similar to: Question (haven't tried yet)

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

And further funny things ... By pasting "message headers" in the message body I got a truckload of forensic reports ! Looks like there something amiss in the DKIM/DMARC realm ! --Ivan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3970 bytes Desc: Signature cryptographique S/MIME URL:

Le 4/9/2018 ? 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a ?crit?: > Hello all, > Does doveadm backup - backup the attachments as well when using SIS ? > As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created more problems than it solved - especially permission issues). I backup up all my mailboxes - then made them

Bonjour, I'm finishing the upgrade of an old installation of Dovecot/postfix mail system for my lab. In the configuration i plan ( dovecot 2.2.27 ), i choose to use: - mdbox format - single storage for attachements - 2 zfs file systems, one for mdboxes, the other for attachments The last tests before production concern my hability to restore a lost mail (or mailbox) ... (lot of

Still on the problem with dovecot 2.2.27 .... I use the single instance storage, and mdbox format. I use 2 zfs file systems, one for mailboxes, the other for attachements. I use znapzend to generate many zfs snapshots for backup purpose (inode numbers are preserved but it is unusefull). When I try to restore a deleted/purged mailbox with doveadm import I get the error of the first attachement

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

Hello all, Does doveadm backup - backup the attachments as well when using SIS ? Regards Durga Prasad +919849111010 -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Marc St?rmer Sent: 09 April 2018 18:05 To: Steve Atkins Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: {Spam?} Re: Filesystem level backups? Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins: > Will a

On 4/9/2018, 11:34:40 AM, Ivan Warren <ivan at vmfacility.fr> wrote: > Le 4/9/2018 ? 4:56 PM, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet a ?crit?: >> Does doveadm backup backup the attachments as well when using SIS? > As far as I know, it does (it de-shares shared attachments) > > I've used that solution to stop using SIS at one point (it created > more problems than it solved

Hello all, I am encountering the following issue : I have 2 dovecot servers with 2 way replication. Everything works fine except for one specific issue : When my MUA (thunderbird) filters (junk & manual) refile a mail from my inbox, I then sometimes find multiple copies of the original message in the destination folder. I have seen the following log entries which make me think (but

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 18:31 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too long.? I think > we should to get DMA API implementation in with a conservative > policy like this rather than waiting until we achieve perfection. > I'm tired of carrying these patches around. Yeah, do it. However,,, shouldn't the generic no-op DMA ops be

Hello, I am encountering a linking failure when using Control Flow Integrity while building a shared library. It looks like the wrong relocation type is being emitted for functions referenced via the PLT. I am using clang 3.9. The error message I get is: /usr/bin/ld.gold: error: /tmp/lto-llvm-df723d.o: requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc against 'free' which may overflow at runtime;

Hi, I am using clang++3.9 to build a simple program with both CFI and safe-stack. I am getting linker errors when combining -fsanitize=safe-stack, -fsanitize=cfi, and -fno-sanitize-trap=all. Combining safe-stack and CFI without -fno-sanitize-trap=all works as expected. It looks like clang is attempting to link in two compiler-rt libraries, one for ubsan and one for safestack, and this causes

On 03/11/2015 07:17 AM, E.B. wrote: > > Might be unpredictable caching. Might be the error didn't go away > last time I recreated due to different methods of creating the files. > Who knows, I think I should give up and stop spamming the list > with uneducated guesswork. No - no spam at least for me. Please see the thread with subject "Sieve permissions issue following

On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Please see the thread with subject >> "Sieve permissions issue following update" >> I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month >> on the hint of Stephan. Yesterday I started to test the currenr RCs. >> >> First I was disappointed, because the error

Hi all, we run dovecot for a long time now with no complains from the users ? until this week. Some users say, the search in mailfolders from iPhone (which only stores a few mails and search most on the server as I know) or our web mailer (SOGo, which I currently search also on the imap server) is ?slow?. As this is sort of individual experience, I was thinking of ways to speed up the search and

I have reported on bugzilla, link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943399; But this seems to only support ovirt. Then?opened an issue on CentOS community;link: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=18131; Thanks. jasonrao From: centos-virt-request Date: 2021-03-16 20:00 To: centos-virt Subject: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to

I've noticed that the nb decoder uses floating point in several places even when using FIXED_POINT. I don't have to deal with lost packets, so I'm mainly interested in innov_gain and pgain in no transmission mode (nb_celp.c around line 1272) and g and exci in vocoder mode (around line 1557). Is there a reason that these places must use floating point, or would it be possible to

is it safe to compile libspeex with -O3? I've changed all the asm's to asm volatile, but I don't know if there's other problems O3 would cause. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2363 bytes Desc: smime.p7s Url :

I would guess that the sampleenc and sampledec programs (I think they're in the doc dir) would be closer to what you want. On Apr 28, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: > Hi, > > I want to take a .wav and generate a bytestream that I can feed direct > to speex_decode(). The speexenc program appears to produce it wrapped > up in an ogg stream, and it doesn't have

Hi there, I''m working on a new student portal system using Rails for a large university. As part of this application, I plan on students being able to customize their own calendar, collection of commonly used links, aggregation of newsfeeds (from the university, student groups, etc), and to see a listing of major announcements they should be aware of. It seems to me, to make the most