similar to: authenticate as userA, but get authorization to user userB's account

Hello J?zsef, thanks for your super-fast response. Kadlecsik J?zsef <kadlecsik.jozsef at wigner.mta.hu> (Mi 25 Okt 2017 13:28:22 CEST): > > sales at example.com, using the credentials of the very own account (say > > hans at example.com)? > > We faced the same problem and solved it with a PAM module: ? > The users must use the username

Hi, On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > given a small organization. There are *personal* mailboxes (mailbox per > user, incl. subfolders et cetera). The users can share specic folders > via the ACL (we call it "other users/", Dovecot calls it "shared" > folder. Additionally there are mailboxes Dovecot calls "public" (we use > the

Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> (Mi 25 Okt 2017 14:44:26 CEST): ? > > additional account within the mail client (thunderbird) they use. From > > users perspective it is exactly what they want. But I dislike the idea > > of sharing the password. > > For what reason exactly? It not being personalized, too easy to leak, > potentially not expiring ever, ... ?

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Kadlecsik J?zsef <kadlecsik.jozsef at wigner.mta.hu> (Mi 25 Okt 2017 13:28:22 CEST): > > > sales at example.com, using the credentials of the very own account (say > > > hans at example.com)? > > > > We faced the same problem and solved it with a PAM module: > ? > > The users must use the username

On 10/25/2017 12:58 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > We could create new "role" users, share the password and create an > additional account within the mail client (thunderbird) they use. From > users perspective it is exactly what they want. But I dislike the idea > of sharing the password. For what reason exactly? It not being personalized, too easy to leak, potentially

* Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> 2017.10.25 12:58: > Question: Is there any way to split the authentication from the > authorization within common mail clients (as Thunderbird) in combination > with Dovecot. That is, doing something like logging in to the > account sales at example.com, using the credentials of the very own account > (say hans at example.com)?

Dovecot 2.0.13 on a 64 bit linux. We have an archiver account on one machine. Most mailing lists that handles go directly to it and everything is fine. However, there is one campus list that will only send to real people. So for that one I subscribed. When one of these messages comes in, which is 1-2x per week, I copy it to an export folder and then manually run a script which does: cat

> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote: > > > Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): > > Hi Aki, > > > > aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > > ? > > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/,

Hi, Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 21 Nov 2016 11:50:13 CET): > a) Routing stage > You need to interact with the user database dovecot uses. > Either you access the user database directory (flat file, LDAP, > whatever) or you use the ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to > dovecot. The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore. Using $

Hi, Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command, the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation: ? login ? C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1

Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 21:36:40 CEST): ? > > I see: > > > > a) pass the host *names* to the director too, for CN verification > > purpose > > > > May be in struct mail_host could be a field for the original > > hostname we used to obtain the adress(es)? > > Does the attached patch work? Compiles,

Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 00:10:50 CEST): > Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 23:49:20 CEST): > ? > > > > Proxying in general does check that hostname matches the SSL certificate, because both the hostname and IP address are sent to login process. So it should work in a way that host=<hostname> and

Hi, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> (Do 12 Nov 2015 23:31:39 CET): > According to a message to this list from Oli Schacher, > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-June/059493.html, all I need to do is copy the deleted > emails to their original folder and dovecot will take care of it: > ? > > exactly, just copy the mail from your backup back into the users > >

Am 08.07.2017 um 23:10 schrieb Heiko Schlittermann: > As it seem, Pigeonhole sends you the full cert chain: > >> *** Starting TLS handshake >> - Certificate type: X.509 >> - Got a certificate list of 3 certificates. >> - Certificate[0] info: >> - subject `C=DE,ST=Baden-Wuerttemberg,L=Ettlingen,O=NOVA Elektroanlagen > ? >> - Certificate[2] info:

Hi, Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST): > Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: > In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job" The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both /etc/init.d/dovecot /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service > While xi packages places its own init script

Hi Aki, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): ? > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try the xi.dovecot.fi packages. With 2.2.24 it works as expected. Due to the project state I'll

After adding the configuration bit: deny message = invalid recipient domains = +local_domains !verify = recipient/callout=no_cache from: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim> running update-exim4.conf and service exim4 restart the server is still accepting emails to recipients that do not exist in dovecot. Any ideas?

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup. On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of the backends. The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at RCPT TO time. Here is what I typed, connected to the director Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded! 220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot

Hello, I'm just asking myself, how I get multiple quota rules into the LDAP userdb. Dovecot is 2.2.9 userdb_attrs = ? fooQuotaRule=quota_rule=%$ which allows me to have an user db entry as fooQuotaRule: *:storage=1000:messages=50 fooQuotaRule: Trash:storage=500 But, if I'd like to have another quota rule for a submailbox of that user? doveadm user returns the first

Hello, using Dovecot 2.2.9 and a setup with directors and backends. The communication between directors and backends needs to be TLS secured. The director config contains a list of hostnames for the backends. (implicit list because of multiple A/AAAA records for a single hostname or explicit list of several host names) On connection setup from a client the director connects to the selected