similar to: user selection for replication

Quoting Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: >> On 11 Jul 2016, at 17:36, Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: >> >> Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: >> >>> You are not alone! >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >>>> Dear list, >>>>

Maybe you could not delete the message instantly, but keep track of last seen UID. UIDs increase monotonically, so you can rest assured that next arriving email has larger UID. Then you can bulk delete mails that are older than one day. Aki > On October 20, 2017 at 8:01 PM Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Anyone has suggestions? The situation

Hi, Anyone has suggestions? The situation also happends when I ?delete? a message from my Phone. It seems to get replicated instantly and the just deleted email is back in the mailbox again. I did remove HA Proxy support in the meantime to rule that out and I have enabled the default replication_max_conns. thanks Remko > On 13 Oct 2017, at 11:56, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org>

> On 7 Jun 2018, at 07:21, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > > Still not quite right for me. > > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during

Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: > You are not alone! > > On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send >> email >> over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin >> way of sending

Am 2018-06-07 07:34, schrieb Remko Lodder: > On 7 Jun 2018, at 07:21, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> > wrote: >> Still not quite right for me. >> >> Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: >> dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 >> seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) >>

Still not quite right for me. Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during state=sync_mails (send=mails recv=recv_last_common) I'm not sure if there is an underlying replication error

On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >> >> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication without those issues reported in this thread? >> #) do you get

Aaaaand I forgot to CC the list, sorry for that, it's way too early in the morning :P On 07.06.18 - 07:39, Thore B?decker wrote: > What does the output of these two commands show after that error has > been logged? > > doveadm replicator status > > doveadm replicator dsync-status > > If there are *waiting failed* requests, that never make it "through" >

Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other

Hi People, I recently setup a replication service within dovecot between two machines in different datacenters, which has the following configuration; (yes it is hashed out, because I needed to) #service replicator { # unix_listener replicator-doveadm { # mode = 0666 # } # process_min_avail = 1 #} # #service aggregator { # fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo { # mode = 0666 #

Dear Dovecot and community, We run a small email service for our customers, based on two machines that are made ?redundant or clustered? by using the replication feature of Dovecot. This works well, for most emails. Sometimes the following happends: Email to our support database arrives at the inbox. Every period a cronjob looks into that mailbox and parses the information and makes a support

On 1/06/2018 2:47 AM, Michael Grimm wrote: > On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >>> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >>> >>> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

Yeah but if you are uncertain about your own box my VERY STRONG advise is that you reinstall. IF your host is indeed owned, then you are a lot further away then just reinstalling, god knows what issues can arrise when a cracker exploits the system to do bogus tasks.. Then i say: Too bad for your time, sorry but it's like that -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:10, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> wrote: > > Does the Dovecot NTLM mechanism work with MS Outlook? > > [ ] YES > [ ] NO > > Please check one ... anybody. > > ?Mark The URL on the wiki, which had probably been shared before with you; http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm suggests it does. The URL quotes: Step 5.

forgot this addr. -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Remko Lodder [mailto:remko@elvandar.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 23 januari 2004 10:53 Aan: Nick Twaddell Onderwerp: RE: [Freebsd-security] ipfw + named problem did you tcpdump the packets so that you can

...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015" http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ ============================================================================ samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 <http://www.freshports.org/net/>net<http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount> <http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_all&method=match&query=net/samba3>=220 FORBIDDEN:

Hello Remko: sorry to bother you again,after e mailing freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org mailing list, got a reply by the list moderator rejecting my message,stating that there is no valid message from that address,sugesting yet another email address, it doubts the authenticity of your recomendation Remko, you sugested I should look into securing my emailserver installation by preventing unauthorized

Am 2018-06-07 08:48, schrieb Remko Lodder: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 08:04:49AM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Conclusion: After 12 hours of running a patched FBSD port I do get >> those >> error messages but replictaion seems to work now. But, I still have >> the >> feeling that there might something else going wrong. > > I agree with that. Are you using