similar to: recover missing messages - files still present in storage

Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? Aki > On December 7, 2017 at 7:00 PM Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're > missing. > Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. > > I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage

On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > > Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? > > Same (wrong) result: > 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body > > 2. Search against "too6Ouka": > # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body too6Ouka

On 24/05/2018 15:33, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 21 May 2018, at 14.11, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: >> >> Le 21/05/2018 ? 12:38, Aki Tuomi a ?crit : >>> can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? >> >> Same (wrong) result: >> 1. Send an email with "too6Ouka" in the body >> >> 2. Search against

Hello, I have been using flags in public folders for quite a while with no problems. Once the flags were added to all clients (Thunderbird), they were visible and synchronized properly. Now I have added some new flags, and in the dovecot-keywords files I see that I am now using more than 25 flags (in which case they are not stored using an additional letter in the filename). Now I see that

Hi. Dovecot 2.2, with the zlib plugin, I think we're getting bad index entries on IMAP COPY. On copying a message to an empty folder, in the dovecot error log I see: Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (615 < 971) Sep 19 20:34:25 imap01 dovecot: imap(grain at rp-auth-test.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file

(NOTE: I am not on the mailing list so please Cc: me.) dovecot-1.1.6-2.fc10.i386 (configuration not changed from stock) Fedora 10 AMD Athlon XP ext3 Maildir format doesn't store keywords in the index properly -- it goes up to 26 and then further keywords are dropped. I ran the tests with a simple script that feeds the lines from "commands" to Dovecot one at a time and waits for

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? > > Hello Aki, yes I did that, but I didn't remove the map files first (I don't know if that's required). I can do it again if needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil*

Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? > I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. > >

Hi, did you check in unstable ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot 2018-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com>: > hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a > stretch-backport repos, right? > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK -

Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing? I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos. The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get install it. I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I

Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in Debian Jessie If I follow this guide <https://repo.dovecot.org/>, it ends up installing 2.3 If I follow this guide <https://wiki.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#preview>, it ends up installing either 2.2.13 if I use "stable" or 2.2.36 alpha if I use "jessie" I see that 2.2.35 seems to be

Playing with the new idxview I got this error running against my INBOX dovecot.index.cache file. What exactly does it mean? Full output: # /usr/libexec/dovecot/idxview dovecot.index.cache -- INDEX: dovecot.index.cache version = 1.8 base header size = 0 header size = 1170103198 record size = 1170103283 compat flags = 7 index id = 0 flags = 26512 uid validity = 0 next uid = 2460778624 messages

Hi Konstantin, There is no sieve for the user (checked his dovecot mail directory, sieve folder is empty and there is no sieve file) and the only global sieve present is regarding the X-Spam-Flag header, which is not the case. There is no login happening for this user and this occur, for sure. The only thing I can imagine is some e-mail client as you said is holding an old connection open,

Hello, The following errors are constantly popping up for 2 accounts. I can't get it fixed, I did doveadm backup to another account, the same happens in the new account. I did doveadm force-resync, the problem persists. I'm using dovecot 2.2. 2017-08-18T11:46:12.472821881Z Aug 18 11:46:12 lmtp(ramon.lacerda at alliar.com): Warning: mdbox

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate their > local caches and > redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies. > > Sami > > I don't think so. Been using imapsync for large scale migrations from external servers to our dovecot setup. Users

Hi, A couple of months ago I had a problem with Single Attachment Storage after infrastructure migration; All mailboxes were rsynced to another filesystem, and that may have broken Single Attachment Storage. Many, many (if not all) mailboxes show the below logs on dovecot: imap(foo at bar.com): Error: read(attachments-connector(zlib(/dovecotdir/mail/

Hi, often I run into the situation where a dovecot server goes down for maintenance, and all users get concentrated in the remaining dovecot server (considering I have 2 dovecot servers only). When that dovecot server comes back online, director server will send new users to it, but the dovecot server that was up all the time will still have tons of clients mapped to it. I suggest the director

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hi, is there any dovecot rule settings besides X-Spam-Flag header? Can it move messages via IMAP? I have a message that is being moved to spam folder after delivered in the INBOX but it has no X-Spam-Flag and it's not beeing done by the user (I changed his password, suspended his account and made his login impossible). This happens only when certain "FROM" address is present in

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > This is fixed in next release (2.2.32) with > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c8be394 > > Aki Tuomi > As this is still a release candidate, I'm thinking of running an isolated instance of this version, and do doveadm force-resync just to fix just this user's mailbox. What do you