similar to: All over sudden dovecot thinks FS is read only

> On October 28, 2017 at 1:41 PM Tobi <tobster at brain-force.ch> wrote: > > > Hello list > > I saw the response from Vlad in my queue (as dovecot was broken there > has been no delivery to mailbox) but after fix and queue flush Vlads > message does not show up in my mailbox. > > > Check the systemd unit for ProtectHome, and make sure that is turned >

Hello list I saw the response from Vlad in my queue (as dovecot was broken there has been no delivery to mailbox) but after fix and queue flush Vlads message does not show up in my mailbox. > Check the systemd unit for ProtectHome, and make sure that is turned > off. Found these lines in unit file > # Enable this if your systemd is new enough to support it: > ProtectSystem=full

Hi Stephan yes the imap_sieve plugin is added to the mail_plugins for imap. Thanks for the hint with mail_debug. After enabling it I can see that the program seems to be called, so filter should not be the problem. But the result is that the message appears unencrypted in my sent folder > Apr 6 08:20:26 mbox2 dovecot: imap(tobster at brain-force.ch): Debug: imapsieve: mailbox Sent: APPEND

Op 25-4-2016 om 18:01 schreef Timo Sirainen: > On 25 Apr 2016, at 13:48, Tobi <tobster at brain-force.ch> wrote: >> Hi list >> >> I just realized that that I don not receive all mails in my mailbox >> (running dovecot-ee 2.2.23.1-1 on Debian 8). On my frontend servers >> (running postfix) the queue fills up with mails that cannot be delivered >> via

Hi list I just realized that that I don not receive all mails in my mailbox (running dovecot-ee 2.2.23.1-1 on Debian 8). On my frontend servers (running postfix) the queue fills up with mails that cannot be delivered via lmtp to my backend servers. The error message on the frontend is "lost connection with backend while sending data" When I checked the logs on the backend server I found

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:17:21AM -0800, Glenn E. Bailey III wrote: > This is a base install. If you deploy an instance in ec2 or GCE (ec2 > you can do the free tier) it's easily repeatable. Even on a RHEL 7.3 > instance. Note you'll need to allow root and password logins via SSH > before attempting. I can confirm this. The culprit? NetworkManager has /home open. I

Hello list I currently have an issue with an imapsieve script on my dovecot server CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) Dovecot 2.2.26.0 (23d1de6) Pigeonhole 2.2.26.0 The goal is to "fire" an imapsieve script upon mailclient saves message to sent folder I setup the following in 90-plugin.conf: plugin { sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve sieve_extprograms sieve_extensions =

Am 19.03.2020 um 16:28 schrieb Adam Raszkiewicz: > I was able to solve errors below but now it complains about the startup how is handled on Centos7: > > ? dovecot.service - LSB: Dovecot init script > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/dovecot; bad; vendor preset: disabled) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-03-19 15:15:37 UTC; 54s ago > Docs:

Hi Stephan currently the rpm is built based on 0.4.14 Should I try with 0.4.16? I will build it again this afternoon with the version you suggested and report back with the results. Thanks for the help here tobi ----- Originale Nachricht ----- Von: Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> Gesendet: 08.01.17 - 11:00 An: tobster at brain-force.ch@pgp.brain-force.ch, Dovecot Mailing List

The main reason is that I don't want to provide backup user with unnecessary write permissions within maildirs and mail user within backup logs dir. I was talking about mail_user:mail_group 0750 on dirs and 0640 on files. (Or, possibly, mail_user:backup_group 2750 and 2640.) 26.12.2014, 11:19, "Tobi" <tobster at brain-force.ch>: > Whats the reason you do not want to use

Hi, Is it possible to have dovecot configured to use mbox format and yet have folders that contains sub-folders and messages? I'm thinking of a simple setup where any files directory with extension .sbd are presented to the IMAP client without the extension. So if you have a mbox file named BOX01 and a directory name BOX01.sdb would show has one on the client side (note: that is the way

Hi, When user exceeds it's quota then dovecot can't create it's files and it's showing zero mails :( This also means that user is unable to delete it's own mails. Sounds like kind-of bug, right? Dec 15 08:28:37 mbox1 dovecot: IMAP(xxx): open(/var/mail/xxx/dovecot-uidlist.lock) failed: Disk quota exceeded Dec 15 08:28:37 mbox1 dovecot: IMAP(kdudus):

Hi! Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for some time and am struggling with systemd at every update. Fedora insists on setting ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service at every update of the packages. This makes my mailstore which is in /usr/local/var/mail Read-only. And this makes the incoming emails delivered through dovecot-lda disappear into /dev/null until I

On Monday 14 August 2017 10:22:54 Sander Lepik wrote: > 14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > PS! I really hate systemd - Destroys the UNIX way of > > doing things with a heavy axe.... > > Don't hate it, better learn to use it: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/systemd#Drop-in_files Cannot find a way to "remove" the ProtectSystem setting as there

We're converting UW-IMAP users here to dovecot. Some of them have seen the error message issued when Thunderbird clients try to delete folders and I understand what's going on (from previous postings) that Dovecot doesn't support mbox subfolders within folders. What puzzles me is that many of these users already have folders within folders (I've found typically 2 levels of

> Sounds like a strange policy, but do you mean you cannot have a dns server > that connects to the internet or just you cannot have a dns server ? > I can not have any of my linux machines connect in any way to the internet or the company servers. I could install a dns server with no forwarders as long as it is not on the company network. > > If the former, you should be aware

On 2017-10-28 11:51, Tobi wrote: > > Does anyone have an idea why dovecot suddenly behaves like that? > Since that's CentOS 7, I've heard SystemD tends to go mad (madder than usual) and mount the service with readonly paths... -- Vlad K.

There were some non-compatible changes in 2.2.27 that makes older versions of pigeonhole incompatible, when external programs are used. We moved the program-client code from pigeonhole to dovecot core and made some changes to it to facilitate other uses for it. Aki > On January 8, 2017 at 3:33 PM Tobi <tobster at brain-force.ch> wrote: > > > Hi Stephan > > thanks for

Hi Stephan thanks for insisting on the pigeonhole version. That seems to be the reason. With 0.4.16 I built the rpms again and after yum install on my mailbox servers the script "terminated normally" Just one thing that does not go in my brain so far: in 1 out of maybe 20 cases the script worked with 0.4.14 without an error. But thats not important as with 0.4.16 it works in 100% of

Yes, and it is not my use case, sadly. ACLs are meant for imap, not filesystem access and mail_access_groups is also useless for some reason. It just does not change anything. Probably because I don't use mail_location and variables when I provide path for home. (It's stored as is in a database on mailbox creation.) 26.12.2014, 12:07, "Tobi" <tobster at brain-force.ch>: