Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms"
2017 Jun 09
0
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
> >> Warning: Transaction log file
> /home/luser/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log
> >> was locked for 95 seconds (rotating while syncing)
>
> Timo recently explained to me it's probably caused by slow I/O or
> processing. This explanation is consistent with my observation that
> the users who get these messages have jumbo mailboxes.
I do know that this
2017 Jun 09
0
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
I was recently asked to upgrade some neolithic aged software (UW-IMAP,
sendmail 8.12.x, apache 1.3, amongst other horrors).
The box is physically remote, so an aggressive "new flush" wasn't an option.
I've been able to upgrade the compiler to gcc-3.4, openssl to 1.0.2k, glibc,
php to something in the 5.4-branch, etc.
I have CLucene working, even.
I know should take a shotgun
2017 Jun 16
1
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
> I've tried changing how I symbolically linked the mailboxes, i.e.,
> creating a sub-directory that is symlinked into the user's mail/
> directory versus symbolically linking the mbox files themselves, etc.
> No dice. Permissions are fine. I've even resorted to changing the
> index locking strategy, to no avail.
I've tested my setup by symlinking both folders and
2017 Jun 09
1
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
> I do know that this little box of horrors has 200-300MB mbox INBOXes on an
> ext3 filesystem formatted in 2005. I am very nervous about converting them to
> Maildir at this point.
Fortunately, it just involves reformatting the data and a little
reconmfiguration of dovcot. If you can find the tool and disk space,
it's well worth doing. Of course, when running a proverbial
2017 Jun 09
2
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
On 06/09/2017 05:13 PM, M. Balridge wrote:
> I do know that this little box of horrors has 200-300MB mbox INBOXes on an
> ext3 filesystem formatted in 2005. I am very nervous about converting them to
> Maildir at this point. If I could get someone (or something) to the site and
> replace it with something much more suitable, I could have these people join
> the 21st Century.
I
2017 Jun 11
0
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
David "Show Me The Vintage!" McGuire wrote:
> I for one am finding this thread extremely entertaining. I have to
> wonder how you'd sound if you came across a machine that was actually
> OLD. ;)
Well, I am fond of "old" hardware, which may still be on the wrong side of the
New/Old divide for some of you: DECSYSTEM-20s and VAX 11/780s were the first
2017 Jun 13
1
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
On 12 Jun 2017, at 2.09, M. Balridge <dovecot at r.paypc.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it's just doing a lot of work on the mbox file itself
>> (reading/writing/rewriting). Would be nice of course if it logged
>> more information, but mbox format is a bit too legacy to spend
>> much time on improving.
>
> I suspect the (heavy) use of procmail on Herr
2017 Jun 08
2
v2.2.30.1 released
>
> We have identified a bug in auth process, and are working with a fix.
>
It works for me in 2.2.30-2
--
Angel L. Mateo Mart?nez
Secci?n de Telem?tica
?rea de Tecnolog?as de la Informaci?n
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 868888337
2017 Jun 12
0
Minor patches for builds against ancient platforms
> On that note, has anyone written a tool that "harmonises" users mail
> directories' permissions - ideally reading the dovecot configuration to assess
> where *THE* mail directories are actually used by dovecot?
doveadm user $user
which will supply the second half: it will spit out the UID, GID, home
and mail directories of a user as specified by dovecot's
2009 Jul 22
3
Newbie: unable to access mailbox more than once
Hello,
I'm using dovecot as a mail relay so that I can back up my providers
IMAP mail locally. I'm impressed how easy this was to set up, but I'm
having a quirk that I would like help with, if possible.
There are many weak links in my set-up chain, if you will, but I think
I've narrowed the problem. I'll describe my set-up anyway. I'm running
dovecot 1.1.4 on ubuntu
2004 Dec 29
1
User authentication to AD200X, need local users?
I am trying to get user authentication in a 200X AD to have domain
users see the samba shares (RH ES3, samba 3.0.9-1).
