similar to: Filtering by country

I thought I read somewhere that the hostnames on replicated dovecot servers had to be different. Is this simply the hostname you specify in the config for dovecot and can this be different than the actual unix hostname? Ethon B. > On Oct 11, 2017, at 11:04 PM, Anvar Kuchkartaev <anvar at anvartay.com> wrote: > > If you are using different hostname for each server then you need

For a global filter, that is filter all accounts, I use the data provided by ip2location. I put the CIDRs for all the countries where I don't plan on sending or retrieving mail in the ipfw firewall. Block all mail ports other than 25. Noye by not blocking 25, you can still receive email independent of the countries you blocked. You just can send or retrieve via pop/images. This assumes an

Can someone help me understand the overall picture of SSL certificates in this scenario? I have a working dovecot/postfix/mysql server. It has a certificate. I now want to create a second, essentially duplicate configured server for use with replication. What is the relationship between the certificate and the hostname, or the DNS entry since the certs are created using the server?s domain

The dovecot instance set up with auth_realms and auth_default_realm variables and it is working well. In saslauthd configurations setting same variables giving configuration parsing error (I think it is not right way to configure kerberos realm in saslauthd). However testsaslauthd working without any problems even if I don't specify realm parameter from command line. On 03/10/17 06:17,

If you are using different hostname for each server then you need different certificates or SAN certificate with corresponding subjectAltName extensions. Certificates verifies hostname so if your hostnames are different then you have to use different certificates. However it is more useful if you keep your server hostname and service hostname separately. Your server hostnames might be

Hello I just finished setting up FreeIPA with Dovecot + Postfix + Saslauthd. I can easily access to mails using imap via dovecot with gssapi authentication and postfix also delivering mails very well. But I cannot send email from postfix using gssapi authentication (plain and login authentication working fine) because saslauthd is not specifying realm when requesting service from freeipa domain.

On 10/02/2017 07:00 PM, Anvar Kuchkartaev wrote: > Hello I just finished setting up FreeIPA with Dovecot + Postfix + Saslauthd. I can easily access to mails using imap via dovecot with gssapi authentication and postfix also delivering mails very well. But I cannot send email from postfix using gssapi authentication (plain and login authentication working fine) because saslauthd is not

No, it's entirely my own. If all you want to do is write client IP addresses to a database then your script will probably fit in 20 lines of code or so. On 10/20/2017 05:04 PM, j.emerlik wrote: > Which one policy server are you using ? > Someone from that list : http://www.postfix.org/addon.html > > 2017-10-20 16:53 GMT+02:00 Gedalya <gedalya at gedalya.net>: > >>

Aha. Looks pretty cool, and it's really nice that it supports HTTP. On the other hand if I'm rate limiting the number of messages sent = number of times a client said RCPT TO, I guess it still has to be a postfix policy server? Anyway, thanks for pointing this out, I'm sure I'll use it :-) On 10/21/2017 02:16 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Dovecot auth supports auth_policy_server

Hi, I'm trying to set Weakforced with Dovecot and I cannot log in policy server. This is the config: /root/weakforced/wforce/wforce.conf ----------------------------------- ... webserver("0.0.0.0:8084", "super") ... /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-policy.conf ---------------------------------- auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/ #auth_policy_hash_nonce = wforce:super

Hi Aki, I've configured in this way: vm-weakforced:~# printf 'wforce:super' | base64 d2ZvcmNlOnN1cGVy vm-weakforced:~# cat /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-policy.conf auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/ auth_policy_hash_nonce = some random string auth_policy_server_api_header = "Authorization: Basic d2ZvcmNlOnN1cGVy With the same result... > WforceWebserver: HTTP

I've been playing with weakforced, so it fills in the 'fail2ban across a cluster' niche (not to mention RBLs). It seems to work well, once you've actually read the docs :) I was curious if anyone had played with it and was *very* curious if anyone was using it in high traffic production. Getting things to 'work' versus getting them to work *and* handle a couple hundred

On 11/04/2019 14:33, Anton Dollmaier via dovecot wrote: >> Which is why a dnsbl for dovecot is a good idea. I do not believe the >> agents behind these login attempts are only targeting me, hence the >> addresses should be shared via a dnsbl. > > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > attempts and dnsbl): > >>

On 12/04/2019 08:24, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > Weakforced uses Lua so you can easily integrate DNSBL support into it. How does this help Dovecot block? A link to some documentation or example perhaps? > We will not add DNSBL support to dovecot at this time. Is there a reason why you will not support this RFE?

Hello, given the 2015 revision date, I was curious if anyone can confirm https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Timeouts is still accurate where the 'before login' IMAP timeout remains hard coded? We're having an issue where blocks of IP's from China and similar locations are crawling IP ranges trying common login credentials, and hanging the connections open in the process. We have clients

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On 19.07.2017 02:38, Mark Moseley wrote: > > I've been playing with weakforced, so it fills in the 'fail2ban across a > > cluster' niche (not to mention RBLs). It seems to work well, once you've > > actually read the docs :) > > > > I was curious if

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> wrote: > On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: > > I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately. > There > > are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where > > it'd be nice to skip the auth policy (internal hosts that I can trust,

does anyone know of a linux module (maybe similar to fail2ban) that could be installed which would monitor email logs (sign ins) and alert the user to any suspicious activity on their account? i suspect it would need to log geo location, device type and ip address to a database. it seems like a module like this would be very useful and should exist already? thanks in advance

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> > wrote: > > > >> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: > >>> I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced

Hi everyone. Good Morning., Do anyone know how to integrate ip2location code in Ruby on Rails project. Please visit the Links for details. http://www.ip2location.com/ruby.aspx They have Ruby code works with some C module. I am finding little difficult to integrate with an existing work. Could anyone help me will be thankful. Thanks in advance. Amjith PS -- Posted via