Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Corrupt index files"
2017 Jul 24
0
Corrupt index files
On 21.07.2017 20:47, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> I am running Dovecot IMAP on Linux, on a LizardFS storage cluster with
> Maildir storage. This has worked well for most of the accounts for
> several months.
>
> However in the last couple of weeks we are seeing increasing errors
> regarding corrupted index files. Some of the accounts affected are
> unable to retrieve messages due to
2017 Jul 21
0
Corrupt index files
Am 21.07.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Bruce Guenter:
>
> I am running Dovecot IMAP on Linux, on a LizardFS storage cluster with
> Maildir storage. This has worked well for most of the accounts for
> several months.
>
> However in the last couple of weeks we are seeing increasing errors
> regarding corrupted index files.
you should avoid this
one solution is to use loadbalancers
2017 Aug 01
3
Corrupt index files
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:56:23PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Well, dovecot does not really guarantee access concurrency safety if you access indexes using more than one instance of dovecot at the same time.
Pardon my ignorance, but how does Dovecot handle when an IMAP client
connects multiple times concurrently? Does it not launch multiple
instances?
> Nevertheless, did you try w/o
2017 Jul 24
2
Corrupt index files
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 08:39:36AM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Do you have users accessing the files concurrently from more than one
> dovecot instance at a time?
Yes. Apparently it is fairly common behavior for some IMAP clients to
open up multiple connections to the same mailbox. Some times the
multiple accesses came from different servers (stand alone IMAP client
and a webmail system), but
2011 Nov 04
1
Corrupted transaction log file
Hi,
I'm experiencing a problem I need some pointers to debug.
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.15 and have a client which keeps causing
log-entries like:
Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot: imap (test at aaaone.net): Error: Corrupted
transaction log file /mail/3340444/.TestMails/dovecot.index.log seq 2:
indexid changed 1320419300 -> 1320419441 (sync_offset=0)
Nov 4 15:10:42 mail dovecot:
2018 Aug 08
1
dovecot Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 1013
An email came to several users but one user didn't receive it and we got
'Mail delivery failed' message.
As I see from the log below, there were broken index file.
Then dovecot repaired that index and we got the error:
Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 1013 (mail_index_sync_map):
assertion failed: (map->hdr.indexid == index->indexid || map->hdr.indexid
== 0)
It was
2009 May 04
2
mail_index_sync_map error on 1.1.14
Seen this error a few times from dovecot-1.1.14, Mac OS X, 64-bit
Intel. NFS may have been used.
Panic: IMAP(user): file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 843
(mail_index_sync_map): assertion failed: (map->hdr.indexid == index-
>indexid || map->hdr.indexid == 0)
Two different backtraces to this error are:
0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff87b775ea __kill + 10
1
2015 Sep 21
3
New software based on libvirt
Hello,
I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop.
Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely
without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up
and therefore no wasted resources and no single point of failure.
It's still pretty crude software but will work with some tinkering. Hope
you try it and like it!
For more
2009 Sep 07
2
file->buffer_offset + file->buffer->used == file->sync_offset
I got the following panic on 1.2.3:
Panic: file mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 88 (log_buffer_move_to_memory): assertion failed: (file->buffer_offset + file->buffer->used == file->sync_offset)
It's probably related to the file system holding the indexes being full.
2005 Jan 14
3
Squirrelmail - messages not marked as read
As of test-60 and test-61, running Squirrelmail 1.5.1[cvs] on
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE, messages are not marked as read after they
are read.
If I switch back to test-59, it works normally.
When switching back to test-59, with log_path = /var/log/dovelog
dovelog shows:
dovecot: Jan 14 11:43:38 Error: IMAP(kimc): Corrupted index cache
file /home/kimc/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed
2004 Jul 27
2
Errors with a blackberry
Hi -
We tried to access a dovecot-0.99.10.7 IMAPS server with a Blackberry
7230. The Blackberry was on loan so we don't have much access to it for
testing.
