similar to: sieve filter move wrong email to Junk folder

> Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 09:47:44 -0800 > From: Gao <gao at pztop.com> > > I use a sieve filter to move spam email to user's Junk folder: ># cat spam_to_junk.sieve > require "fileinto"; > ? if exists "X-Spam-Status" { > ????????? if header :contains "X-Spam-Status" "YES" { > ????????? fileinto

Well I changed the line to ????????? if header :contains "X-Spam-Status: YES" { Then I got: # sievec spam_to_junk.sieve spam_to_junk: line 3: error: the header test requires 2 positional argument(s), but 1 is/are specified. spam_to_junk: error: validation failed. sievec(root): Fatal: failed to compile sieve script 'spam_to_junk.sieve' Should it be: ????????? if header

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

This is what I use.? Notice the comma: require "fileinto"; if header :contains "X-Spam-Status" "Yes," { ? fileinto "SystemFolders.SuspectedSpam"; ? stop; } Bill On 12/14/2017 1:02 PM, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 09:47:44 -0800 >> From: Gao <gao at pztop.com> >> >> I use a sieve filter to move

--[This is an automatically generated email notification.]-- ************************************************************ M A I L W A T C H V I R U S A L E R T ! ************************************************************ You recently sent a message containing a known virus - W32/Sobig.f@MM (ED). The message was sent on 8/20/2003 11:39:38 PM. The subject of the message was: Your

On 12/18/18 3:34 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 18/12/2018 08:08, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and >> Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and >> Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and >> it looks like there are no false positives, e. g.

Am 09.02.19 um 19:56 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > I'll review the settings when we manage to upgrade to mailman3 Hello Aki, before updating to mailman3 consider an simpler update to latest mailman2. you're using 2.1.15, current mailman2 is 2.1.29 Your missing an /significant amount/ of DMARC fixes! and: more off-topic: while my messages *to* the dovecot list are sent using

On 18/12/2018 08:08, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and > Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and > Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and > it looks like there are no false positives, e. g. valid mail is never > identified as spam. > > When a message is

Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas where i can get their rpms? regards, marco.

Hi All ;) Currently I am gathering info about possible components for a mailserver. I think that MailScanner/Baruwa/postfix will be a good choice. I set up a similar system (with MailWatch instead of Baruwa) about 3 years ago and had very good experience ;) What do you think about MailScanner/Baruwa now? Do you maybe use any good alternatives and can recommend them? Thanks for all help ;) Best

hey friends, I am running my company's mail server on FC3 which comprises of Postfix + Dovecot + MailScanner + Clamav + Squirrelmail + MailWatch + Spamassassin. I am using Dovecot 0.99.13-3 version on FC3 and I want to implement Quota limits for the users. I am using userdatabase as /etc/passwd file (auth_userdb = passwd ) and password database as pam(auth_passdb = pam) for dovecot. I read

> On December 29, 2017 at 2:56 AM Gao <gao at pztop.com> wrote: > > > On 2017-12-27 07:00, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > Dovecot now has package repository for Debian, CentOS and Ubuntu > > available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ > > > > Packages are provided for 2.3 series and forward. Please let us know > > if you run into any trouble with

Dear All, I have recently upgraded mu centos 5 final to centos 5.3 using yum update i have the following setup which was running on centos 5 old server is centos os 5 now centos 3 with all the utilitlies Mailscanner 4.6 clam av 0.92 + spam assassin 3.1 mailwatch 1.04 after running yum server upgraded to centos 5.3 and download and installed latest mail scanner and clamav+ spam assassin centos

Dear All, I am sorry for the post here but really apprecite if someone could help me or advise. actually i just could not subscribe to sendmail mailing list I have the following setup for a long time on a single computer Centos server running as my primary Mail & Dns server CentOS release 5 (Final) sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 bind-9.3.4-6.0.3.P1.el5_2 MailScanner (4.76.25) Mailwatch 1.0.4 I had

I've got a Cento 6.2 server I'm putting together that will become a mailserver. It will have on it MailScanner and MailWatch for MailScanner. I'm using the latest stuff available and have run into a problem with changes I need to make in the /etc/sudoers file. It doesn't seem to take affect after I make the changes, so either the syntax within the file has changed or the way

Dear ALl, I have the following live setup . Centos 5.1 running as a Mail and DNS server with the following software Sendmail ver MailScanner ver squirrel mail clam av spamassassin mailwatch we have about 250 mail users all with no shell and every thing is working perfectly fine now i wd like to know the following . 1) if i have a copy of my /etc/passwd file and the /etc/skel/shadow file and

Hi, we run an "old" mailserver system which was set up a couple of years ago. The systme dose "everything" what we need(ed). Over the last days I noticed an unnormal increase of the system load up to 10 and lots of users told me that there mailclient connections (sending and receiving) are dropped from time to time. I was planing to exchange the server respectively distribut

I've actually been thinking about it almost since the beginning. It's just been annoying waste of space on my screen. And more importantly nowadays it's also breaking DKIM/DMARC signatures. So if somebody still uses Subject-based filtering it's about time to switch to List-ID header based filtering now. Another thing I'm wondering about is if I should allow text/html parts,

Dear All, I have managed perfectly fine to install centos 5.5 x64 on a new sun blade x6270 server module .i had to install in text mode since GUI install mode was not working Actually this machine is going to replace my current working very low hardware server the server is used as my primary dns, mail server , webmail server also running Mailscanner, mailwatch etc. Also I want to use

Robert's suggestion indeed fixed the problem. I kept thinking those entries were necessary in inetd.conf. Also, kind thanks to Fred Gilbert for his prompt responses.:-) John