similar to: Dovecot 2.2.27 proxy - enforcing per client IP connection limits

Sami Ketola writes: >> Can anyone with Solr installed confirm/refute this: does installing >> Solr keep iOS clients from roofing the connection count? > > I doubt it, but since IMAP SEARCH goes all the way down to the backends > mail_max_userip_connections can be used to limit the number of > connections. Understood -- that's the current situation I'm in now.

On 16 Mar 2017, at 0.14, Adi Pircalabu <adi at ddns.com.au> wrote: > > I thought this might be the case. Is there any solution to enforce this on the proxy? If not, will a feature request be considered anytime soon? I see the proxies as the first line of defense against IMAP "abuse" and I think it's consistent having the same configurable option available on both

Thanks, I thought this might be the case. Is there any solution to enforce this on the proxy? If not, will a feature request be considered anytime soon? I see the proxies as the first line of defense against IMAP "abuse" and I think it's consistent having the same configurable option available on both backends and the proxies. --- Adi Pircalabu On 14-03-2017 20:17, Sami Ketola

Quick follow-up: updated the proxies to 2.2.28, but I still couldn't find a way to limit the inbound IMAP connections per IP & username. I know "mail_max_userip_connections" limit works for the mail stores, but it doesn't seem to have any effect on the proxies. I'm using a mix of Dovecot & Courier-IMAP servers as backends. Basically I need to find a way to enforce

Hi, mail_max_userip_connections is only enforced at the backend level. The setting has no effect on proxy. If you want to force the limit then you can only do it in the backend. Sami > On 9 Mar 2017, at 12.05, Adi Pircalabu <adi at ddns.com.au> wrote: > > Quick follow-up: updated the proxies to 2.2.28, but I still couldn't find a way to limit the inbound IMAP connections per

Hi, Trying to keep abusive/buggy IMAP clients at bay on a number of Dovecot proxy servers, I've reconfigured them to use "mail_max_userip_connections = 50" in the "protocol imap" section, followed by restarting Dovecot. Yet, I'm still seeing 160+ established connections from a single IP address for the same email account. Am I missing anything? # 2.2.27

We are currently implementing the backends for other solvers (you can follow the progress here: https://github.com/mikhailramalho/clang). So far we got Boolector, MathSAT and Yices ready. CVC4 should be done soon. When used to refute bugs, they all give roughly the same results: a ~5% speedup if there are refuted bugs or a ~5% slowdown if no bug is refuted. I've only tried to analyze one

Hi there. I’m trying to use LibFuzzer on OSX and face some issues: I checked out LibFuzzer documentation[1] and managed to proceed until the final step of the first example. Now I see linker errors related to dfsan, dfsan’s documentation[2] states explicitly “DataFlowSanitizer is a work in progress, currently under development for x86_64 Linux.”. Does it mean that LibFuzzer available only on

Hi Ben, do you know if the smallfile benchmark also does interleaved getdents() and lstat, which is what I found as being the key difference that creates the performance gap (further down this thread)? Also, wouldn't `--threads 8` change the performance numbers by factor 8 versus the plain `ls` and `rsync` that I did? Would you mind running those commands directly/plainly on your cluster to

On Jul 27, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB wrote: > ACE issued following PR: > http://www.ace.nl/news/aces-cosy-compiler-framework-outperforms-llvm-arm9-processor > Weird that they don't give any number and use ARM 9, do they mean cortex-a9 ? It's impossible to say. This sort of marketing statement is impossible to refute, because there are no details. Who knows whether

I wonder if anyone could send me a pointer to technical specs and pricing information. I got a mail today from an acquaintence that contains what I believe is some serious misinformation, referring to the 7960 as their new portable 802.11b SIP phone. A quick search of eBay would seem to refute that. I hope this is an OK question to ask. . . Thx. b.

Hi, in src/lib-smtp/smtp-address.c line 759 the localpart is compared with null_strcmp, which does not ignore the case. While this is the correct behavior (according to the RFC) it causes problems in real life. In my case the vacation notices are not sent, if someone writes to First.Last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de because :addresses contains (only) first.last at ruhr-uni-bochum.de. Regards,

I found some ancillary information that seems to indicate that there is a driver that will allow a D-Link DGE-550SX Gigabit fiber NIC to work under FreeBSD 4.x. Can anyone confirm or refute this, or provide additional information? If the NIC is not supported, is there a recommendation for a gigabit fiber NIC that works well under 4.8? Thanks, Steve

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here's an update for those of you struggling to get Samba working in an AD domain environment. ~ Summary: in securirty = ads, clients can browse to the ~ Samba member server via IP but not by name (either netbios ~ or DNS). Kinit and wbinfo -t all work as expected. The apparent reason for this is that the 2k client uses NTLMSSP when you

See http://llvm.org/PR19289 for lots of details. It had already been reported before but I had missed it and so had most others. =[ I'm pretty sure this breaks every 32-bit debian based Linux distro. I've asked David Majnemer to try to confirm or refute that. If it does impact every 32-bit debian based Linux distro, I think this should be a release blocker sad as I am to say it. CC-ing

> optimizing EH codepaths is not usually performance critical. >> Leaving aside the rest of the thread, I feel the need to refute this point in isolation. I've found that optimizing (usually simplifying and eliminating) exception paths ends up being *extremely* important for my workloads. Failing to optimize exception paths sufficiently tends to indirectly hurt things like inlining

I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work - the rest of my colleagues use SAS exclusively. Today, one of them made the assertion that he believes the numerical algorithms in SAS are superior to those in Splus and R -- ie, optimization routines are faster in SAS, the SAS Institute has teams of excellent numerical

r247321 refactors the code so that it should build on Mac. I haven't actually tested it on Mac -- so please help me and send follow up patches if needed. check-fuzzer will still fail because some of the libFuzzer tests require dfsan. I'd use some help from someone with a Mac to modify lib/Fuzzer/test/CMakeLists.txt so that it does not run dfsan-dependent tests on Mac. Thanks, --kcc On

Greetings, I have "inherited" a cDNA macroarray dataset that is structured as follows. Three different stressors were tested. For each stressor, there are two treatments (control and stressed). For each treatment, two biological replicates exist, and these are paired (i.e., there is a stressed array for colony A and a control array from this same colony). For one of these samples,

Hello, even though Timo seems to be hibernating (it's not _that_ cold in ole Suomi ;) I'd like to beg for a feature that would be very much appreciated over here. If something like this is already present and eluded my thorough archive and doc searches, feel free to smack me and then point me to the right direction. Feature request: More extensive session information and statistics in