We got the following in our logs:
Jul 27 12:30:27 xserv imap-login: Login: testuser [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Jul 27 12:30:27 xserv imap(testuser): IndexID mismatch for binary tree
file /home/testuser/mail//.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree
Jul 27
2003 Jun 16
2
more newline related errors
Should I be concerned about these errors?
imap(msun): Jun 13 13:21:38 Error: Error indexing mbox file /home/msun/mail/Deleted Messages: LF not found where expected
imap(msun): Jun 13 13:39:08 Error: Corrupted binary tree for index /home/msun/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index: lookup returned index outside range (1 >= 0)
imap(msun): Jun 13 13:44:07 Error: IndexID mismatch for binary tree file
2004 May 23
2
1.0-test11
http://dovecot.org/test/
- Added pop3_mails_keep_recent setting. Currently this only means that
mails won't be moved from new/ to cur/ in maildir. More I/O friendly.
- Fixed \Recent-flag handling and counters to work correctly with
maildir. I think it's finally working right :)
- mbox syncing fixes (but expunging still not implemented)
- some other fixes..
Please try and report what
2012 Mar 27
1
2.1.2 Corrupted squat uidlist
Hi Timo and All,
after upgrading to 2.1.2 i'm getting a lot of these messages:
Error: Corrupted squat uidlist file XXXXXX wrong indexid
I did not have them before.
Ideas?
Luca
2009 Nov 05
2
Seeing "Corrupted transaction log file" error messages.
In V1.1.15 that I fell back to. Again:
# 1.1.15: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: AIX 3 0001378F4C00
listen: *:143
ssl_listen: *:993
disable_plaintext_auth: no
verbose_ssl: yes
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_processes_count: 12
login_max_processes_count: 774
max_mail_processes: 1024
verbose_proctitle: yes
first_valid_uid: 200
2009 Sep 30
3
Some issues in Dovecot 1.2.5 after upgrade from 1.0.15
We upgraded from Dovecot 1.0.15 to 1.2.5 last night, on Solaris 10 using
mboxes, mostly without issues.
However I had to trash the index/cache files (too many folders were
showing corruption issues which is especially bad for Prayer Webmail
".prayer" folders that store preferences; Prayer sees a disconnection as
the folder being missing!).
I've had one imap process panic in mailbox
2017 Oct 10
4
ZFS with SSD ZIL vs XFS
Anyone made some performance comparison between XFS and ZFS with ZIL
on SSD, in gluster environment ?
I've tried to compare both on another SDS (LizardFS) and I haven't
seen any tangible performance improvement.
Is gluster different ?
2007 Nov 06
3
Various uidlist and index errors with 1.1 on NFS
Two nights ago I took a leap and extended my testing of dovecot 1.1 by
replacing 1.0 for the approx 15 users I had on 1.0. At that time I also
for the first time tried dovecot 1.1 in a load balanced 2 server configuration
with indexes on NFS. I was hoping I did this right, using the mail_nfs params
and 1.1 so fchown etc would flush the access cache, but I am getting a number
of messages and
2014 Jan 14
1
panic!
(I will not make a joke about the streets of Carlyle)
Jan 13 19:09:07 mail dovecot: lda(john at example.com): Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 1148 (mail_transaction_log_file_get_highest_modseq_at): assertion failed: (offset <= file->sync_offset)
Jan 13 19:09:08 mail kernel: pid 8435 (dovecot-lda), uid 89: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
Jan 13 19:14:16 mail dovecot: lda(john
2004 May 24
4
1.0-test12
http://dovecot.org/test/
- "Maildir sync: UID < next_uid (446 < 447, file = .." errors should
be fixed
- fixes for detecting changes in uidvalidity and external uidnext
changes
- several fixes and cleanups in index file handling. less code than
before and now changes to index header also go through transaction log.
that should mean that soon I can get mmap_disable = yes