similar to: Large Scale Cluster using dsync and tagged director

Anyone had any experience they can share using a director setup with NFS and using the mdbox format instead of maildir. Is locking an issue on index files ?? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>

Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house move and whilst I could use rsync have been trying to get to grips with dsync. However, I seem to have an issue - my current server specifies mail_location as maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs and my imapc config on new server is as follows ... imapc_host = old.mailserver.host imapc_user = %u imapc_master_user =

Sigh ... ok so had if statement in SQL land that appended LAYOUT=fs if Maildir which explains the non-converting folder layout but NOT why the process is not picking up the actual contents of INBOX ... Matt > Matt Bryant <mailto:matt at the-bryants.net> > 13 May 2018 at 8:01 pm > Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house > move and whilst I could use

So virtual/combined was meant to combine INBOX/Sent/Drafts and virtual/all display them in a threaded manner .. at least that was the intention ... rgds Matt > Aki Tuomi <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > 18 February 2018 at 11:10 pm > > Uhm. > > combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails > from Sent and Drafts. > > Not sure what your

Stupid question but if dovecot mdbox is configured using alt path storage on a bi directional dysnc replicated pair of servers ... will the doveadm altmove need to be run on both halves of the cluster ??? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

hmm down graded to 2.2.19 and dont see the issue .. other issues particularly a segfault in libstorage to do with virtual .. but at least mails seem to be appearing correctly and cant seem to replicate what I have seen in 2.2.33.2 as an aside .. outlook on mac doesnt appear to like 2.2.33.2 either .. seeing same kind of issue where some messages not appearing in inbox .. but could be some

Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... virtual/all/dovecot-virtual virtual/combined inthread refs x-mailbox INBOX virtual/combined/dovecot-virtual !INBOX INBOX/Sent INBOX/Drafts all When new mail comes I would assume that both virtual mailboxes should actually see the message

Uhm. combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails from Sent and Drafts. Not sure what your all folder is supposed to do. Aki On 2018-02-18 01:14, Matt Bryant wrote: > Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- > > I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... > > >

> On 13 May 2018, at 14.07, Matt Bryant <matt at the-bryants.net> wrote: > > Sigh ... ok so had if statement in SQL land that appended LAYOUT=fs if Maildir which explains the non-converting folder layout but NOT why the process is not picking up the actual contents of INBOX ... > Try setting imapc_prefix=INBOX instead of imapc_list_prefix. Sami

On 04/12/2018 01:40 AM, p23 power via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - > formally known as hackers lab).  The round table sessions are a great > way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have > scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up > on those

Hi, We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - formally known as hackers lab). The round table sessions are a great way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up on those conversation-topics. We will also setup round tables during the event when there is interest (i.e.

Hi, I have a problem with storing messages into a Spam folder by dovecot. Log says that message was stored into Spam mailbox but when I check there is no message in users's Spam mailbox. cat /var/log/mail.log | grep sieve | grep Spam : *Feb 17 05:09:11 mailserver dovecot: lda(user at domain): sieve: msgid=<b599df639ffa4d20f6e8d2bcff791286 at somedomain.pl>: stored mail into

Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: > Hello! > We're looking into it. Regards, Stephan. > Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) > Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) > > After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following > configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. > > dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) >

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:35 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: >> Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >>> Hello! >>> >> We're looking into it. > Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce > it when I replicate your setup. I created a special test suite that reproduces the problem reliably. This

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >> Hello! >> > We're looking into it. Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce it when I replicate your setup. Regards, Stephan. >> Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) >> Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) >> >> After the update to pigeonhole

Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope

All, According to doco replication gets its list of users to replicate from the iterate query but this doesn't seem to be the case or its just being totally ignored .. Have ldap passbd and sql userdb, with the iterate query in the userdb sql file. -The query itself returns the handful of users I want to replicate BUT if I run the command dovecot replicator status '*' it shows pretty

[1] JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY [2] [3] [4] [5] You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached or LOGIN HERE [6]. FAX DETAILS Caller Id: Received: Type: Number of pages: Reference #: 1-630-226-2563 [7] 2015-02-24 16:40:51 CST Attached in pdf 1 pdx_did4-056267093-45815523543-99 WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN: *

[1] JOIN THE eFax COMMUNITY [2] [3] [4] [5] You have a new eFax message. To view your message, see your fax attached or LOGIN HERE [6]. FAX DETAILS Caller Id: Received: Type: Number of pages: Reference #: 1-314-427-3300 [7] 2015-03-13 05:29:26 CDT Attached in pdf 1 atl_did9-1426242519-18479294585-167 WITH EFAX, DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN: *

Hi, I'm having a slow startup (30") of Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) in windows 8 and windows 10. I've tried it in Windows 7 and it starts correctly (3-5"). Once connection is stablished it goes smoothly. I've tried connecting Remote Desktop with an IP and I've got same behaviour. When I'm starting Remote Desktop from Windows 10 or 8 I get next message in samba