similar to: FTS Lucene Search by Word Parts

Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing? I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos. The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get install it. I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I

Hi! 2.2.35 is not unstable, but apparently it is in debian distribution, which is called 'unstable'. Aki On 27.04.2018 06:16, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* > > On

Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? > I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. > >

Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. Thank you! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Cedric M <cedric.malitte at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > did you check in unstable ? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot

Hi, did you check in unstable ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot 2018-04-26 16:43 GMT-04:00 Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com>: > hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a > stretch-backport repos, right? > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK -

hmm I think I should use stretch instead of jessie, OR I should use a stretch-backport repos, right? Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in > Debian

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hi, I can't figure how to install latest stable dovecot version 2.2.35 in Debian Jessie If I follow this guide <https://repo.dovecot.org/>, it ends up installing 2.3 If I follow this guide <https://wiki.dovecot.org/PrebuiltBinaries#preview>, it ends up installing either 2.2.13 if I use "stable" or 2.2.36 alpha if I use "jessie" I see that 2.2.35 seems to be

Hello Jack, yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on cephfs. Thanks for the advise. I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was true in sdbox too. Thanks again. We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore backend. We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes and readings.

Hello, The following errors are constantly popping up for 2 accounts. I can't get it fixed, I did doveadm backup to another account, the same happens in the new account. I did doveadm force-resync, the problem persists. I'm using dovecot 2.2. 2017-08-18T11:46:12.472821881Z Aug 18 11:46:12 lmtp(ramon.lacerda at alliar.com): Warning: mdbox

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > This is fixed in next release (2.2.32) with > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c8be394 > > Aki Tuomi > As this is still a release candidate, I'm thinking of running an isolated instance of this version, and do doveadm force-resync just to fix just this user's mailbox. What do you

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> > wrote: > >> >> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate >> their local caches and >> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies. >> >> Sami

Hi, I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're missing. Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage that thousands of "m." files are still there, summing up 19GB of files. doveconf -n http://termbin.com/7lgc I have tried: accessing via IMAP accessing via doveadm search/fetch/mailbox status doveadm index doveadm

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? > > Hello Aki, yes I did that, but I didn't remove the map files first (I don't know if that's required). I can do it again if needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil*

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate their > local caches and > redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies. > > Sami > > I don't think so. Been using imapsync for large scale migrations from external servers to our dovecot setup. Users

Have you attempted doveadm force-resync -u SUPPRESSED_VICTIM "*"? Aki > On December 7, 2017 at 7:00 PM Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have a user account that had almost 20GB of emails and now they're > missing. > Only a few are available trough IMAP or doveadm. > > I can see in /path/to/mailbox/storage

On 18.08.2017 14:55, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Hello, > > The following errors are constantly popping up for 2 accounts. I can't get > it fixed, > I did doveadm backup to another account, the same happens in the new > account. > I did doveadm force-resync, the problem persists. > > I'm using dovecot 2.2. > > 2017-08-18T11:46:12.472821881Z Aug 18

Hello Florent, How did you proceed with the upgrade? Did you follow the recommended steps guide to upgrade ceph? (mons first, then OSDs, then MDS) Did you interrupt dovecot before upgrading the MDS specially? Did you remount the filesystem? Did you upgrade the ceph client too? Give people the complete scene and someone might be able to help you. Ask on ceph-users list too. Regards, Webert

Hi, some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider, discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph. The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS. We

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple