similar to: dovecot umask for mail boxes

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

Hello, list ! Dovecot version is 2.2.27, running on Centos 6.7. Postfix is receiving mail and putting it into mailboxes. Dovecot just serves IMAP/POP3 connections to mailboxes. Virtual users are stored in DB. The problem is in directory mode (and thus file mode) for new mailboxes upon it's creation. If I create new record for new mailbox in DB and send mail to it, Postfix will create

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

* vadim <vadim at ideco.ru> 2017.08.23 16:04: > I am unable to enforce dovecot to create mailboxes with 660 permissions. > Output of dovecot -n is in the attachment. > > Please tell me what's the right way to control mailbox permissions ? Hi Vadmin, inject the mails per LMTP rather than having Postfix save them directly and let Dovecot worry about the permissions:

All, Here is a request for Zimbra to provide official CentOS support: http://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23487 Here is a poll that might help them see how many CentOS Customers they REALLY have: http://www.zimbra.com/forums/users/14136-foss-edition-most-popular-linux-distro.html I am not asking for anyone to do anything mean, or to say anything untrue, in fact, please don't. I am

Hello all, Does doveadm backup - backup the attachments as well when using SIS ? Regards Durga Prasad +919849111010 -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Marc St?rmer Sent: 09 April 2018 18:05 To: Steve Atkins Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: {Spam?} Re: Filesystem level backups? Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: > Will a

On 15 Nov 2012, at 12:31, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > - Easier third-party merging. Merging via git merge/rebase is MUCH > simpler than merging a tarball from svn. I know the llvm leaders > don't seem to care about this but it is a real issue for many users. > > - Ease of fork/merge. git makes it easy to experiment with long-lived > development branches. svn

Does anyone know where I can get the latest puppet, 2.7.1 as RPM''s? The spec file that comes with the puppet 2.7.1 source is broken again, and only version 0.25.5 seems to be available via EPEL, which means that the website''s assertion that you can get puppet as an RPM from there is somewhat untrue. Douglas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

I have a Samba server where I established disk quotas for each user. When I check the free space from Windows its shows correctly the used space, but not the total space: I have set 100 MB soft limit, 200 MB hard limit and one user has used 150 MB, and it shows "150 MB used / 0 bytes free". When the user logs off, Windows complains that it can't store the roaming profile due to

When running an executable file (such as a patch for a game), I get an error message saying that the installer couldn't start, and that I may be out of disk space. I'm fairly certain this is untrue. I'm pretty new to Linux. Anybody able to help?

I am trying to get away from courier imap because it is flaky the way it uses FAM (or gamin in my case), and the developers seem to have a chip on their collective shoulder, and it is too complex. I found dovecot because it is ships with CentOS 4 (ie Red Hat Enterprise 4). It looks like just what I need: simple, fast. But I can't use it! I can't authenticate. If any of these statements

On 7/20/07, Geoff Shang <geoff@quitelikely.com> wrote: > I don't ever recall reading about the equivalent of Vorbis comments in Speex. I believe Speex supports Vorbis Comments. Vorbis Comments should probably be renamed to Ogg Comments, because most if not all Xiph codecs (e.g. FLAC and Theora) use it in some form. God, I hope I'm not wrong about this; lately I have said so

While looking at someone's question on this list led me to the mclust package, and from there to its license. Excerpts: Except for strict academic use, use of MCLUST (by itself or through other packages) requires payment of an annual license fee and completion of a license agreement found at the following URL: http://depts.washington.edu/ventures/UW_Technology/Express_Licenses/mclust.php 1.

On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:08 -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 13:25 -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > >> > As it seems my intuition is wrong, I am very

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> enabling vectorization gets the performance down by 80% on ARM. >> I will prepare a reduced testcase and try to find out the reason. >> As a first shot, I would say that this comes from the vectorization of >> code in a loop and the overhead of transfer between scalar and >> vector

Dear all, I am experiencing problems with glmmmPQL. I am trying to analyze binomial data with some spatial autocorrelation. Here is my code and some of the outputs > colnames(d.glmm) [1] "BV" "Longitude" "Latitude" "nb_pc_02" "nb_expr_02" [6] "pc_02" "nb_pc_07" "nb_expr_07"

Hi, I have a student trying to run R on an Apple (OS 10.3.9). She tried to cut-and-paste the data via the code: data<-read.table(pipe("pbpaste")) But she keeps getting the error message: 'error in pipe("pbpaste"): pipe connections are not available on this system' I do not know much about using an Apple. Has anyone run into this before? Does anyone have any ideas

David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> writes: > On 15 Nov 2012, at 12:31, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > >> - Easier third-party merging. Merging via git merge/rebase is MUCH >> simpler than merging a tarball from svn. I know the llvm leaders >> don't seem to care about this but it is a real issue for many users. >> >> - Ease of

Talin wrote: > Jon wrote: > > Talin wrote: > > > Garbage collection is still way too difficult. > > > > This is completely untrue. > > I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree... I failed to get my point across. You're still talking about the difficulty of using LLVM's GC support. I was talking about circumventing it. The shadow stack HLVM uses

Up until now I've been backing up my IMAP server by taking an atomic snapshot of the entire VM, so I've not really had to worry about it. I'm moving to hosting where I have neither VM snapshots nor a filesystem that can take snapshots, so I need to think about consistent backups a bit more. Will a simple backup of all the files of an multi-dbox give me a consistent state when I