similar to: fts-solr: fresh start or reindex large mailboxes

Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,

I am experience situations where accessing the index results in a complete re-indexing of the model. I have not been able to detect a pattern. Under what circumstances does Ferret (or AAF) decide that it needs to rebuild the index? I''ll be happy to look at the code relevant to this if someone could direct me to it. Thanks, John

Hi friends I am using act_as_solr plugin for indexing my database for my application i am having huge volume data (700000 data) for this i am facing a problem it will take more then 6 to 7hrs to index the whole data is that any way to speed up the indexing process please help me friends -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk"

We are considering to update our Samba 3.0.5 PDC to 3.0.21 using samba-3.0.21b-1.i386.rpm, and rpm -Uvh --test works. Whe have openldap 2.3.11 as passwd backend with samba.schema taken from samba-3.0.14 but reading the docs (Samba-3 to Samba-3 Updates on the Same Server) it states: "it is necessary only to update the LDAP schema". How the LDAP schema updated and the ldap databases

Hi, I am currently testing a 2.1 dovecot setup with fts-solr. Search speed is simply amazing. I decided to try to delete and rebuild the solr indexes, but i can't seem to rebuild them thru dovecot. At first, when telnetting to the imap server, the search initially built the index, and then subsequent searches are blazingly fast. 1- I deleted all the solr indexes with the following query:

I posted to the list about this a while ago but never got a response, I have a bit more information now. Dovecot 2.2.12 and other 2.2 versions are broken when using zlib and maildir. If messages are re-indexed, the INTERNALDATE of all messages is set to the time the re-index is done. The problem seems to be in src/plugins/zlib/zlib-plugin.c in the function zlib_mail_cache_open. During a

Hi, an user is missing all mail from a folder and all subfolders which are still saved in the users maildir directory on the dovecot server. From an imap client she sees the main folder but empty. No subfolders. She told me with an other imap client and a new created account she has the same problem. Question: Can I resync / regenerate some folder... index.... something....-files from the

Hi, doveadm force-resync -u user FOLDER Sami > On 17 Jan 2019, at 13.32, Les <nagylzs at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have several users with Maildir format. After upgrading from 2.2 to 2.3, some directories could not be opened from thunderbird. The server log shows all kinds of errors including these: > > Corrupted record in index cache file

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 23/10/2020 15:03, Tom Diehl via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have 2 DC's. One is running 4.10.18 and the other is running 4.11.14. >> I am planning on upgrading the 4.10.18 DC to 4.11.14 and then both up to >> 4.12r.latest. >> >> In doing this I ran samba-tool dbcheck --reindex and got

Hi, I have 2 DC's. One is running 4.10.18 and the other is running 4.11.14. I am planning on upgrading the 4.10.18 DC to 4.11.14 and then both up to 4.12r.latest. In doing this I ran samba-tool dbcheck --reindex and got the following warning: (vdc1 pts8) # samba-tool dbcheck --reindex Re-indexing... ../../lib/ldb/ldb_key_value/ldb_kv_index.c:2413: duplicate attribute value in

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

Not sure if this is best sent to samba or samba-technical. If an admin thinks this is best sent to technical, let me know and I'll resend it there. Hi all, Well I've managed to land myself in a bit of a heap. I've been successfully running Samba4 at two schools I administer as well as my home test network, starting with alpha17 and now on beta8. Group Policy works a charm. But

Hi Running dovecot 2.1.7 (from debian repo). We have some old compressed maildir messages with the wrong S= size in the filename (our fault). If I delete index files, log in to the mailbox and try to FETCH the bad message, dovecot complains about the incorrect message size, attempts to fix the filename and disconnects the client. However, it changes the filesize to the size of the message on

Hello, I have several users with Maildir format. After upgrading from 2.2 to 2.3, some directories could not be opened from thunderbird. The server log shows all kinds of errors including these: Corrupted record in index cache file /home/user01/Maildir/.Elk&APw-ld&APY-tt/dovecot.index.cache: UID 2802: Broken physical size in mailbox Cached message size larger than expected (18 > 17,

Hi. It seems that dovecot is using the current time, not a maildir file's mtime for INTERNALDATE when a message is re-indexed: $ cd Index $ rm -rf .INBOX $ cd ../Maildir/cur $ stat * File: `1392914632.P54451Q0M08633.smtpin01,S=2215,W=2249:2,' Size: 960 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 1048576 regular file Device: 36h/54d Inode: 11132959 Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------)