similar to: LDAP Filters as defined for dovecot UserDB and passDB

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Check your userdb, is it using same config file? some HOWTOs explicitly want you to use two config files, because Dovecot maintains two different connections for passdb and userdb queries, which is faster. So if you have copied the config file, instead of symlinked them, you might have to change two

Check your userdb, is it using same config file? Aki On 02.11.2017 23:59, Will Merkens wrote: > I have pretty much everything working fine. > > I have run into one issue with the filters that I am unsure where this a filter is being set. > > Dovecot 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4) > > I have setup dovecot-ldap.conf.ext to control my LDAP query's > > My current layout used

System basics ??? Centos 7.3 ??? Dovecot 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4) I am working on a replacement mail server for work and one of the features I wanted was ldap authentication After much fiddling I got it to work. But I encountered a issue where two different methods of testing a mail account resulted in the mail_location being different I set? mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/maildir/%d/%n/Maildir

We recently began seeing server crashes in our cluster related to "pop3-login", which is causing "oom-killer" to be invoked. The server only recovers after a reboot. From dovecot.conf: login_process_per_connection = yes login_processes_count = 16 login_max_processes_count = 256 (Should we try switching processes_per_connection to no?) From dovecot.log: dovecot: Apr 17

Guys, I'm running out of hair to pull out ;). Can anyone out there say that this does work?? To me this is looking like a bug and I'm not sure whether it's the sieve plugin or the dovecot deliver program. I have also had no luck the the "reject" sending any reply back to the sender. My setup: OS: Solaris 10 sparc platform postfix: 2.5.2 dovecot: 1.1.2 sieve plugin: 1.1.5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry to bring this up again. I have now configured my test server to pass all email messages off to our central campus email filter gateway. This gateway scans all email traffic for viruses/spam before being delivered to any local mail servers. Once I did this my auto vacation replies are getting canned due to the fact the from header line is empty

We are using dbox with lz4 compression and dovecot-lda + sieve for delivery. Mail recieved: Mar 16 06:27:55 mail2 dovecot: lda(svs at example.com): sieve: msgid=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4 at rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' Around 08:14:00 user start his thunderbird with local filters. He found one mail without headers. Around that time user do

Hi, I can't login in the IMAP server. This is the log from a telnet session to port 143: Feb 16 15:38:32 mail2 dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP secured lip=192.168.84.128 rip=192.168.84.128 resp=<hidden> Feb 16 15:38:32 mail2 dovecot: auth(default): checkpassword(gamito at mail2.telbit.pt,192.168.84.128): Executed: /usr/local/bin/auth_imap

Hello, I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail replication is working fine. Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created: Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login: user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186, lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666> Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot:

Hello, I have two systems one with dovecot 2.2.31/Pigeonhole 0.4.19 selfcompiled through the src.rpms from ghettoforge on a CentOS 6.9 server and a second system of SOGo (3.2.9, nightly) on CentOS 7. Everything worked together until I made the update to Dovecot 2.2.31 Pigeonhole 0.4.19. Since then I get an error message when I try to upload a sieve-script. SOGo shows a message popup that

Hi Everybody, I'm mount two failover servers which use Postfix and Dovecot but the hostname of the machines r diferent: first node # uname -n # mail secound node #uname -n #mail2 So far so good, the real problem is that the e-mail file name on server is like this: 1232449377.P31789Q0M963611.mail2 and when I using the server called mail the file stay like this:

Our setup is ok with Postfix / Dovecot. I just need to add dovecot LDA. I use the 1.0beta9 LDA Configuration: protocol lda { postmaster_address = postmaster@clm.net4all.ch #hostname = #mail_plugins = #mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/imap #sendmail_path = /usr/lib/sendmail auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master } auth default-socket { mechanisms = plain login passdb

Hi, Whitbox Linux 3 (RHEL) Dovecot 1.0.rc29 Using NFS From time to time does all mail get re-downloaded to Thunderbird. I would believe this has something to do with an index problem. I upgraded to 1.0 a few months ago but that didn't work well so I installed version 1.0.rc29 which worked better but we still get this problem from time to time. DOes anyone know if it is a good idea to

Hello, I am using Dovecot version 2.2.10. I am quite familiar with ssh replication and I managed to set it up correctly. The only problem I see is that when i run the command: doveadm replicator status I get a wrong "Total number of known users" which is a) is different between the two (2) replicated dovecot servers, i.e. in mail1 I get a total of 21 users and in mail2 I get a total of

Hi there! I have two DNS records mail1.domain.tld mail2.domain.tld I have issued SSL server Certificates for both my domain names. Is it possible to tell dovecot to use both , depending on client access; clients using the mail1.domain.tld be served by the mail1.domain.tld .key and .cert and those using mail2.domain.tld be served by the mail2.domain.tld .key and .cert Thanks in advance

I have a xen system with four guest OS's, (see list below). When I reboot the host, other guests autostart normally, but mail2 does not. I have found no explanation for this. The host and all guests are CentOS 5.5. [root at farm1 xen]# ls -l /etc/xen/auto total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Dec 11 2009 dawit -> ../dawit lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 May 5 21:10 mail2 -> ../mail2 lrwxrwxrwx

Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com>?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > > mail1/mail2 is for

Dear All, I was wondering if this is possible: I am using namespaces to support my environment which has legacy mboxes and new maildirs. In it looks like: namespace private { separator = / inbox = yes prefix = location = maildir:/home/virtual/%d/home/%n/Maildir/ } namespace private { separator = / prefix = mail2/ inbox = yes hidden = yes location =

Hi all, We need to set our filestore to read-only for quite a while, and I want to mitigate the effects for our clients. First issue; dovecot. If we just change the nfs mounts to read-only, dovecot complains: 2009-02-19T14:03:19+00:00 mail2 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<test2 at markandruth.co.uk>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.15.10.95, lip=10.15.10.102:11002 2009-02-19T14:03:19+00:00 mail2

Hi, I run dovecot version 2.1.7 and postfix 2.9.6. I'm using dovecot-lda as local delivery. I use virtual users and need to use catch-all for some of my domains. My problem when using catch-all is that I got a separate email for each recipient. As an example: If I send mail to: test1 at test.org, test2, test3 at test.org, test4 at test.org and have a catch-all which will send this mail to