I can see the shares, but when I try to access any of the shares, I
get prompted for a username and password and this is what shows up in
the log.winbindd file
-------------------
[2004/12/29 08:17:37, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'robl' does
2006 Mar 01
2
Method Calling Problems
Hi all! I am attemping to call a method inside of my
LeviUserController named show_userland from my
LeviInterfaceController class. No matter how I do it,
I keep getting some type of error. If I make the method
a class method, then my render_partial inside of
show_userland can''t be found. If i call it using
@luser = LeviUserController.new;
@luser.show_userland;
I get an error with a nil
2008 Sep 24
2
[Dovecot 1.1.3] Strange problem with attachment download
Hello everyone,
I am testing Dovecot 1.1.3 at the moment to see if I can migrate from
UW-Imap(mbox) to Dovecot(maildir). Because I dont' want to influence the
production server I installed Dovecot on an ununsed computer with some
dummy-testusers using ssl and maildir. Installation was without any
problems and everything works fine with one exception: I cannot download
some attachments.
2019 Jun 14
2
LMTP doesn't save to +mailbox
Since switching to lmtp in dovecot, mail to user+mailboix at example.com does not get saved in ?.mailbox? as it did with LDA, instead it gets saved into the INBOX. If it matters, these are users who do NOT have a ~/.active_sieve file. I could understand (though it would bene a bit annoying) if the save overrode this mechanism.
I did add lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes in the protocol lmtp
2011 Jul 22
1
Bug report v2.0.13 - CentOS x86_64 - NFS - mbox
Greetings to all.
It's my first post to the list. We just completed a migration from qpopper to dovecot
for our IMAP and POP3 services. We have a rather large mail environment
(we are the biggest provider in Greece).
So, here are the details:
- Keep getting errors like these in our production environment
Jul 22 00:18:21 pop01 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): child 4078 killed with
2007 Sep 28
2
dovecot 1.05 err: Reason Given: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file
> ERROR:
> ERROR: Could not complete request.
> Query: SELECT "Mailbox"
> Reason Given: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file
removing the () from the first line of the mbox fixed it.
The line:
From luser at hotmail.com () Mon Jun 25 11:20:33 2007
Is this a valid line?
--
Ken Anderson
Pacific.Net
2001 Feb 12
0
Samba and password protected directories
Hello, I have Win98 clients that need
to connect "securely" to directories on Linux boxes.
In smb.conf, I have added these home directories:
[Luser Dir]
comment = dir
public = no
browseable = yes
writable = yes
path = /home/luser
Accounts have been created in the appropriate directories with
proper accessibility, this includes passwords. This was done
with "useradd
2014 Jan 22
1
Advice/directions to users of Syslinux
In message <BLU0-SMTP218A5F5400BB0FCA0312DC28BA70 at phx.gbl>, Ady wrote:
>By adding technical details, it makes it harder for a non-technical
>user to follow, and such user will probably go away looking for a
>simpler answer.
Yes.
>If a user doesn't know what "create a new DOS partition table" means,
>there are many ways to find out, including a web
2020 Jan 11
2
Why are the arguments supplied for the command run through ssh interpreted by shell before they are passed to the command on the server side?
On 2020-01-11 08:57, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> If you wish for no local expansion, quote locally, such as:
>
> ssh -l luser remotehost '
> command1
> command2
> ?
> '
This didn't work for me because single quotes only prevent local
expansion. The string is expanded on the remote host.
Yuri
2004 Aug 30
3
sig11 with test36/37 on some emails
Sometimes I'll get an email from a luser which will cause the POP3 daemon to
sig11. The email "appears" to be legal. The sig11s only happen on specific
emails, and once I remove the emails from the server, the rest can be
downloaded. I gzipped the email, and its at
http://theapt.org/bogusemail.gz. While this example is international spam,
the sig11s happen with real emails too.