similar to: macros in config support

Hi, I'm always working on my Samba server, and put the log level to 10 like Volker said in a previous message. But, when i read any log files i see a troubling message : "got a SHUTDOWN message" Every minutes !!! Is this behavior normal ?? Following, the paste of 2 sequences (so 2 minutes of a log file) : [2009/10/04 23:09:45, 10] lib/events.c:105(run_events) Running timed

If ‘virt-v2v -oo insecure’ is used then ‘openstack --insecure’ flag is added whenever we invoke the openstack command. This turns of SSL certificate validation. --- v2v/output_openstack.ml | 14 +++++++++++++- v2v/virt-v2v-output-openstack.pod | 1 + v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/v2v/output_openstack.ml

If ‘virt-v2v -oo verify-server-certificate=false’ is used then ‘openstack --insecure’ flag is added whenever we invoke the openstack command. This turns off SSL certificate validation. The default is to verify the server certificate (which is the default of the openstack command). --- v2v/output_openstack.ml | 16 +++++++++++++++- v2v/test-v2v-o-openstack.sh | 2 ++

Shouldn''t update_all be updating lock_version? As you can see from my console session below, it is upating the record (changed running attribute to true and returned 1 to show 1 recored was updated). But it did not increment lock_version. And optimistic locking is working correctly otherwise. As you can see below, lock version = 562 before and after the update_all call but it is

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > Hi, Hi Fabien, sorry I didn't respond to this earlier as I was doing some work. If you CC me on emails then you can usually get a quicker response. > I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code to understand how it works and > I've seen this: > > > (* The server name or UUID of the conversion

On my current instance, the meta_data.json is the following: { "availability_zone": "nova", "devices": [], "hostname": "ims-host-1", "keys": [ { "data": "ssh-rsa

Hello, I have a server running samba version 4.7.1 on centos 7.5 1) A series of operations by a windows 10 (up to date) pc client consisting of  searching (or browsing)/opening/modifying/closing a (each time different) file multiple times on a samba share containing many files (more than 11000) goes fast for a while. 2) Then the same operation (or just the searching or opening) of the same user

Hi, I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code to understand how it works and I've seen this: > (* The server name or UUID of the conversion appliance where > * virt-v2v is currently running. In future we may be able > * to make this optional and derive it from the OpenStack > * metadata service instead. > *) > server_id : string; Indeed, it can be

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Fabien, sorry I didn't respond to this earlier as I was doing some > work. If you CC me on emails then you can usually get a quicker > response. > > > I've read the virt-v2v OpenStack output code

On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and > 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory > Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, > Selinux, a firewall etc). Is Samba actually running ? Are you using > Bind9, if so, is it running and set

On 25/07/2019 17:52, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: > On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and >> 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory >> Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, >> Selinux, a firewall etc). Is

Hi! I upgrade for Samba 4 8.2 my 3 DCs(no ore erro, and replication is ok with kcc), but msg about Squid with NTLM persist, and dont work more... May 18 11:50:43 DC3 samba: conn[named_pipe] c[unix:] s[unix:/opt/samba/var/run/ncalrpc/np/netlogon] server_id[2157][2157]:   schannel_check_required: [LOJA09A] is not using schannel Any ideia ? Regards; On 18-05-2018 12:24, Carlos wrote: >

Marco Gaiarin via samba ha scritto il 25/08/20 alle 18:53: > [...] >> The only other thing I can think of at the moment is to remove >> 'winbind use default domain = yes' > > It was a try, i think in NT mode don't bother at all. on my samba server with 'winbind use default domain" set to yes dominioNT\ is removed from users and groups names... >

On 22/03/16 05:24, Juan Garcia wrote: > Hi There, > > I have an odd issue with my samba4 infrastructure, I have two servers > both replicating fine. > DC1 passes all tests documented here: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > Except the following test: > > # kinit administrator > # kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client

Our samba server in ap-east-1 is running very slow today I noticed three things in log.smb, and I don't understand any of them ---------- #1 roughly every 80 seconds what appears to be a reconnect loop [2020/11/19 17:35:46.283315, 2] ../../source3/lib/tallocmsg.c:87(register_msg_pool_usage) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2020/11/19 17:35:46.287132, 1]

Hi, I have an issues that involves KDC, it is quite complex so I'll try to be really specific. I was running Samba42 with a secondary server replicating all was working fine. After we upgrade to Samba43 we start with the issues: 1. Replication wasn't working anymore error (WERR_LOGON_FAILURE) 2. Kerberos is also broken. On the Primary DC wouldn't allow me to to a kinit

Hi, On 10/16/20 5:48 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > What I asked them for, and (because we have worked together before) I'm > confident you can get is, correlated by a high-resolution timestamp: I hope someone here can help me a little bit, doing the above. I have a level 10 log from the samba DC, however, it shows nothing like "GetNCChanges" anywhere. It does however show

Hi, can't seem to login to Samba Server using notebook. OS is FreeBSD 10.3. Samba Version is 4.6.6 Connect to the remote Samba server using L2TP/IPSec connection. When trying to login it's not accepting the correct credentials. When ssh'ing to the server can login without any issue: # smbclient -Uusername //server/share Enter SERVERNAME\username's password: Domain=[DOMAINNAME]

Hi, Try to add "rdns = false" in krb5.conf on SERVER1. 2016-06-21 13:36 GMT+02:00 Juan Garcia <juan at ish.com.au>: > Hi There, > > I have an odd issue with my samba4 infrastructure, I have two servers both > replicating fine. > DC1 passes all tests documented here: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > Except

Hi Louis, Hi Rowland, I will respond to both in this mail. Yes winbind is installed : [root at dmzrodc ~]# which winbindd /usr/sbin/winbindd [root at dmzrodc ~]# rpm -qa |grep winbind sernet-samba-winbind-4.8.2-10.el7.x86_64 I know about *mbd processes. so strange.. This is why I'm posting here :-) I joined the RODC following the procedure available on the wiki page