similar to: Help

Dear Team I have faced issue with email downloading in the email client by using pop3 SSL port 995 in dovecot v2.1.17 for outlook client 2016 on production environment. As per my troubleshooting on my test environment, I have upgraded dovecot version v2.2.28, and changed paramer "ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048" and "verbose_ssl = yes", The issue seems to be resolved in

Dear Team, I'm getting issue with port 995 by using Microsoft Outlook 2016 only. The error on Microsoft Outlook showing "Your server does not support the connection encryption type. Try changing the encryption method". The error is only who is using Microsoft outlook2016. Kindly help. Thanks and Regards, Bhushan Bhosale

Dear Team, I'm facing issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 only for outlook2016. It's working fine with dovecot v2.2.28 on test environment. Is the dovecot v2.2.28 is stable released? I can? upgrade the version from v2.1.17 to v2.2.28 on production if its stable version. Kindly confirm and provide the proper solution. Thanks and Regards, Bhushan Previous Mail:==========I have faced

> What can i do to resolve this issue in dovecot v2.1.17 in Production environment? Kindly help Why don't you upgrade production and modify the settings as you did in test? Matt Pallissard On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:20 +0000, Bhushan Bhosale wrote: > Dear Team > > I have faced issue with email downloading in the email client by using pop3 SSL port 995 in dovecot v2.1.17 for

Hello, I have worked on LLVM for my project related to Register Allocation. Bernhard Scholz suggested that Implementing Branch and Bound Heuristic for Reduce N in PBQP register Allocation for LLVM would be to great project to work on. I'm looking forward to implement it in LLVM system. How should i get start about it ? I would also like to know about some of the other projects in LLVM.

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:29AM +0000, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 5:53 AM > > To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2 at marvell.com> > > Cc: jean-philippe at linaro.org; joro at 8bytes.org; jasowang at redhat.com; > > virtualization at

Hi, I am trying to use speex for online speech compression in my application code. I wanted to know the bits per sample for 8khz sampling rate. Presently i am using 16 bits/ sample, is it alright? -- Bhushan

Hi list, I recently tried to backup mailboxes from an older server machine to a new one in order to move the service to the new machine. Both machines are in the same LAN, I used this command: dsync -R -u username backup ssh -i .ssh/id_rsa username at 192.168.1.11 /opt/local/bin/dsync and I get this error: dsync-local(dz): Error: Invalid server handshake: dsync-server 2 dsync-remote(dz):

On 21.04.2017 12:29, Bhushan Bhosale wrote: > Dear Team, > > I'm facing issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 only for outlook2016. It's working fine with dovecot v2.2.28 on test environment. > Is the dovecot v2.2.28 is stable released? I can upgrade the version from v2.1.17 to v2.2.28 on production if its stable version. > Kindly confirm and provide the proper solution.

On 2020-04-01 12:38 pm, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > Different endpoint can support different page size, probe > endpoint if it supports specific page size otherwise use > global page sizes. > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2 at marvell.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h |

Hello everyone, in http://reviews.llvm.org/D7696 bhushan added a mips64 UnwindAssembly plugin (a plugin that looks at assembly code to find out how to unwind the stack frame). Since I was about to write such a plugin (though for mips32) myself, I used it as a starting point for a slightly different implementation [1], replacing hard coded instruction encodings by calls to the LLVM disassembler.

Hi all, anyone having any problems with restarting the director? Every time I bring down 1 of the director servers, reboot it, or just restart it for whatever reason, im seeing all kinds of problems. Dovecot generally always gives me this error: Jan 20 22:49:55 imapdirector3 dovecot: director: Error: Director 194.109.26.173:444/right disconnected before handshake finished It seems the directors

# HG changeset patch # User Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <Carl-Daniel.Hailfinger@inf.h-brs.de> # Date 1474903734 -7200 # Mon Sep 26 17:28:54 2016 +0200 # Node ID dbd1ea0a401cedcfa426097a289d852971b14f1e # Parent d7d5078d08c711032837dcac79a4450226ec2ce5 nbdkit: Fix flags in old-style connection diff -r d7d5078d08c7 -r dbd1ea0a401c src/connections.c --- a/src/connections.c Sun Sep 25 05:04:02

When I do a NFS mount and do a ls I get: [root at ovirt share]# ls ls: reading directory .: Too many levels of symbolic links [root at ovirt share]# ls -fl ls: reading directory .: Too many levels of symbolic links total 3636 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 16384 Jun 21 19:34 . dr-xr-xr-x. 21 root root 4096 Jun 21 19:29 .. drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 16384 Jun 21 19:34 . dr-xr-xr-x. 21 root root 4096

Commit 41d351f29528 ("drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait") converted from ttm_bo_wait_ctx() to dma_resv_wait_timeout(). However, dma_resv_wait_timeout() returns greater than zero on success as opposed to ttm_bo_wait_ctx(). As a result, relocs will fail and log errors even when it was a success. Change the return code handling to match that of nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(), which was

Marcus, Can you share server-side gluster peer probe and client-side mount command-lines. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Marcus Peders?n <marcus.pedersen at slu.se> wrote: > Hi all! > > I have setup a replicated/distributed gluster cluster 2 x (2 + 1). > > Centos 7 and gluster version 3.12.6 on server. > > All machines have two network interfaces and connected to

Hello, I'm trying to set up a SAMBA server serving a GlusterFS volume. Everything works fine if I locally mount the GlusterFS volume (`mount -t glusterfs ...`) and then serve the mounted FS through SAMBA, but the performance is slower by a 2x/3x compared to a SAMBA server with a local ext4 filesystem. I gather that SAMBA vfs_glusterfs module can give better performance. However, as soon as I

Dear sir, could you provide me the link for getting System Requirements for SAMBA file server thanks, Bhushan

Hi, I am trying to find information about the performance of speex on various processors, platforms and operating systems. If anyone has this information about the benchmarking for speex plz share the same. Thanks Bhushan

Hi all! I have setup a replicated/distributed gluster cluster 2 x (2 + 1). Centos 7 and gluster version 3.12.6 on server. All machines have two network interfaces and connected to two different networks, 10.10.0.0/16 (with hostnames in /etc/hosts, gluster version 3.12.6) 192.168.67.0/24 (with ldap, gluster version 3.13.1) Gluster cluster was created on the 10.10.0.0/16 net, gluster peer