similar to: Mail Alias Stores in mySQL Not working

"In an earlier post you said your user_query was: user_query = SELECT CONCAT('/var/vmail/mail/', maildir) AS home, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid, CONCAT('*:bytes=', quota) AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active=?1' Last post you said: mail is stored at /var/mail/vhosts and: mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n These don't agree

"So abuse at kasdivi.com <mailto:abuse at kasdivi.com> is an alias, not a user.? You can't login with an alias because your user_query is looking at the`mailbox` table. Have your tried logging in as: admin at theoceanwindow.com <mailto:admin at theoceanwindow.com> OR you could put an entry forabuse at kasdivi.com <mailto:forabuse at kasdivi.com> in your `mailbox`

"You have the alias abuse at kasdivi.com <mailto:abuse at kasdivi.com> for the address admin at theoceanwindow.com <mailto:admin at theoceanwindow.com> in your db and all mail to these aliases should go the the admin@ mailbox. Address mapping should be done in postfix so that the recipient address that gets used on the lmtp connection to dovecot is admin at theoceanwindow.com

"With that query, it appears everyone is sharing the same mail directory.? It, of course, depends on the value of `maildir`.? It doesn't look right.? stored by domain or at least it was until i started messing with mysql "Have you checked your MySQL log file to see the actual query?? hmm found out i had never enabled that log?. another tangent I need to follow "We don't

First of all excuse.. I am having an issue getting maillist responses so I may be responding to this worng No on topic I commented out the first user_quesry The second query was not copied correctly , reads user_query = SELECT CONCAT('/var/vmail/mail/', maildir) AS home, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid, CONCAT('*:bytes=', quota) AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u'

This apparently was a problem that i was not aware since i redid my mail server configuration to make use of Postfixadmin. I have update the conf files using the postfix document fromthe down load. The download document seems to be fpr an early version of dovecot (I am using 2.2.4) as it focuse of dovecot.conf which is now broken into file in the conf.d subdirectory I get "dovecot:

All, There are 3 bugfix updates for CentOS-4 (RC1). 1. mod_perl needed to be recompiled after the RH errata for perl was incorporated, but it was not flagged by the perl update. ( https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803 ) (thanks Joshua Hirsh) 2. httpd identified itself as Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server instead of CentOS ( https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=806 ) (thanks

Trying to implement expire plugin. expire-tool works fine. This delete expunged messages but not all of them. I have duplicate messages in appropriate folder. These messages are from expanding postfix aliases (e.g. postmaster@, hostmaster@, abuse@ etc. points to same mailbox and spam often sent to all of them. If duplicate message is received only one entry in dovecot-uidlist is created and only

First I'd like to thank all the developers and contributors to dovecot. I've been using it for many years, and deeply appreciate your fine work. :) dovecot --version 2.2.22 (fe789d2) I have a working installation with postfix and dovecot, and I want to add sieve to it, so I am trying to configure postfix to use lmtp instead of 'virtual' for its delivery service. However it is

Le 27/05/2019 à 09:50, Rowland penny via samba a écrit : > On 27/05/2019 08:28, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located >> on 7 AD sites. >> I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated >> to the last DC that was joined to the domain. >> But this DC is

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

Am 17.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 17/12/15 14:56, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 17.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 17/12/15 13:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Rowland, thank you, but before we do that: >>>> >>>> - what now with the 'gc' record? 2nd DC yes or no? >>> >>> Which one

On 29/02/16 11:51, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny:

Hi I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located on 7 AD sites. I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated to the last DC that was joined to the domain. But this DC is located on one of the remote sites. Is this behavior normal or would it be better if I updated this record via "samba-tool dns update" to point it to one of my 3 main

hai, ? I just noticed, after my pc woke up my A record disapearred. of my 64bit windows. ? ? Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: client 10.249.250.64#49271: update 'INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD/IN' denied Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone

On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >>>> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you

Hi, I demoted my PDC (DC1) forcefully, because replication (among others) wasn't working anymore due to hard disk failure and I was afraid of spending a lot of time on nothing. With DC1 offline I seized the FSMO roles on DC2 (4.2.5), restarted Samba, and found errors in the samba log due to the missing DC1. I removed the two DNS entries created according to this site:

On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >> >> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, >> so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should >> have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my

Am 31.07.19 um 15:59 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Ok, after that reboot > > ! Note, atm dont care about secrets.keytab (yet) > .. I was a bit ahead with things... > > One thing at a time, for the keytab to be corrected, you need a perfect correct working > A PTR CNAME GUIDs for the DC(3) first then we start thinking in kerberos corrections. > > Run

On 11/20/2015 10:17 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2015-11-20 15:11 GMT+01:00 James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>>: > > On 11/20/2015 7:40 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > > Am 20.11.2015 um 11:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: > > Hi Ole, > > I'm still not answering your issue