similar to: Users home path inside a sieve script

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Users home path inside a sieve script"

2020 Apr 22
2
Seive + Spamprobe terminates with signal 6
Ubuntu 20.04, Dovecot 2.3.7.2, SpamProbe v1.4d. For the past weeks my sieve filters that call spamprobe have been crashing out for some users. I have a dozen similar server setups and this is not happening on any of the other servers and it was working just fine for a year up until recently. This particular server is quite busy. There is plenty of disk space and inode usage is about 2.5%.
2020 Jun 13
2
Send SPF SoftFails to Junk
Hello Dovecot gurus, I've set up SPF checking on my postfix gateway and have confirmed that messages from domains set with hard fails that don't come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the
2017 Mar 29
1
Using SpamProbe via only sieve scripts
FWIW this took me days to get right, and still needs tinkering, but it might make for a good starting point for anyone else needing something similar (ie; I don't use or need the overhead of spamassassin or rspamd). https://gist.github.com/markc/eeeb66ce30ea805af62631656cf86c4d Any comments or corrections on that page would be appreciated.
2020 May 31
5
I can no longer use TLS for Windows7 and Outlook
I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac clients through disabling ports 993/995 with TLS enabled back to ports 143/110 without SSL or they could not pick up email. Thunderbird users (ie; me) were unaffected. Could anyone share a set of port 993/995 SSL
2020 Jul 07
3
Outlook vs Thunderbird
On 06 Jul 2020, at 20:30, Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > you could try disabling SSL/STARTTLS on port 143. What? I?ve never seen SSL/StARTTLS on port 143,a dn I doubt that would work? -- Rumour is information distilled so finely that it can filter through anything. It does not need doors and windows -- sometimes it does not need people. It can exist free and wild, running
2020 Jul 15
2
Outlook vs Thunderbird
On Tue Jul 07 2020 02:07:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Really, really bad idea. You just
2016 Dec 17
2
Domains on different IPs
I want to supply separate Letsencrypt certificates for each virtual domain and seeing that SNI does not work I need to allocate separate IPs. Could anyone give some pointers, or keywords to search for, on... a) how to make dovecot listen for different domains on different IPs? b) how to configure separate SSL certs for each of these IPs?
2020 Jul 07
2
Outlook vs Thunderbird
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:45:06AM +0300, Sami Ketola wrote: > > > > On 7. Jul 2020, at 0.48, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move > > their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. > > Not on Outlook. > > > > Any
2018 Sep 19
1
Sieve and output variable for execute
I'm trying to get blow Sieve filter to work require ["fileinto", "imap4flags", "mailbox", "body", "envelope", "vnd.dovecot.pipe", "variables", "vnd.dovecot.execute"]; if envelope :matches "To" "*@*" { set "recipient" "${0}"; set "user" "${1}"; set
2020 May 31
0
I can no longer use TLS for Windows7 and Outlook
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 31/05/2020 07:36 Mark Constable <<a href="mailto:markc@renta.net">markc@renta.net</a>> wrote: </div> <div> <br>
2020 May 31
1
I can no longer use TLS for Windows7 and Outlook
On 5/31/20 11:54 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 31/05/2020 07:36 Mark Constable <markc at renta.net >> <mailto:markc at renta.net>> wrote: >> >> >> I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. >> >> A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since >> then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac
2007 Jan 31
1
Q on configuring shared mboxes
Hello! I have the following three types of mailboxes on my server: 1) Regular user mail /var/mail/<user> in mbox format 2) Suspected spam in /var/tmp/spamprobe in mbox format 3) Archived mailing list in /home/mks/mksarch in mbox format I want the 1) to be only accessible to the respective <user>, obviously (POP3 and/or IMAP4). I wanted the 2) to be accessible to all users --
2014 May 09
3
v2.2.13.rc1 vs. Pigeonhole
Server: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit There seems to be an incompatibility when compiling Pigeonhole against Dovecot v2.2.13.rc1. # make check with Pigeonhole throws up the following error message: <snip> Test case: ./tests/extensions/editheader/addheader.svtest: 1: Test 'Addheader - first' SUCCEEDED 2: Test 'Addheader - last' SUCCEEDED 3: Test 'Addheader - framed'
2005 Aug 28
2
Feature Request - wild idea - folders for executing programs
Timo, I have a wild idea for a feature that is somewhat unusual, would be very powerful, and easy to implement. What I want is ... Special folders that when someone drags a message into them - it pipes the message into a program. The reason I want this is - for example - reporting of spam. Suppose you want everyone to have a spam-missed folder so that if a spam gets through then the user
2019 Jun 10
2
Sieve to strip html from multipart messages
Is is possible (I?m sure it is, so how) to strip multipart messages that are HTML and text of the HTML portion and leave the bare text message without also stripping other parts (like images or attached files). Or also to take messages that are only HTML and strip the HTML and replace it with a plain text version? I used to do this a long time ago with procmail and lynx, but it was never
2018 Feb 16
4
Sieve to process list mail based on list-ID
Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. Basically, what I do now in procmail is 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or List-post/List-owner if no ID) 2. check against a list of
2018 Mar 03
2
pigeonhole 0.4.22 with sieve_before script crashes
Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope
2023 Jan 27
2
sieve_extprograms plugin calling bash script
I receive an email a few times a week containing a URL for a live stream which starts within a minute after receiving the email. I want to automate capturing the whole stream. I've been trying to write a sieve script which uses the sieve extprograms plugin to call a bash script that parses the URL from the email and passes it to a capture program. So far I've had no luck getting the bash
2020 May 13
5
Sieve addheader directive works only partially
Hi all, I want to add a custom header to incoming emails from a particular sender. This is what my user Sieve script looks like: require ?editheader?; if address :is "From? ?special-sender at example.com? { addheader ?X-My-Custom-Header? ?Header Value"; } I have enabled the editheader extension in my Dovecot configuration: plugin { ? sieve_extensions = +editheader }
2019 Nov 08
2
Register Dataflow Analysis on X86
I came across this thread from a couple years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/119346.html Has there been any progress on RDF for X86? Or is there some other preferred alternative for performing reachability analysis after register allocation? Thanks, Scott Constable -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: