mailto:bc979 at lafn.org> Sent: ?2/?22/?2016 4:02 To: Dovecot Mailing List<mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>; Timo Sirainen<mailto:tss at iki.fi> Cc: Kevin Kershner<mailto:cstkersh at outlook.com> Subject: Re: Dovecot Bulletin > On 20

Op 12/17/2017 om 12:22 PM schreef Doug Hardie: >> On 17 December 2017, at 02:42, Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:17:39 -0800, Doug Hardie stated: >> >>> I found an email that sieve stored in Deleted Messages incorrectly. The log >>> messages show sieve doing that, but don't give me any indication of which

I am running a small server with a fixed number of users. Postfix is using dovecot lda so that I can run pigeonhole. I have setup a user file with the ids and passwords and everything authenticates properly. Postfix uses that also. However, mail is consistently delivered to user at domain. How do I tell it to deliver to just user? I have tried setting a variety of different things like:

Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the following interface: msk0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c011b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03 inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:17:39 -0800, Doug Hardie stated: >I found an email that sieve stored in Deleted Messages incorrectly. The log >messages show sieve doing that, but don't give me any indication of which >sieve rule caused the problem. I went through it manually, but didn't see >anything that matched. I seem to recall that there was a way to use >sieve-test to show

I have been updating my FreeBSD systems for many years by updating and building from source. For the FreeBSD 9.2 cycle, I decided to use freebsd-update for binary update instead. I use Sendmail + Cyrus-SASL and the freebsd-update process only installed a 'bare bones' binary. How do I compile just Sendmail from source so that it uses my /etc/make.conf for the smtp_auth components?

I have a pigeon sive running which directs some of my received mail to the Junk folder. That works just fine. However, a couple minutes later, it is moved to Deleted mailbox and deleted from Junk. At first I thought my client was doing that so I shut down the client and it still happens. Here are the log entries: Jul 2 00:36:31 mail dovecot: imap(doug): copy from INBOX: box=Junk, uid=10842,

Hello everyone. I'm running dovecot (1.2.9) with postfix (2.7.0) on an ubuntu 10.04.1. I'm hosting mail for several domains and using the dovecot local delivery agent. Everything has been working great. However, today I set up a sieve script to send out-of-office replies (vacation) for one of our users. I tested it and got the response just fine. However, when looking at the

I am not sure if this is possible. When I use "vacation" in a sieve script, it always sends the response using "<>". I need it to send the response using a specific address. Is this possible? Thanks :) -- Jerry

> On 10 August 2017, at 04:37, Alef Veld <alefveld at outlook.com> wrote: > > I completely agree (having said that I'm pretty new to all this so I might be full of it). > > You should run your own CA if you have an active financial interest in your company (say your the owner). No added benefit to have your certificate certified by a third party, why would they care

I know that this is technically not a Dovecot problem; however, I was wondering if anyone knew if 'sieve' had been updated with the ability to 'forward as attachment' a received document. I believe it has the ability to forward a document; however, I need the ability to forward it as an attachment if possible. Also I believe, somewhat due to my asking for them, that sieve exits

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:08:20 -0400, David Mehler stated: >Can you send a complete doveconf -n and your dovecot startup lines in >/etc/rc.conf? /etc/rc.conf ## Dovecot dovecot_enable="YES" # 2.3.1 (8e2f634): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.1 (d9bc6dfe) # OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p9 amd64 zfs # Hostname: localhost auth_mechanisms = plain login

I am not even sure if this is possible. I cannot find an example of it anywhere. I am in the process of setting up a "plus" addressing system. The addresses would be addresses to accounts like <sales+USERNAME at domain.com>. there are presently 50 such names in sales. This is the one line entry I presently have in the sieve script: if envelope :detail "To"

FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p9 amd64 doveconf # 2.3.1 (8e2f634): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.1 (d9bc6dfe) # OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p9 amd64 zfs # Hostname: localhost I can send the entire output if necessary. Error message upon boot up: doveconf: error: t_readlink(/var/run/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: readlink() failed: No such file or directory Starting dovecot.

Some time ago there was an announcement that people should not use 5.0 for critical production systems. Now that 5.1 is available, what is the consesous on it? Should it be used for critical production systems yet?

Hi I have a simple sieve script to discard email with a certain string in the subject. I now need to beef this up a bit with the following: if header :contains "subject" "A" and "B" and not "C" discard if header :contains "subject" "A" and "D" and not "C" discard else pass Maybe my google skills are failing but

Assume and e-mail address of: me+dovecot at domain.com I have a sieve script that sorts mail into the appropriate folders using "+" addressing. I want to extend it to also work with mailing list like this one. A post from the dovecot forum arrives with a Delivered-To: me+dovecot at domain.com when I receive it. The "To" is to dovecot. I cannot figure out a way to get sieve to

Sieve plugin does not autocreate folder, defined in sieve filter /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve require ["fileinto"]; # rule:[off] if anyof (header :contains "To" "off@***.com", header :contains "Cc" "off@****.com") { fileinto "INBOX.off"; stop; } >sievec /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve sievec(root): Debug: Loading modules