similar to: How to dsync mdbox compressed to maildir uncompressed

Hello list, im am trying to migrate customer mails via dsync from an old dovecot 1.1 setup to an new installed dovecot 2.2.25 setup with mdbox. Upgrading the old dovecot 1.1 to 2.2 with Maildir isnt an problem and the replication to the new setup works well too. The only problem now is, that the POP3 UIDL are completely wrong on the target setup. Im using for Maildir pop3_uidl_format = %f With

Hello list, is there an way to disable the deflate compression ( imap_zlib ) in the rawlog files, e.g. via postlogin script when dovecot.rawlog folder exists ? Rawlog shown at the moment like: 1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE

Hello, we are using doveadm sync to export mdbox to maildir format, so we can use an external tool to convert into an pst file. Since we have enabled zlib compression doveadm sync always exports the maildir gzip compressed. Are there any ways to prevent the doveadm sync to export the maildir compressed ? Have tried this: doveadm -o "maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no" sync -u imap at

Hi Thomas, this doesnt work: doveadm -o plugin/quota= -o plugin/zlib_save= backup -u imap at test.de maildir:~/Maildir file Maildir/cur/1487752497.M128284P11684.mail,S=7691,W=7887:2,S Maildir/cur/1487752497.M128284P11684.mail,S=7691,W=7887:2,S: gzip compressed data, from Unix Regards, Daniel

Hi Thomas, thank you for your help. This is very strange that it wont work here. can you doveconf -n the relevant parts especially mail_plugins= and plugin { } i think i have misconfigured something :( Regards, Daniel

On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 11:03 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/mallopt.3.html also talks about > various dynamic thresholds for growing and shrinking the heap. My guess > is that we are bouncing up and down over some threshold with every other > reboot. IOW I'm not overly concerned with this apparent bi-modality, so long as the amount isn't

In case the Linux guest has no compressed linux kernel (vmlinuz), fallback to uncompressed ones (vmlinux). Reported by: Laurent Vivier. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 3015c0fca..e485cf495 100644 --- a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml +++ b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml @@ -144,6 +144,9 @@ and

Martin Kos wrote: > Hi > > i have seen that the dbPowerAmp ripping and encoding software supports a > new so-called "FLAC uncompressed" format, e.g. > > http://www.audiostream.com/content/dbpoweramps-flac-lossless-uncompressed-wish-come-true Wow, check this comment:

Hello, Is it possible to encode wav file to uncompressed flac file? Regards, Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20131202/366556ee/attachment.htm

Maciej M?czy?ski wrote: > File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and > metadata in one file. But FLAC is lossless! When you convert a WAV to FLAC, you get a file where the decoded audio data is exactly the same as in the WAV file. Why would you want a larger file that is exactly the same as the compressed file? Anyway, like I hinted in my previous email, WAV

There is no quality difference between FLAC variations - compressed or uncompressed (unless you force a 24-bit audio file into a 16-bit FLAC, but that may not even be possible). The only thing that varies with FLAC is the size of the file. There are many ways to store the same data, some more efficient than others. FLAC ensures that the exact same audio samples will reach your playback

Moved off OggYUV thread as this is off-topic for it.. On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:51:51PM +0800, illiminable wrote: > > > >Um, data packets consist of a 32-bit header followed by PCM data. Where > >did you get the idea that "sync" data was in the packet? > > That's what the first 32 bits of "header" are. Um, no, the first 32 bits of the header is

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:31:29AM -0800, Ralph Giles wrote: > > > > I am open to eliminating it, if it can be shown that the act of reading or > > skipping this data complicates implementation or makes it less efficient, > > however, the decidion to do so should include several people (Monty, Ralph, etc) > > who haven't joined this discussion yet. > >

Solar flares and aliens, mostly. Also I was joking to demonstrate the absurdity. I verified Ben's hypothesis, it is using VERBATIM. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Mark Rudholm <mark at rudholm.com> wrote: > Can you explain exactly how transferring a WAV file from one drive to > another results in degradation of audio quality? > > And what are the "inherent defects of

On 3/9/2012 at 3:56 PM Vladimiro Macedo wrote: |What dbPowerAmp does is encapsulate the wav file into a FLAC container |without actually compressing it. I guess it can be a bit arguable if you |can technically call it a FLAC file :) |It's like using "Store" mode in RAR, for instance. The idea behing this |"uncompressed FLAC" is to give the FLAC tagging abilities to

On 3/11/2012 at 1:35 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote: |On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mike. <the.lists at mgm51.com> wrote: |>??Some people feel that the |> extra CPU power required to de-compress a FLAC file causes the timing |> issues in the audio samples going to the DAC. | |This isn't something you have to "feel", it's something you could |_measure_??? far more

Is there any uncompressed webcam video footage I can test theora with? tom_a_sparks Light travels faster then sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak

Is there any place in the Vorbis header information to determine the total uncompressed size of PCM data without having to decompress the file?

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mike. <the.lists at mgm51.com> wrote: >?Some people feel that the > extra CPU power required to de-compress a FLAC file causes the timing > issues in the audio samples going to the DAC. This isn't something you have to "feel", it's something you could _measure_? far more precisely than anyone could hope to hear. To whatever

Thanks Silvia for your response :-) It's good to get constructive discussion on this, and I've been hoping to have exactly this kind of criticism re: OggPCM for some time. On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:21:04PM +1100, Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au wrote: > > Data pages are identified to be part of a logical bitstream through their > serial number, so don't need any additional