similar to: v2.2.30 released

Timo wrote: >>> + If dovecot.index.cache corruption is detected, reset only the one >>> corrupted mail instead of the whole file. >> >> Is this a big performance win? I still have users with jumbo mailboxes >> who insist on direct mailbox file access using procmail or mail readers, >> which trigger index rebuilds when dovecot accesses them. > >

Thanks Joseph, Aki, but something missing from upgrade document, where does the dh param file go? I located ssl-parameters.dat so I will put it there. Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: > >> However, recent advances make this condition obsolete [*] and not >> really safer, so a much faster way to generate a DH key is

Timo wrote: >> (Lots of this ...) >> May 26 15:22:50 server dovecot: pop3(user): Warning: Transaction log file /{cachedir}/dovecot.index.log was locked for 43 seconds (rotating while syncing) >> May 27 16:57:18 server dovecot: imap(user): Warning: Transaction log file /{cachedir}/dovecot.index.log was locked for 105 seconds (Mailbox was synchronized) > > Not really an

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Which mail client on iOS? Sorry, maybe not iOS, but definitely MacOSX Mail app. Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

Kevin writes: > Appreciate if you could help with this. I have been trying to address this > "slow search" issue for a while with very limited success(I was trying to > implement FTS also), so I will appreciate if you could support. When I'm stumped, one of the diagnostic tools I use is process tracing. Connect via IMAP, in another window/session process trace the IMAP

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Do I need to make a fresh dh.pem? The upgrade doc tells how to convert >> ssl-parameters.dat but how to make a new one? > > ... or you can make a fresh one using openssl > gendh 4096 > dh.pem This also works openssl dhparam -out dh.pem 4096 > Note that this will require quite a lot of entropy, so you should > probably

On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: >> At the expense of sounding stupid, could you please expound on the >> sequence? :) If you want the nitty details (Starting at bottom of page 18) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2831 Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

A mail user reported that he filled up his INBOX (despite reminders he was approaching his filesystem quota), and furthermore, he could not fix the situation because he couldn't expunge message he marked for deletion. The dovecot logs revealed the cause dovecot: imap(user): Error: open(/var/mail/user.lock) failed: Disc quota exceeded This created an impasse where a user cannot free

Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >> I use acme.sh for all of my LetsEncrypt certs (web & mail), it is >> written in pure shell script, so no python dependencies. >> https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh > > Thanks - I might look at that, but as Ralph mentions in his reply - > Let's encrypt certs are only for three months - never ending circus.

"Scott W. Sander" writes: > I have noticed that the name of my private server running dovecot appears > in email headers rather than the public-friendly name of my server. Which headers are you taking about? If you're talking about Received: headers, that's usually inserted by your MTA, not dovecot. Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

And here is mine. All dates are todays! # doveadm -f tab fetch -u test at example.org "uid date.saved" mailbox Trash uid date.saved 6829 2018-07-18 06:04:50 6830 2018-07-18 11:10:13 6831 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6832 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6833 2018-07-18 08:22:55 6834 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6835 2018-07-18 08:47:10 6836 2018-07-18 09:12:11 6837 2018-07-18 09:53:31 6838 2018-07-18 11:03:31 SNIP a

Timo announced: > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.27.tar.gz.sig > > Note that the download URLs are now https with a certificate from Let's Encrypt. wget complained about ERROR: certificate common name `wiki.dovecot.org' doesn't match requested host name `dovecot.org'. and indeed, the

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Marc Roos wrote: > When changing in a working setup sendmail.mc > > From this > MAILER(smtp)dnl > MAILER(procmail)dnl > > To this > FEATURE(`local_lmtp',`[IPC]',`FILE /var/run/dovecot/lmtp')dnl > MAILER(local)dnl > > I am getting these errors '501 5.6.0 Data format error' and ' > Unrecognized host name'. > ...

After setting imap_hibernate_timeout to 60s, I could not find any hibernated connections after a few hours. I tested hibernation and made an observation: IDLE'd imap sessions only hibernate if they don't have a mailbox SELECT'd, otherwise they never hibernate. Is this the way it's supposed to work? Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

"M. Balridge" <dovecot at r.paypc.com> writes: > I assume it's a rarely seen issue because few Dovecot users compile the > software in caves on computers powered by horse-pulled generator > wheels. I resemble that remark. >> Warning: Transaction log file /home/luser/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log >> was locked for 95 seconds (rotating while syncing)

Any guess at what would cause this? Feb 7 21:20:53 server dovecot: imap(user): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs-iter.c: line 447 (fs_list_get_roots): assertion failed: (full_fs_access) (Sorry, no core dump) According to my logs, this user couldn't start an IMAP session for a 2 hour stretch for hundreds of connections. Then the problem seemed to have went away. I logged back as that

> Old server: > * Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS > * Dovecot 2.1.13 > * Maildir++ > * Local auth via passwd/shadow files > > New server: > * Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 > * Dovecot 2.2.13 > * Maildir++ > * Quotas enabled > * LDAP > > Basically what's happening is that users are seeing large delays when > navigating between different IMAP folders. So, for example, user

Joseph Ward writes: > I'm aware of at least a couple of fallback options: > ??? -have a self-signed cert for replication and use the Let's Encrypt > one for IMAP/POP > ??? - create firewall rules allowing them to connect to each other over > the public internet so that it can validate the proper cert > ? > These are both much less palatable than simply disabling the

"Davide Marchi" <danjde at msw.it> writes: >> UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch. Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used it to export some of my users' mailboxes to Gmail or other remote mail servers, and I could almost cut&paste the messages faster. Like Aki

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph