similar to: master/master replications v. 2.2.32

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "master/master replications v. 2.2.32"

2017 Oct 24
0
Fwd: master/master replications v. 2.2.32
doveconf -n # 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.9 (Final) ext3 auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb doveadm_password = # hidden, use -P to show it doveadm_port = 61800 first_valid_uid = 150 last_valid_uid = 150 mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n mail_plugins = notify replication mail_privileged_group =
2017 Oct 25
0
Replication Issue
Hello, I've been trying to set up replication, Server A is dovecot 2.2.32 (upgrade from 2.0.9) and Server B is dovecot 2.2.10, I use mysql as userdb, I don't want to replicate every user on my database only especific users so I set my iterate_query on dovecot-sql.conf.ext file; my problem: doveadm replication is not "reading" my iterate_query, it tries to replicate every user.
2017 Oct 05
2
dovecot: master: Warning: Sent SIGKILL to 100 imap-login processes
Hi, I am using Dovecot 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4) I noticed lots of messages like: dovecot: master: Warning: Sent SIGKILL to 100 imap-login processes in /var/log/maillog I commented out "process_limit" service imap { # Most of the memory goes to mmap()ing files. You may need to increase this # limit if you have huge mailboxes. #vsz_limit = $default_vsz_limit # Max. number of IMAP
2017 Sep 29
1
2.2.32 'doveadm replicator replicate -f' segfault
Very minor bug; not specifying the user mask with 'doveadm replicator replicate -f' causes a segfault: server:~# doveadm replicator replicate -f Segmentation fault server:~# doveadm replicator replicate -f '*' 123 users updated server:~# gdb /usr/bin/doveadm core.2418 GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-100.el7 This GDB was configured as
2018 May 07
2
replicator: User listing returned failure
Hello. I've tried to configure TCP replication to slave server. But I got some errors... mx1:~# dovecot --version 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) From dovecot.log: May 07 19:27:41 auth-worker(34348): Warning: mysql: Query failed, retrying: Unknown column 'username' in 'field list' May 07 19:27:41 auth-worker(34348): Debug: sql(*): SELECT username, domain FROM users May 07 19:27:41
2017 Sep 26
3
dsync: assert panic on mbox // no INBOX sync on hybrid mbox/maildir
Hi, This (hopefully!) might be a case of user error, as I'm new to dovecot... Alternatively it might be some confusion in an index, since I've been mucking about trying different things in my configuration files and had frequent crashes. I'm trying to sync 2 (LAN) hosts, ideally to have full automatic replication happening. They both have hybrid mbox INBOX and maildir++ folders,
2017 Oct 30
4
Replication to wrong mailbox
It happened now twice that replication created folders and mails in the wrong mailbox :( Here's the architecture we use: - 2 Dovecot (2.2.32) backends in two different datacenters replicating via a VPN connection - Dovecot directors in both datacenters talks to both backends with vhost_count of 100 vs 1 for local vs remote backend - backends use proxy dict via a unix domain socket and socat
2019 Oct 24
1
SQL iterate_query
I've been hunting some ghost mailboxes - and I *think* I found the source. I use the complete email address as the username, and store such in a database. The storage structure is location=/var/mail/%d/%n. Not unusual I think. So all I *should* see from "ls /var/mail" would be a list of domains. But I keep seeing empty mailboxes being created at this level. Having corrected a
2019 Jan 04
1
Unexpected accounts showing up in replication status (doveadm replicator status '*')
I have a replication set up with two dovecot 2.3.4 servers. Messages appear to be replicating fine between them, however there is an oddity when I run doveadm replicator status '*' and I'm worried work is being carried out needlessly. Both machines have identical configs and have a mysql backend for username/passwords.? Both machines point to the same mysql server and same
2012 Aug 31
1
dovecotadm error
When I use the following command: doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 28d I get: doveadm(root): Error: User listing returned failure In the mail log file it says: dovecot: auth-worker(18549): Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table 'system.users' doesn't exist (using built-in default iterate_query: SELECT username, domain FROM users) However this is setup:
2012 Oct 11
1
iterate_query does not use userdb - mail_location not found
Hi dovecot-comminity, can't get iterate_query working. doveadm cannot find mail_location which comes from userdb query. dovecot itself works fine with sql. Whats wrong? please help: [root at glen exim]# /opt/dovecot/bin/doveadm search -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 90d doveadm(uwe at mitmachnet.de): Error: user uwe at mitmachnet.de: Initialization failed:
2010 Aug 27
2
doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d
In the shell: ,doveadm(root): Error: User listing returned failure,doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users In the log: dovecot: auth: Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table 'mail.users' doesn't exist (using built-in default iterate_query: SELECT username, domain FROM users) Why is dovecot trying to "select username, domain from users" when the
2018 Aug 10
2
Error compiling pigeonhole managesieve 0.4.24
Hi i have a problem compiling as mantioned on object of this mail: i'm changing dovecot on my debian 6 from version 2.2.32 to 2.2.36 and pigeonhole from 0.4.20 to 0.4.24 this is output of dovecot -n for listing versions installed dovecot -n # 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.20 (7cd71ba) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.10 i have
2010 Aug 18
1
Plotting K-means clustering results on an MDS
Hello All, I'm having some trouble figuring out what the clearest way to plot my k-means clustering result on an my existing MDS. First I performed MDS on my distance matrix (note: I performed k-means on the MDS coordinates because applying a euclidean distance measure to my raw data would have been inappropriate) canto.MDS<-cmdscale(canto) I then figured out what would be my optimum
2019 Aug 09
2
What does `iterate_query` for SQL want as output?
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > >> On 09/08/2019 22:16 Coy Hile via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> In an earlier thread, https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-August/116694.html I got a lot of useful help about migration. On my older host, everything
2020 Apr 22
5
replication newbie: some beginner questions
Am 22.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > iterate_query = SELECT username as user FROM mailbox Ok, we enabled the 2 users and they synced (after a restart of one dovecot, btw). What irritates me: on the new server I find less files in /home/vmail than on the old server. So something is skipped or so. I try to compare now ..
2017 Nov 20
2
LMTP "Relative home directory paths not supported"
On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote: >> I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior >> to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped >> by LMTP reporting >> >> ??? dovecot: lmtp(10019, jeff at example.com): Error: Relative home >> directory paths not
2023 Feb 19
2
Redundant Database, Pgsql ?
I am aware that there are provising for redundant database connections Basically i was working on my main db server (which is also a mail sever) I current have this in the dovecot-pgsql.conf ______________________________________________________________________ driver = pgsql connect = host=localhost port=5433 dbname=scom_billing user=pgsql password=xxxxxxxxx default_pass_scheme = PLAIN
2019 Aug 09
2
What does `iterate_query` for SQL want as output?
Hi all, In an earlier thread, https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-August/116694.html I got a lot of useful help about migration. On my older host, everything was static; on the newer host, I?m storing user information in Postgres. usernames are of the form <login at REALM>, say ?hile at coyhile.com? as basically a Kerberos principal, and authentication and individual lookups work.
2023 Jan 06
1
replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating 268435496 bytes
How problematic is it to have default_vsz_limit = 0 in dovecot.conf? macOS+MacPorts had this as a requirement even. Gerben > On 6 Jan 2023, at 16:49, Paul Kudla <paul at scom.ca> wrote: > > > i ran into this as well > > here is the full config for mine with replication > > # cat dovecot.conf > # 2.3.14 (cee3cbc0d): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > #