similar to: Dovecot 2.2.31 Incorrect Search

Hi. I found that the problem emerges when the dovecot uses fts-solr plugin. without it this problem does not emerge. No one has any ideas? 2017-10-12 18:39 GMT+02:00 Siarhei Chystsiakou <brestows at gmail.com>: > > Hi. > I have installed dovecot 2.2.31 and fts plugin with Apache Solr 6.6.1. > I have found that imap search is not correct in my dovecot. For example, I > want

Can I used the patch on dovecot 2.1.17 ? 2017-09-21 11:17 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but > after > > the setting I get the following error .... > > > > o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase

This patch is not valid for dovecot 2.1.17 :( Will my config (dovecot 2.1.17) be suitable for the dovecot => 2.2.19 ? Thanks 2017-09-21 12:05 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > Probably, it's a small change. =) > > Aki > > > On 21.09.2017 13:01, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote: > > Can I used the patch on dovecot 2.1.17 ? > > > >

Hello. I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but after the setting I get the following error .... o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad contentType for search handler :text/xml request={q=from:"test"&fl=uid,score&sort=uid+asc&fq=%2Bbox:a8012d2edac165591d3c000043730d65+%2Buser:" user at

Probably, it's a small change. =) Aki On 21.09.2017 13:01, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote: > Can I used the patch on dovecot 2.1.17 ? > > 2017-09-21 11:17 GMT+02:00 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >> >> On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote: >>> Hello. >>> I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but

On 20.09.2017 12:51, Siarhei Chystsiakou wrote: > Hello. > I'm trying to set fts plugin for working with Apache Solr 6.6.1, but after > the setting I get the following error .... > > o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad > contentType for search handler :text/xml >

On Thursday 03 February 2011 14:14:28 Renato Golin wrote: > On 3 February 2011 10:25, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have submitted a bug some time ago to LLVM bugtracker: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8931 > > Hi Siarhei, > > This is a really silly bug with a simple fix. > > We have a similar patch here

Hi, I have submitted a bug some time ago to LLVM bugtracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8931 The problem is that I'm trying to use clang in linux system, running on ARM hardware. And this bug, as trivial as it is, seems to be a major showstopper. I wonder if I'm the only one trying to use LLVM/clang in this configuration or doing something in an unusual way? Anyway, the LLVM

On 3 February 2011 10:25, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote: > I have submitted a bug some time ago to LLVM bugtracker: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8931 Hi Siarhei, This is a really silly bug with a simple fix. We have a similar patch here locally, but as this is part of another set of patches we were waiting for it to stabilise. There are some

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday 03 February 2011 14:14:28 Renato Golin wrote: >> On 3 February 2011 10:25, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> > wrote: >> > I have submitted a bug some time ago to LLVM bugtracker: >> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8931 >>

On Friday 25 February 2011 22:28:14 Jason Kim wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Siarhei Siamashka > > <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 03 February 2011 14:14:28 Renato Golin wrote: > >> On 3 February 2011 10:25, Siarhei Siamashka > >> <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > >> > I have

Hi everyone, Well, we lost power here again.  I was not at home, but I guess a dump truck smashed into some power poles and took out half the city; actually tripped most of the breakers in the panel.  Anyways, the power was out for just a few seconds and of course my servers shutdown on me after power being out for just a second or two.  Here is my syslog from two different machines.  I included

upsmon.conf on server:  https://pastebin.com/z4CrUTxb nut.conf on server:  https://pastebin.com/540ShZH7 Permissions for /etc/nut:  https://hastebin.com/qecolodapi.diff On the Synology (I didn’t edit any of these files): ups.conf:  https://hastebin.com/dedereqizi.shell upsd.conf:  https://hastebin.com/pupeseweda.css upsd.users:  https://hastebin.com/ocenamecex.cs I don’t think I am able to run

Wow. That’s weird. Blank for me too! I will send again when I get home. Sorry about that! -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 10, 2020, 9:01 AM -0400, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org>, wrote: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > > > Here is the /usr/syno/bin/synoups file > > https://hastebin.com/sibopejuyu.bash > > Firefox, Opera, w3m,

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > synoups: https://hastebin.com/xexafofiha.bash Wow! What a mess. It looks as if Synology wanted to write their own "NUT", but decided it would be easier to put their ideas in a script when they saw they could use upssched.conf to call it. NUT intends such a script for timer management. Synology use it for general system management.

Hi Roger, Here is the /usr/syno/bin/synoups file https://hastebin.com/sibopejuyu.bash Thanks, Todd -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 9, 2020, 4:49 PM -0400, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org>, wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > > > upssched.conf (on Synology): > > CMDSCRIPT /usr/syno/bin/synoups > > > > upssched-cmd (on

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > I asked here for kind of reference GCC version which LLVM development > team is using for *native* testing on ARM hardware. (no cross > compilation!) last week or so. I've been curious myself how the > situation looks and so I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM >

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > APC Back-UPS NS 650M1 UPS ---USB---> Synology NAS (DS416 - Master?) > ---Ethernet---> Netgear Managed Switch w/ uplink to router <---Ethernet--- > Servers (Ubuntu 20.04 - Plex, Pulsar, Proton - All three set as slaves) I'm guessing that the UPS supplies only the NAS, not the 3 Ubuntu machines. Do they have their own UPS's?

On 8/12/20 3:42 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 8/12/20 3:20 AM, Todd Benivegna wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Well, we lost power here again.  I was not at home, but I guess a >> dump truck smashed into some power poles and took out half the city; >> actually tripped most of the breakers in the panel.  Anyways, the >> power was out for just a few seconds

Hello all! I was looking through the results of disassembling a heavily-used short function in the program I'm working on, and ended up wondering why LLVM was generating that assembly and what changes would be necessary to improve the code. I asked on #llvm, but it seems that the people with the necessary expertise weren't around. Here is a condensed version of the code: