similar to: Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10"

2017 Feb 06
2
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hello, thank You, this solution worked too. But had to do same thing for those files: test-http-client-errors.c:388 test-http-client-errors.c:484 test-http-client-errors.c:556 test-http-client-errors.c:636 test-http-server-errors.c:594 main.c:63 director.c:1445 director.c:1448 imap-client.c:253 director.c:1445 director.c:1448 mail-stats.c:56 Is this an old compiler issue or something else?
2017 Feb 03
2
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hi, thank You for a reply, compiling with Solaris Studio 12.5 solved this case. Martin Preen <preen at informatik.uni-freiburg.de> ra??: > Hello, > I don't have problems building 2.2.27 on Solaris 10 > (using Sun Workshop compiler 5.11). > > The configuration is the same as your. > Maybe a compiler/version problem on your system ? > > Regards, > Martin >
2017 Oct 30
1
LDAP authentication and shadowExpire
Hi, I am trying to configure Dovecot (2.2.27) with LDAP passdb, specifically with authentication binds (https://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP/AuthBinds). Atribute shadowExpire has a unix time stamp value. Is there a way to write pass_filter like shadowExpire<ToDay? Or maybe there is better way to implement password expiration in Dovecot? -- Pagarbiai Mantas Gegu?is VU
2018 Jan 16
1
Replication configuration
Hello, I am trying to configure replication between two servers, for only specified virtual users, without success of course :) I am using LDAP for accounting. I have tried to pass a file with list like this: replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U -F /etc/dovecot/list I have even tried to specify users with LDAP filter: iterate_filter = (|(uid=user1)(uid=user2)) both without
2017 Feb 03
0
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hello, I don't have problems building 2.2.27 on Solaris 10 (using Sun Workshop compiler 5.11). The configuration is the same as your. Maybe a compiler/version problem on your system ? Regards, Martin Mantas Gegu?is wrote: > Hello, > > I am tying to compile Dovecot 2.2.27 on Solaris 10, and I get this error: > test-ioloop.c: In function `test_ioloop_pending_io': >
2008 Apr 01
2
Unknown internal error
Hello, I just found this message in our dovecot logfiles: "Disconnected: BUG: Unknown internal error" Should I worry about this ? There are no complaints yet (although it is not limited to one user). It seems to occur with different clients (Apple/MacOS mail, Windows/Thunderbird, Pine). We're running dovecot 1.0.10 on Solaris 10 with mboxes (NFS) and local index storage. There are
2008 Jan 25
3
symbolic links to root node
Hello, I have a question about the way Dovecot limits file system access. Currently we're using Dovecot 1.0.5 (Solaris 10). In some cases users have a symbolic link like "z: -> /" in their mail directory. As a result there are log entries like Jan 25 13:30:31 imap1 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz):
2005 Feb 28
5
Too many open files, etc.
Hello, a few days ago I switched out UW-server installation to dovecot 0.99.14 (Solaris 9). There were a few client issues, but mostly the migration was ok. But I have still some questions/problems: +) dovecot-auth: ... PAM: pipe() failed: Too many open files I increased the max. number of open files. Is this normal behaviour, that more than 512 open files are needed ? +) we're using mbox
2011 Apr 18
4
Solaris hardware crypto engines
Hello, I tried to find out how about to use the hardware crypto engines under Solaris (Sun Fire T2000). It seems, that its not just a compilation issue: > For operations that are to be offloaded, it is necessary to restrict use to subset > of OpenSSL functions (the EVP_ functions) and explicitly indicate the use of the PKCS11 > engine; something like the following works for bulk
2005 Jun 14
2
1.0-test73
http://dovecot.org/test/ Two potentially dangerous changes: - mbox parser should now be able to handle CR+LF linefeeds. Hopefully doesn't break anything. - Some mail header parser changes. Hopefully doesn't break anything. And other stuff: - COPY shouldn't crash anymore with 64bit systems - If PAM modifies username, keep it - When auth workers died they leaked file
2005 Dec 14
2
1.0alpha5: fcntl() locking problem
Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, /var/mail is NFS mounted from another Solaris 9 box, home directories and dovecot index stuff is on local ufs filesystems. I upgraded from alpha4 to a5 about 36 hours ago. Dovecot is configured like so during the build: VERSION=1.0.alpha5 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure
2006 Feb 15
2
Thunderbird 1.5 and dovecot 1.0 beta 3 problem
My mailhosting provider has been testing dovecot 1.0 beta 3 as a proxy server and they asked the customers if they would like to test it out and report any issues. I am using Thunderbird 1.5 (IMAP) and have been with this mailhosting company for two months and have no issues at all with their current setup which uses Perdition as their proxy servers. The problem(s) I am encountered have been
2017 Feb 03
0
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
On 2017.02.03. 16:10, Mantas Gegu?is wrote: > Hi, > > thank You for a reply, compiling with Solaris Studio 12.5 solved this case. > > > Martin Preen <preen at informatik.uni-freiburg.de> ra??: > >> Hello, >> I don't have problems building 2.2.27 on Solaris 10 >> (using Sun Workshop compiler 5.11). >> >> The configuration is the same as
2005 Apr 12
2
assertion failed in 1.0-stable
Hello everybody, I get the following assertion error with dovecot 1.0-stable when accessing a large folder: file istream-raw-mbox.c: line 383 (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size): assertion failed: (rstream->body_offset != (uoff_t)-1) There is no error when using dovecot 0.99.14. Any ideas ? Martin ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universitaet
2009 Mar 18
2
panic in dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, with some mbox folders I got this error: Mar 18 14:48:12 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] Panic: IMAP(xyz): file charset-iconv.c: line 122: unreached I assume that this is related to the folder contents (and not the configration). What does that mean to me ? Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r
2005 Feb 02
1
assertion failed in imap-bodystructure.c
Hello, I'm currently testing dovecot/imap (Version 0.99.13). I found this in the log: imap(xxxxx): [ID 265587 mail.crit] file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) dovecot: [ID 684838 mail.error] child 7376 (imap) killed with signal 6 The user tried to setup a new folder (with Thunderbird)
2009 Mar 18
1
NFS-error with dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, I'm testing version 1.1.12 and occasionally there is Mar 18 14:40:44 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz): nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(/home/xyz) failed: Device busy It seems that it is related to a crash of the previous imap process of that user. And it doesn't seem to cause any problems. So can it safely be ignored ? It is on Solaris 10. Index storage
2009 Mar 19
1
largefile question
Hello, currently we're using version 1.0.13 with 32bit file offsets. Is it safe to switch to a new version with largefile support enabled ? We want to reuse existing index/cache or do we have to expect errors with that ? Regards. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum
2017 Feb 05
0
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
On 2 Feb 2017, at 19.38, Mantas Gegu?is <mantas.geguzis at ittc.vu.lt> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am tying to compile Dovecot 2.2.27 on Solaris 10, and I get this error: > test-ioloop.c: In function `test_ioloop_pending_io': > test-ioloop.c:188: error: size of array `type name' is negative Change NULL to (void *)NULL in that line.
2010 May 19
8
Generating all possible models from full model
Is there a function that will allow me to run all model iterations if I specify a full model? I am using information criteria to choose between possible candidate models. I have been writing out all possible model combinations by hand, and I am always worried that I am missing models or have made a mistake somewhere. It is also difficult to alter models if I want to change a term. For example,